Jump to content

New Technologies and Future GM Platforms


Recommended Posts

Posted

Was thinking about how new technologies have made their way into vehicles for the last few decades. At one point airbags were considered futuristic, now a $15,000 car comes with like 7 of them.

 

Another time, GPS was Mercedes-level stuff only, now it's available as an option on value hatchbacks as well.

 

Ditto with Active Fuel Management, Anti-Lock Brakes, MP3 player compatibility, TPM sensors...all these things add some level of versatility or benefit to us (though their implementation is sometimes questionable) but what's next?

 

Which new technologies would you like to see on future products? Which features do you think would make your life a lot easier/better if your car had them?

 

Personally, I'm hoping for the following:

 

* Internet radio / real-time traffic. Some cars already have this, so I hope GM adds it. I have an aftermarket head unit (Pioneer) but I'd ditch it in a second if GM had their own equivalent of the Ford Sync stuff that was usable and incorporated real-time internet for traffic, radio (Pandora, Spotify, etc), and maps with location search that's automatically updated. Also, Yelp integration would be great for business trips.

 

* Better fuel economy / a reasonable hybrid product. The current Hybrid GMT900s just plain suck. Add 10% better mileage for 20% more money. No thanks. What I'd like to see is a "performance" truck hybrid, something like the old GMC Cyclone or Chevy Typhoon, with a high-torque electric motor to assist the high-horsepower standard gas engine. Some real performance could come out of something like that if the weight balance was right. I'd also like to see a full size, crew-cab pickup at over 20mpg city in the next 5-10 years with over 300 hp / 350 tq.

 

 

 

You guys?

Posted

A diesel in a half ton and better trannys... That's about it for me. Basically any fuel mileage gain past what we already have from more gears is either shedding weight, or so minimal it's not worthwhile (AFM, hybrids). I think more R&D should go into making the trucks last longer, as that is the best way to truly achieve "efficiency" with a heavy vehicle.

Posted

Transmissions already are probably the best in the business, some people don't like how the 6-speeds behave but you're never going to get a vehicle now that holds lower gears, they all aim for top gear as fast as possible, which is why I always drive at lower speeds in M4 or M5. I'd just like more flexibility in powertrain configuration- getting a bigger engine in the lighter truck- ie a 6.2 with 3.73s in a reg. cab. Though I really think the direct injection will help whatever GM uses in the new trucks tremendously- GDI is so much more responsive the engine feels more powerful than it really is.

Posted

I would like things to be more simple . A truck with a 6 speed stick shift , no touch screen radio or crap like that , just a good reliable work truck that is under 20 thousand with a motor that is meant for work and not zip. Alot of this tech I dont care for and it just makes vehicles more expensive. I wish manufacturing plants where like Dells website you order what you want.

Posted

You're not going to find sticks in trucks anymore because automatics beat them at pretty much every performance metric and reliability is becoming a non-issue too. A friend of mine had his 4L60 rebuilt at 200k as a precaution, nothing more. Though with the shift kit he used the 1-2 shift now will about snap your neck. :lol:

Posted

You're not going to find sticks in trucks anymore because automatics beat them at pretty much every performance metric and reliability is becoming a non-issue too. A friend of mine had his 4L60 rebuilt at 200k as a precaution, nothing more. Though with the shift kit he used the 1-2 shift now will about snap your neck. :lol:

 

yea I dont care about the performance of a stick or anything like that I am just like the concept of it even if its not as good as a auto,
Posted

I would like them to work on the ergonomics of existing controls so they can be operated by feel without looking away from the road while keeping the "improved" features of the newer systems. A prime example is the H&V controls.

I would like to see them "recontent" some of the features they have "decontented" - like footwell lights.

Posted

I would like them to work on the ergonomics of existing controls so they can be operated by feel without looking away from the road while keeping the "improved" features of the newer systems. A prime example is the H&V controls.

I would like to see them "recontent" some of the features they have "decontented" - like footwell lights.

 

 

I like this concept. Trucks are daily drivers for a lot of people (like myself), and some people have long commutes in rush-hour like conditions. Making the HVAC and Audio Controls more intuitive is a great idea. I'd love to see voice activated NAV, too. "Computer, GPS directions to nearest gas station with diesel." or whatever.

 

I hate having to go through nested menus on a touch screen.

Posted

I wouldn't mind voice control if it actually worked. Every Ford with Sync (not the new thing that's giving Ford headaches) I've tried can't understand me. At all. :lol:

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Oh I forgot. The great high tech item of a cabin filter would make me think of trading up!

Posted

I second the diesel in a half ton. that would be a great option.

 

 

Won't happen. GM aleady tried that and paid the price of failure.

 

I agree there is not going to be a diesel half ton truck.. Theres just no market for it..
Posted

I second the diesel in a half ton. that would be a great option.

 

 

Won't happen. GM aleady tried that and paid the price of failure.

 

I agree there is not going to be a diesel half ton truck.. Theres just no market for it..

 

 

If they keep up the progress with the direct injection, high compression gas engines, eventually we can see the benefits of the diesel engine without the problems of using diesel fuel. Diesel's being great doesn't have much to due to the fuel, the fuel simply allows the engine to work...it's due to the insane compression ratio and combination with the turbochargers for efficiency.

 

A few automotive companies have been working on building gasoline engines that perform like diesels (high compression self ignition diesel cycles) that promise the benefits while running regular gasoline.

 

Long term, if reciprocating internal combustion engines aren't made obsolete via gas turbine/series hybrid vehicles (electricity on it's own is a joke due to the lack of infrastructure, insane charge times and poor battery technology), i see gasoline engine and diesel engine design converging into a single engine technology that provides the benefits of both systems. Ford's Ecoboost is a step in the right direction, but it needs to make serious efficiency increases to be an effective competitor.

 

So in conclusion, if GM started offering a high compression, twin turbo 5.3L/5.5L V8 for 'efficiency' reasons, I'd be all over it. :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,580 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...