Jump to content

Lawn Mowers

camaro mark

By camaro mark
in The Off-Topic Bar

Recommended Posts

camaro mark Enthusiast

camaro mark

Posted
Posted

I have been looking on craigs list in my area and there are some decent self propelled 36" plus lawn mowers. Of course I would love a stander or riding zero turn but don't really want to spend that kind of money. So here is my concern. My front yard is not that large and does have some tight 90 degree areas with a fence. However my backyard is pretty good size and I could probably cut my mowing time in half not to mention some of those older mowers come with sulkey (I think that is what they are called) so it would be pretty cool to ride around. I know that is not a good reason to buy a mower but hey you only live once.

 

These mowers are obviously massive and I'm curious how tough they are to navigate. I guess overall looking for pro's and con's of these mowers. I currently use a cheap 22" and would love to upgrade.

 

Thanks

dansk Enthusiast

dansk

Posted
Posted

If you are talking about like an old gravely with a sulky, they were terrible as far and manuevering. Too long a wheelbase with the sulky attached. You could always continue using the 22" for your tight areas and the new mower for the wide open spaces.

hockeypro1411 Senior Enthusiast

hockeypro1411

Posted
Posted

Operating a walk-behind mower is simple. Using one to turn a lawn into a masterpiece can take some serious practice. One thing to consider is whether or not you have a gate. If not, try to get a decent size deck. A good operator can get a good cut with a 36" almost anywhere. 48" and larger decks save time in open spaces, but can add time onto the trimming. I've used several commercial brands, and they'll all serve your needs just fine for one yard a week. The only thing to consider is whether it is a belt drive, or a hydro. They operate on the same principal, but the belt drives can require a little more "wrangling" in tight spaces.

camaro mark Enthusiast

camaro mark

Posted
  • Author
Posted
If you are talking about like an old gravely with a sulky, they were terrible as far and manuevering. Too long a wheelbase with the sulky attached. You could always continue using the 22" for your tight areas and the new mower for the wide open spaces.

 

So the hydro is a better choice? I assume it works just like the riders? I do have a gate and I was thinking a 36" would serve my purpose. Anything larger is probably more than I need.

sab316 Enthusiast

sab316

Posted
Posted

Your gate is a huge thing to consider. My family owns a lawncare business (we own about 12 Exmark zero turn mowers) and it sucks when you can't fit a mower inside a gate. 36" won't be too bad in the tight areas maybe a bit more weed eating here and there but you'll like the extra cutting deck in the wide open spaces

99silveradoz71 Senior Enthusiast

99silveradoz71

Posted
Posted

I do 3 lawns for family with a Lesco 48" belt drive walk behind and have plenty of praise for it. Others are right though, when you get into areas with fences or confined spaces, it gets to be a bit snug.

hockeypro1411 Senior Enthusiast

hockeypro1411

Posted
Posted
Your gate is a huge thing to consider. My family owns a lawncare business (we own about 12 Exmark zero turn mowers) and it sucks when you can't fit a mower inside a gate. 36" won't be too bad in the tight areas maybe a bit more weed eating here and there but you'll like the extra cutting deck in the wide open spaces

 

Yea, gates were our number one enemy too. The only good ones were chain-link because you can untwist the metal ties and "roll up" the fence and get a walk-behind between the posts without harming the fence. And yes, hyrdo will be a better choice for handling. Another downside to a belt drive (may not concern you as much) is that when you have to cut in the rain or wet turf, the belts get wet and can slip. Also a hydro will be better suited to pull a sulky.

WaterGuy Enthusiast

WaterGuy

Posted
Posted

Since your backyard is the largest, just get a 46" and don't worry about the gate.

Use your smaller mower for the front.

I weed-wack as much as possible with Round Up.

 

Where ya at?

I've just finished rebuilding my 46" with 25HP twin cylinder with "hydra-drive".

For sale.

camaro mark Enthusiast

camaro mark

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks for the response guys. After reading a lot of this I'm starting to rethink things. I have approx 7000sq ft to mow with 4ft gates. Back yard is fenced so it sounds like I may not save a lot of time even with a 36" mower. Maybe I need to look at other options. Do they make mowers larger than 22" before getting into commercial grade (36"+)?

 

I think the thing that appealed to me the most is the MAN side of me kicking in which is wanting the baddest mower on the block. Kind of like wanting a diesel when a 1/2 ton more that suites my needs.

hockeypro1411 Senior Enthusiast

hockeypro1411

Posted
Posted
Since your backyard is the largest, just get a 46" and don't worry about the gate.

Use your smaller mower for the front.

I weed-wack as much as possible with Round Up.

People who do that drive me absolutely insane. Especially when it's an account that I personally spent time cutting/maintaining. The thought of those beautiful edges getting sprayed because someone doesn't want to spend the time trimming. :D

 

Thanks for the response guys. After reading a lot of this I'm starting to rethink things. I have approx 7000sq ft to mow with 4ft gates. Back yard is fenced so it sounds like I may not save a lot of time even with a 36" mower. Maybe I need to look at other options. Do they make mowers larger than 22" before getting into commercial grade (36"+)?

 

I think the thing that appealed to me the most is the MAN side of me kicking in which is wanting the baddest mower on the block. Kind of like wanting a diesel when a 1/2 ton more that suites my needs.

That's completely natural. ...Not to mention ALWAYS the best solution. :eek:

 

You wouldn't believe the amount of time that a 36" will save. Not to mention how much better the lawn will look without all those hideous 2" lines from the wheels. However, if you're interested, Exmark makes a 26" push mower.

 

http://www.exmark.com/metro26.htm

 

There. Saved ya some leg work.

WaterGuy Enthusiast

WaterGuy

Posted
Posted

I weed-wack as much as possible with Round Up.

People who do that drive me absolutely insane. Especially when it's an account that I personally spent time cutting/maintaining. The thought of those beautiful edges getting sprayed because someone doesn't want to spend the time trimming. :D

 

 

If I was wanting the "Yard of The Month" look then I would reconsider the R-up useage.

sab316 Enthusiast

sab316

Posted
Posted

If you look at a 36" push mower just look at a 40" (or maybe its 42" I forget) zero-turn. Yes its more money, but its alot nicer :D

hockeypro1411 Senior Enthusiast

hockeypro1411

Posted
Posted
If you look at a 36" push mower just look at a 40" (or maybe its 42" I forget) zero-turn. Yes its more money, but its alot nicer :lol:

 

The Exmark push mower is 26" and for the price tag, something tells me it won't require very much pushing from the operator. Lol.

sab316 Enthusiast

sab316

Posted
Posted
If you look at a 36" push mower just look at a 40" (or maybe its 42" I forget) zero-turn. Yes its more money, but its alot nicer :lol:

 

The Exmark push mower is 26" and for the price tag, something tells me it won't require very much pushing from the operator. Lol.

 

 

We have one and it works well. Very heavy duty and been running good for 4+ years now

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined

  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 440 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • davester
      2015 Silverado 3500 right rear turn indicator failure

      By davester · Posted

      consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • davester
      My First Project and GMC has me stumped

      By davester · Posted

      can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • Chuck FB
      Tire pressure for 37s

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Snowcamo
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By Snowcamo · Posted

      Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...