Jump to content

? For Dofd


Recommended Posts

Posted

It's been about a week hasn't it? Just curious what it's like driving a brand new vehicle.How is it learning to use all the new stuff it has? How 'bout the Cobalt? Yeah,alot of questions....just wondering

 

Gary

Posted

Hey there Gary. :smash:

 

I picked the 'Hoe up on Saturday so it's been 5 days now. So far so good! It is really nice drive a brand new vehicle. :D

 

I haven't noticed any issues so far, it's running really well so far. AFM seems to be working well, the switches between 4 and 8 modes are seamless. There's a little gear searching while cruising around 30MPH, but it's hardly noticeable. If I weren't being really aware of all the little details while I getting the feel of how the new 'Hoe performs and handles it probably wouldn't be noticeable. One thing I have noticed is that the performance under 3000RPM isn't all that impressive, but after that it will really stick you into your seat. In comparison to the old 'Hoe the steering is stiffer but more precise. The bigger and wider tires would play a factor here. The brakes and pedal feeling are very good. The accelerator pedal seems quite sensitive, but that is probably just me getting used to it's 'feel'.

 

The seats are really comfy, not as plush, but well formed. The heated seats are really nice on cold mornings. :sick: There are so many do-dads and gizmos. I think I've played with most of them. The nav system is pretty interesting, though the data on the nav disk is over a year out of date. The stereo is nice, the sound is clear though it's lacking in the bass area and seems to be missing any real 'punch'. But then I've got my own upgrades I've got planned for that. The side blind zone alert is a really nice feature and really accurate letting you know when there is something in a blind zone. Compared to my Dad's 02 Escalade there is more leg room in the front and the driver's position is more comfortable and natural to me. The new 'Hoe is wider than the old 'Hoe or the Esky.

 

All in all I am really happy with it. :D

 

The Cobalt (Otis) is really nice too. It's a very peppy car! It handles and drives really well. My wife loves the built in iPod connection (Personal Audio Link). Though it's stereo has more 'punch' and you know there is a sub-woofer there. I'm also really pleased and happy with the Cobalt. :D

Posted

RE: The lack of "punch" in the stereo, I felt the same way about the setup in mine, when I bought it. I found the stereo controls and turned down the mid-range. That seemed to bring the deeper tones better.

 

Glad to hear you guys are liking both vehicles so well! :smash:

Posted

I did find the audio controls and did fiddle with the bass, treble, and mid settings with little effect. It is a thing with the Bose that it increasingly limits bass response as the volume increases to protect the speakers. I don't know what the crossover settings are but they seem oddly set. It almost seems like the range between 80 and 200 Hz is mostly missing or being under amplified.

 

Another odd thing, there is no built in equalizer. There are controls for fade, balance, bass, treble, mid range. Also DSP modes for normal, surround, rear, and driver. Even the Cobalt and my old 'Hoe had the preset equalizer settings.

Posted
I did find the audio controls and did fiddle with the bass, treble, and mid settings with little effect. It is a thing with the Bose that it increasingly limits bass response as the volume increases to protect the speakers. I don't know what the crossover settings are but they seem oddly set. It almost seems like the range between 80 and 200 Hz is mostly missing or being under amplified.

 

Another odd thing, there is no built in equalizer. There are controls for fade, balance, bass, treble, mid range. Also DSP modes for normal, surround, rear, and driver. Even the Cobalt and my old 'Hoe had the preset equalizer settings.

 

 

Cool,Darin ,glad to hear it.I know you waited a long time for "Hoe.OK,someone's gotta ask the big ?...when's the tune gonna happen :-)

I've had two new cars(actually one was a 79 F250,and the other was a 73 Vega) in my life and it was a great feeling.Love that new car smell....

 

Gary

Posted

It seemed like a long time, but really it was only just over 5 months. I am thankful that I had the opportunity to get the new 'Hoe and Cobalt. :smash:

 

Come the new year after the 'Hoe is nicely 'broken in', I'll be talking to Justin about having a tune done. :sick:

 

There is something about the new car smell, also the smell of fresh leather. :D

Posted
It seemed like a long time, but really it was only just over 5 months. I am thankful that I had the opportunity to get the new 'Hoe and Cobalt. :sick:

 

Come the new year after the 'Hoe is nicely 'broken in', I'll be talking to Justin about having a tune done. :D

 

There is something about the new car smell, also the smell of fresh leather. :D

 

Hmmm, for some reason, talking about "Hoes" and "Leather" together just sounds a little wrong. :smash:

Posted
It seemed like a long time, but really it was only just over 5 months. I am thankful that I had the opportunity to get the new 'Hoe and Cobalt. :lol:

 

Come the new year after the 'Hoe is nicely 'broken in', I'll be talking to Justin about having a tune done. :D

 

There is something about the new car smell, also the smell of fresh leather. :P

 

Hmmm, for some reason, talking about "Hoes" and "Leather" together just sounds a little wrong. :D

 

 

How about the 'smell' of Hoes and Leather ? :smash::sick::D:D

Posted
It seemed like a long time, but really it was only just over 5 months. I am thankful that I had the opportunity to get the new 'Hoe and Cobalt. :lol:

 

Come the new year after the 'Hoe is nicely 'broken in', I'll be talking to Justin about having a tune done. :D

 

There is something about the new car smell, also the smell of fresh leather. :P

 

Hmmm, for some reason, talking about "Hoes" and "Leather" together just sounds a little wrong. :D

 

 

How about the 'smell' of Hoes and Leather ? :smash::sick::D:D

 

 

 

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 413 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...