Jump to content

New Engine..weard But Aowsome

faisal

By faisal
in The Off-Topic Bar

Recommended Posts

faisal Enthusiast

faisal

Posted
Posted

this engine has 150 part (reg engine has 3000)

thats 90% less parts

 

this engine with 1000 cc can push a toyota corola in 75mph just with 1000-RPMs

 

it is 6 times stronger and 66% more efficient

 

and at least 3 times longer in life

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

engine components

 

 

faisal Enthusiast

faisal

Posted
  • Author
Posted

yeah it is...imagen this thing with a turbocharger!!!

 

maybe 10 years from now trucks will be 3.0L and that will be big...i wonder about the TQ...cause the mazda prdeuced the rotary engine with alot of hp from small desplacement,bad mpg, and not enguh TQ to move the engine to a truck or SUV

Schmids5.3l Senior Enthusiast

Schmids5.3l

Posted
Posted
...cause the mazda prdeuced the rotary engine with alot of hp from small desplacement,bad mpg, and not enguh TQ to move the engine to a truck or SUV

 

The rotary is a complete piece of shit :P

faisal Enthusiast

faisal

Posted
  • Author
Posted
...cause the mazda prdeuced the rotary engine with alot of hp from small desplacement,bad mpg, and not enguh TQ to move the engine to a truck or SUV

 

The rotary is a complete piece of shit :lol:

 

 

 

yeah without a turbo that is.... :P

DofD Senior Enthusiast

DofD

Posted
Posted

Thanks for the links there Faisal. Interesting engine. Interesting concept. It may hold some promise in smaller applications right now.

 

Though I can see a few engineering issues when scaling up for larger applications. With such a large rotating mass that isn't circular, I can imagine the difficulties in balancing the engine throughout the full RPM range. There may also be issues in throttle response lag due to the momentum of that spinning exo-cam (for lack of a better term).

faisal Enthusiast

faisal

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Thanks for the links there Faisal. Interesting engine. Interesting concept. It may hold some promise in smaller applications right now.

 

Though I can see a few engineering issues when scaling up for larger applications. With such a large rotating mass that isn't circular, I can imagine the difficulties in balancing the engine throughout the full RPM range. There may also be issues in throttle response lag due to the momentum of that spinning exo-cam (for lack of a better term).

 

I agree.but as you can see the hole engine is made by a man in his work shop,with small budget

 

nothing is perfect...the engines we use today give from 33-40% of the real enrgy of the explosion. this thing give almst 90%

 

my point of view:

the engin will be shaky and big in diameter as you said but with the right amount of money it will be much much better than the riguler V-L shaped engines

 

:thumbs: ..

faisal Enthusiast

faisal

Posted
  • Author
Posted

by the way the first modle was CAMLESS...the second one was made like the engineer said for more power only and to be modified

Draenor Senior Enthusiast

Draenor

Posted
Posted
...cause the mazda prdeuced the rotary engine with alot of hp from small desplacement,bad mpg, and not enguh TQ to move the engine to a truck or SUV

 

The rotary is a complete piece of shit :D

 

True

 

Shit>Rotary

 

 

:thumbs:

P71_CrownVic Senior Enthusiast

P71_CrownVic

Posted
Posted
Didn't Ford use a rotary engine in the Probe? I haven't seen one of those car's in year's.

 

Uhh...no.

 

From 1989-1992 it had:

 

2.2 I4 - 120HP

2.2 I4 Turbo - 145HP

3.0 V6 - 140HP

 

From 1993-1997 it had:

 

2.0 I4 - 118HP

2.5 V6 - 164HP

Zembonez Senior Enthusiast

Zembonez

Posted
Posted
...cause the mazda prdeuced the rotary engine with alot of hp from small desplacement,bad mpg, and not enguh TQ to move the engine to a truck or SUV

 

The rotary is a complete piece of shit :D

 

Are you sure? I had several RX7s that were awesome. Even a street ported 12A was practically unbeatable by anything that wasn't built to the teeth. Many non turbo cars easily ran in the low 13s. (modified of course) I like rotaries! :thumbs:

 

Check out this nut!

Schmids5.3l Senior Enthusiast

Schmids5.3l

Posted
Posted
yeah without a turbo that is.... :D

 

Are you sure? I had several RX7s that were awesome. Even a street ported 12A was practically unbeatable by anything that wasn't built to the teeth. Many non turbo cars easily ran in the low 13s. (modified of course) I like rotaries! :thumbs:

 

Check out this nut!

 

 

When you factor fuel economy, power band, incredible lack of torque, costs, incredible lack of anything in the lower half of the tachometer, and whatnot, I think they are inferior to piston engines (esp the LSx) in every way possible. JMO!!! :P They are different, but even technology of the 1950's owns them... I'm not talking about you Jim. LOL had to!!! :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 421 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • AlVeron
      Manufactuer's Defect - Paint Failure - Cherry Red High Country 2021 Suburban

      By AlVeron · Posted

      This is NOT impact damage nor neglect. There were previous class action lawsuits because of such paint preparation st GM manufacturing plant. Not just the Cherry Red Color. This paint is applied in three processes to obtain the desired color.  The manufacturer will cover for 36 months or 36k miles only. That rust is actually corrosion because of the paint process failure. Corrosion is covered for 100,100 miles or a certain months. However their corrosion doesn't include this type. Go figure. Clearly manufacturer knew from previous paint issues. This started 3 weeks ago out of the blue.  
    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • davester
      2015 Silverado 3500 right rear turn indicator failure

      By davester · Posted

      consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • davester
      My First Project and GMC has me stumped

      By davester · Posted

      can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...