Jump to content

2005 Chevy Silverado


Recommended Posts

Posted

I own a 2005 Chevy Silverado 5.3L. The problem I am having is that when I first start the engine I get blue smoke which is oil burning. After about 10 seconds it clears up and no more smoke. I just replaced valve guide seals, and still have the same problem. Is there any other way that the oil can be getting in somewhere to cause this problem? Can it be from the EGR valve or EVAP solenoid. I'm at a loss here and running out of options.

Posted
I own a 2005 Chevy Silverado 5.3L. The problem I am having is that when I first start the engine I get blue smoke which is oil burning. After about 10 seconds it clears up and no more smoke. I just replaced valve guide seals, and still have the same problem. Is there any other way that the oil can be getting in somewhere to cause this problem? Can it be from the EGR valve or EVAP solenoid. I'm at a loss here and running out of options.

Others may correct me if I am wrong here but I have not heard of anybody with 5.3 smoking issues. If you are not consuming oil but are getting a blue puff on startup, it almost has to be in the heads somewhere. This used to be common on high mileage older generation 4.3, 5.0 & 5.7s because of worn valve guides leaking oil into the cylinders when the engine was shut off.

Posted
Others may correct me if I am wrong here but I have not heard of anybody with 5.3 smoking issues. If you are not consuming oil but are getting a blue puff on startup, it almost has to be in the heads somewhere. This used to be common on high mileage older generation 4.3, 5.0 & 5.7s because of worn valve guides leaking oil into the cylinders when the engine was shut off.

+1 Its normally the valve stems seals, or worse the valves them selves.

Posted

This certainly sounds like what happens with worn valve guide seals. Had this happen on my '90. Valves not seating right on the new seals? Could it be a problem with one of the values itself?

Posted

Once the valve guides are worn, it allows the valve to move laterally and the seals can leak (even if new). The seals are designed to sweep oil off of the valve stem during up and down movement.

Posted

Acually I'm seeing 5.3 with valve guide issues and causeing your problem. Its the seals or a guide in a head, sounds like its just one of the heads it has a weak guides I have been seeing on the older 5.3.

Posted

Consensus has been achieved. :thumbs:

 

A valve job is in order whenever you feel like it.

Posted

if my truck sits for about a week.. then i start it.. i get the puff of death smoke...lol. but every day starting... never noticable. the valve guides are leaky leaky i do believe =) but.. its not more than a drop so... im not worried.

Posted

So even if the valve guides are new it can still leak down? :lol: Could it be the valves themself not closing all the way.The motor has 76,000 on it.I just changed the oil two weeks ago and I had to add 1qt of oil already.Somedays it smokes evertime I start it and somedays not at all.

Posted

I am reaching here but thought I would ask. Have you recently replaced the PCV valve? Your truck should have a "fixed orfice style" PCV valve and not the style with valve. The early model 5.3s had the valve style and they did allow some oil to be recirculated which is not what you want.

 

Check it out, make sure it is a fixed orfice style and that it is free and clear in there.

 

The amt of oil you just had to add in such a short period of time sounds like too much to be valve seals. My 1971 may puff just a little at start up but I never have to add any oil. It has the original seals and is 38 years old. I can't complain.

Posted

You replaced the seals. Having worn guides or valves is different. This was mentioned in an earlier post. You're burning a small amounts of oil while you're driving. It's just noticed when you start-up after sitting for a bit. I've got a 350 that needs a valve job due to worn guides/valves.

 

Is the oil useage the same, more or less than before you replaced the seals? If it's more, you may have not gotten them on correctly

 

 

+1 on the PCV.

 

I'm sure you would've noticed while the covers were over, oil drain back holes all open?

Posted

before you go spending crazy money. Gm has the worst PCV system ever. fact is it suck in oil and then the oil rests inside the intake. when you go to start the truck up in the morning it will smoke some. I been moddign this motors for years now and never once ever seen a bad valve guide.

Posted

Yes check the pcv system first to make everyone happy. If thats not the case then fix the guides I see 2-4 of these engines a day in the shop and YES lots of them have bad guides!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • A little girl said her prayers every night before bed and she asked G d to watch after each person she loved. One night she forgot to pray for her babysitter and her babysitter died. A few days later she forgot to pray for someone else and they died. The next night she forgot to pray for her dad. The next morning her dad was terrified. A bus almost crashed into him. He almost fell off a fifty foot ladder and almost wrecked on the way home. When he arrived home, he said I had a terrible day. His wife replied, “You think you had a bad day? My aerobics teacher died during class.
    • Nice! I had one here, once. The car dealer I used to haul for stopped by with it. That was over 10 years ago now. Those are SUPER rare these days, especially up here! Never even see them at car shows anymore.   https://postimg.cc/0rvcNZ1W
    • I remember watching one of the auctions on TV. It just happened that they had two little red express trucks. My brother bought one new in 1979, still has it. So I hung on to watch them cross. The retro redone example brought more bids and went for more money than the original one did. My brother has redone his 3 times and raced it. He’s now in the process of making more tame for cruising. 
    • I always upgraded the suspension and steering components - bushings and ball joints, and had older cars that I could out-corner ANY modern car with. I used to be able to take my '78 Cutlass on off-ramps at stupid speeds and make the sharp MA corners without even squealing the tires. So much fun. My '72 El Camino must've had work done by the previous owner, since that thing seemed to handle even better than the '78.   I think the suspension & steering on the '72 was much more advanced than the '64, so that probably just made a good system even better.   I'm the same way with vehicles. I hate having to worry about the paint on my '93 W250 Cummins. I'm not used to that, lol.   https://postimg.cc/mzKr55sY
    • BEAUTIFUL!! That a Cutlass F85? Or 442? My side-ID skills are lacking thanks to failing memory, lol. Love that color & year, too!   Yeah I was never big on entering my own stuff, but I always liked seeing what everyone had, the rare models, and what's been modified. That was always fun. These days I have barely enough time to do what needs to be done at home.    Oddly enough, here in MA there are more car shows than ever in history! You'd think up here it would be dead, but it's bigger than EVER!          Took the 940 for its maiden voyage with the carburetor. At first I couldn't get out of the yard! This originally had the "Bosch" system (our other 940 has Regina - single fuel pump in fuel tank, and space-age-looking ignition coil on driver's fender) - that has dual fuel pumps. One in the tank, and one under the center left of the vehicle. I had unplugged the external one thinking I wouldn't need it with the carburetor ... but the way I have the pressure regulator hooked up, 90% of the fuel volume is going back to the fuel tank, so cranked all the way down, the regulator is only supplying a hair above 3.5 PSI to the carb. Turns out the in-tank pump (15 PSI alone, instead of 45) couldn't handle the load. Plugged it back in and went for a rip. Ran great!   Throttle response is always amazing with carburetors. ZERO delay that no FI system can reproduce. Also fires up in half the crank rotations as before. Low end power was DRAMATICALLY improved. There was an ongoing lean issue with the FI that I got tired of figuring out, so this is a MASSIVE improvement! Above 50 MPH on hills it feels SUPER weak, though. This is more than likely due to the timing not being advanced enough by the computer, since it believes there are multiple failures. I can live with that through the winter. Will keep me from passing slowpokes where I shouldn't and getting speeding tickets at least. 😁
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...