Jump to content

Pics Of 06 Sierra With Rwl Out?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Well it looks like i will be keeping my 06 Sierra for now. Dealer wont give me what I want on a trade for an 08. So I am going to need to be getting some tires for the winter. Looking at the Firestone Destinations AT. I just dont know if I want the white letter in or out. My truck is Stealth Grey.

 

Anyone got any pics to help me decide?

Posted

dont feel bad. noone is getting what they want for anything including dealers. the GMS discount has halted most used truck sales cause now it makes more sense to buy brand new. so noone is getting nothing close for what they want on trade for anything. either keep what you got or take a hit. fuel prices are not helping either. i personally feel cars and trucks or now price more relistic to where they should be anyway.

Posted

I'm looking at getting a set of Firestone Destination A/Ts as well. I am definitely mounting mine blacks out. I feel that the tire is a frame for the wheel and I don't want anything else on my frame. :)

 

Not to steal from your thread but does anyone have experience with P285s? It seems everyone who is running a 285 is using LT tires in a C, D, or E load ranges. Any thoughts?

Posted
Is your truck stock, got pics of it??

I will post some pics when i get home tonight. pretty much stock except for a extang cover.

Posted

I can not believe I did not take any pics of my truck when new. I did take these a week or so ago. Only pics I have of my truck.

post-19335-1222297458_thumb.jpg

post-19335-1222297458_thumb.jpg

post-19335-1222297458_thumb.jpg

post-19335-1222297458_thumb.jpg

Posted

Letters out, not a fan of the black wall government fashion statement on A/T tires.

Posted

It really depends on your personal taste and your truck. I personally think blackwalls wouldn't have looked as good on my truck as the OWL do. I think highway tires usually look better blackwall out and off-road and more aggressive on-road /off-road tires usually look better RWL or OWL out. Just my 2 cents.

Posted

Definitely go with the RWL out. :D

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That way if your ever next to me at a stoplight, my truck will look all that much better. :lol:

Posted

i am

i love them

there just big enough to make the truck look good but just small enough to get by without a lift

 

they handle great

 

but still get enough traction to get me through the mud

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...