Jump to content

07 Obs Brake Issues


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone

 

Wife's truck - 07 Silvy "Classic" OBS

Brakes issues from 7000 miles til now 24000 miles

Pulsating is driving us crazy!!

1st trip to dealer - cut the rotors

2nd trip to dealer - cut the rotors

3rd trip to dealer - cut the rotors on the vehicle THEN replaced them because they were too thin and cut the rear drums

4th trip to dealer - cut the rear drums.

Did not replace the pads or shoes at any time which they said they were not obligated to do under the warranty.

Called GM and said you have to go thru the dealer.

We have now spoken with the General Manager who is speaking with the Service Manager. "We'll get back to you."

Now waiting.

 

I want new rotors, drums, pads and shoes with a brake flush thrown in.

Any thoughts?

Posted

I suspect that they are using cheap rotors on these trucks. The solution appears to be an upgrade to better rotors. The only thing you could do in the mean time is avoiding hard braking by cautious driving and ensuring all lug nuts are hand torqued to specifications.

 

Note: They should have replaced the rotors first time. By turning them, they removed the metal and made them thinner, and even more prove to warpage. They should have replaced the pads and brake shoes as well. Not replacing them and reusing them with new rotors/drums is dumb.

 

I have an '06 crew cab and one of my rotors is grooved without any reason. No adverse effect on brake performance, but I have only 7k on the truck. I think I'll replace the OEM rotors and pads with better aftermarket products when the time comes. I did not bother to take the truck to a dealer under warranty because of the rotor grooving. I know they would just turn the rotors, making the problem worse. They are treating the symptoms, not the disease as I see. The solution is better rotors, drums and associated pads/brake shoes.

Posted

I went thru a few rounds of warranty replacement of warped rotors on my 99 GMT800. I finally got sick of taking it to the dealer every few thousand and purchased a Praise Dyno Stage II rotors/pads (mine is 4wheel disk and I think 99 rotors were smaller then 06). This was not cheap at $900 but more then 100K miles later I'm still running the same rotors with no problems and just last week got new pads and resurfaced the rotors.

Posted
I went thru a few rounds of warranty replacement of warped rotors on my 99 GMT800. I finally got sick of taking it to the dealer every few thousand and purchased a Praise Dyno Stage II rotors/pads (mine is 4wheel disk and I think 99 rotors were smaller then 06). This was not cheap at $900 but more then 100K miles later I'm still running the same rotors with no problems and just last week got new pads and resurfaced the rotors.

 

Here is GM's Answer to the grooving:

 

 

 

Document ID# 2003792

2007 Chevrolet Silverado Classic - 2WD

999999995.gifSubject:Scored Appearance On Front Brake Rotors - keywords disc groove pad #PIC4049B - (08/15/2007)

 

 

Models:2007-2008 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV, Escalade EXT

 

 

 

2007-2008 Chevrolet Avalanche, Silverado, Suburban, Tahoe

 

 

 

2005-2007 Chevrolet Silverado Classic with RPO JF3 or JF7

 

 

 

2005-2007 GMC Sierra Classic with RPO JF3 or JF7

 

 

 

2007-2008 GMC Sierra, Yukon, Yukon XL, Yukon Denali, Yukon Denali XL

 

 

 

1500 Models

 

 

This PI is being superseded to update modelyears. Please discard PIT4049A.

 

The following diagnosis might be helpful if the vehicle exhibits the symptom(s) described in this PI.

 

Condition/Concern:

Some owners may comment on a scored appearance of the front brake rotors. This scoring could be caused by the make up of the front brake lining. The brake lining formula has ingredients to clean rust off the rotor braking surface. This cleaning feature of the rotor braking surface may have a side effect of scoring.

 

Recommendation/Instructions:

This scored appearance is normal as long as no other symptoms are experienced such as pulsation, roughness, noise, and the scoring does not exceed the specification in SI Doc ID 1476240.

 

Please follow this diagnostic or repair process thoroughly and complete each step. If the condition exhibited is resolved without completing every step, the remaining steps do not need to be performed.

 

 

 

GM bulletins are intended for use by professional technicians, NOT a "do-it-yourselfer". They are written to inform these technicians of conditions that may occur on some vehicles, or to provide information that could assist in the proper service of a vehicle. Properly trained technicians have the equipment, tools, safety instructions, and know-how to do a job properly and safely. If a condition is described, DO NOT assume that the bulletin applies to your vehicle, or that your vehicle will have that condition. See your GM dealer for information on whether your vehicle may benefit from the information.

999999994.gif WE SUPPORT VOLUNTARY TECHNICIAN CERTIFICATION

© Copyright General Motors Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

Document ID# 2003792

2007 Chevrolet Silverado Classic - 2WD

 

 

Notice how it says : This scored appearance is normal as long as no other symptoms are experienced such as pulsation, roughness, noise, and the scoring does not exceed the specification in SI Doc ID 1476240.

 

how convenient, best solution is mentioned above, replace the entire rotor/pad with something better aftermarket. I get the feeling that GM is putting the 'standard' parts in our trucks and leaving us to foot the bill for any GOOD parts, but that is my .02 cents.

Posted
I went thru a few rounds of warranty replacement of warped rotors on my 99 GMT800. I finally got sick of taking it to the dealer every few thousand and purchased a Praise Dyno Stage II rotors/pads (mine is 4wheel disk and I think 99 rotors were smaller then 06). This was not cheap at $900 but more then 100K miles later I'm still running the same rotors with no problems and just last week got new pads and resurfaced the rotors.

 

Here is GM's Answer to the grooving:

 

 

 

Document ID# 2003792

2007 Chevrolet Silverado Classic - 2WD

999999995.gifSubject:Scored Appearance On Front Brake Rotors - keywords disc groove pad #PIC4049B - (08/15/2007)

 

 

Models:2007-2008 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV, Escalade EXT

 

 

 

2007-2008 Chevrolet Avalanche, Silverado, Suburban, Tahoe

 

 

 

2005-2007 Chevrolet Silverado Classic with RPO JF3 or JF7

 

 

 

2005-2007 GMC Sierra Classic with RPO JF3 or JF7

 

 

 

2007-2008 GMC Sierra, Yukon, Yukon XL, Yukon Denali, Yukon Denali XL

 

 

 

1500 Models

 

 

This PI is being superseded to update modelyears. Please discard PIT4049A.

 

The following diagnosis might be helpful if the vehicle exhibits the symptom(s) described in this PI.

 

Condition/Concern:

Some owners may comment on a scored appearance of the front brake rotors. This scoring could be caused by the make up of the front brake lining. The brake lining formula has ingredients to clean rust off the rotor braking surface. This cleaning feature of the rotor braking surface may have a side effect of scoring.

 

Recommendation/Instructions:

This scored appearance is normal as long as no other symptoms are experienced such as pulsation, roughness, noise, and the scoring does not exceed the specification in SI Doc ID 1476240.

 

Please follow this diagnostic or repair process thoroughly and complete each step. If the condition exhibited is resolved without completing every step, the remaining steps do not need to be performed.

 

 

 

GM bulletins are intended for use by professional technicians, NOT a "do-it-yourselfer". They are written to inform these technicians of conditions that may occur on some vehicles, or to provide information that could assist in the proper service of a vehicle. Properly trained technicians have the equipment, tools, safety instructions, and know-how to do a job properly and safely. If a condition is described, DO NOT assume that the bulletin applies to your vehicle, or that your vehicle will have that condition. See your GM dealer for information on whether your vehicle may benefit from the information.

999999994.gif WE SUPPORT VOLUNTARY TECHNICIAN CERTIFICATION

© Copyright General Motors Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

Document ID# 2003792

2007 Chevrolet Silverado Classic - 2WD

 

 

Notice how it says : This scored appearance is normal as long as no other symptoms are experienced such as pulsation, roughness, noise, and the scoring does not exceed the specification in SI Doc ID 1476240.

 

how convenient, best solution is mentioned above, replace the entire rotor/pad with something better aftermarket. I get the feeling that GM is putting the 'standard' parts in our trucks and leaving us to foot the bill for any GOOD parts, but that is my .02 cents.

 

 

Which means they would not do anything about my rotors anyway. This bulletin serves to give GM a way out without doing anything. I wonder about "rust removing" pad formulation causing grooving. And how dos it do that? Do the pads have steel spikes cast into them? And why is this happening only on one of my rotors? Only the right side pads have this feature?

Posted

The grooving issue is a separate one. If they turned all of your rotors and drums with no change in the pulsation, it is very possible that you have an out of round tire, a bent or warped wheel, etc. I hope these items were checked by the dealer? There are other items that can cause a pulsation in the brakes. A lot of times these issues will also be accompanied by a vibration at certain speeds but this isn't always the case.. .

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
    • Our customers' safety isn't something we take lightly. To ensure you get the proper assistance for your truck's repairs, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.
    • We appreciate you sharing your experience with your truck. To ensure we get you the proper assistance, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...