Jump to content

Hids And Common Decency

Spurshot

Recommended Posts

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted

Lastnight, I was headed over to a friend's for dinner and encountered a number of irritating, clearly retrofit, HID vehicles.

 

First one was when I was going down Pacific Coast Hwy in the city of Lomita (stop and go in heavy traffic) when I was blinded by an incredible amount of light from Chevy 1/2 ton (2005-6 ish) with HID fogs and Lo beams. The truck was 2 lanes over, headed in the opposite direction, but stopped at a light. This is in a densely populated city on a 4 lane street with signals every 1/4 mile and street lights every 30 yds or so. The friggin lunitic didn't give a rats axe about anyone else, but thought he looked cool. I'd have paid good money to see that idiot get a ticket.

 

The next one was when I was going home and as I rounded a right corner at a stoplight, I saw a driver in the leftturn lane holding his hand up to block the light from a ricer with HIDs across the intersection. As I went aruond the corner, the HID car was behind me and the light was glaring in my mirrors.

 

On the freeway, I could spot the HID retrofits among the factory HID cars going in the opposite direction. They were clearly the ones with huge amounts of glare.

 

It's really getting very prevalent around LA to retrofit vehicles with HIDs. It's also getting very distracting and irritating. Frankly, I think there's going to be a major crackdown on them soon. They're getting out of hand with people that are abusing the crap out of these things.

 

There, I feel better.

:lol:

brims Senior Enthusiast

brims

Posted
Posted

Ya, here in LA we are getting them like crazy and like you said, people just don't care if they are blinding people. I sure do hope they crack down on those HID retrofits. They are worthless in the city, and dangerous. Hell, even the factory systems are pretty annoying. Those projector housings, you're a city block away and you see this bright light way the hell down there and you think "turn your high beams off jerk" you get to the car, there's nothing wrong. The projector housings give a very intense beam far away.

C. Charles Hahn Senior Enthusiast

C. Charles Hahn

Posted
Posted

I agree 100%, people who do an improper retrofit of HIDs on their vehicles and don't adjust the lights/test them adequately should be given hell for it. However I still am NOT going to say that HID retrofits are universally a bad thing. Done right, they can absolutely improve night safety in situations with low ambient lighting from other sources WITHOUT being a nuisance for other drivers.

mkelly Enthusiast

mkelly

Posted
Posted
Lastnight, I was headed over to a friend's for dinner and encountered a number of irritating, clearly retrofit, HID vehicles.

 

First one was when I was going down Pacific Coast Hwy in the city of Lomita (stop and go in heavy traffic) when I was blinded by an incredible amount of light from Chevy 1/2 ton (2005-6 ish) with HID fogs and Lo beams. The truck was 2 lanes over, headed in the opposite direction, but stopped at a light. This is in a densely populated city on a 4 lane street with signals every 1/4 mile and street lights every 30 yds or so. The friggin lunitic didn't give a rats axe about anyone else, but thought he looked cool. I'd have paid good money to see that idiot get a ticket.

 

The next one was when I was going home and as I rounded a right corner at a stoplight, I saw a driver in the leftturn lane holding his hand up to block the light from a ricer with HIDs across the intersection. As I went aruond the corner, the HID car was behind me and the light was glaring in my mirrors.

 

On the freeway, I could spot the HID retrofits among the factory HID cars going in the opposite direction. They were clearly the ones with huge amounts of glare.

 

It's really getting very prevalent around LA to retrofit vehicles with HIDs. It's also getting very distracting and irritating. Frankly, I think there's going to be a major crackdown on them soon. They're getting out of hand with people that are abusing the crap out of these things.

 

There, I feel better.

:lol:

 

+1

 

 

What really kills me is that they dont make the vehicle look high class or provide any more light, they make the car/truck look like crap.

 

I would love to see these vehicles towed and impounded(they are illegal after all) when they get caught......

mkelly Enthusiast

mkelly

Posted
Posted
I agree 100%, people who do an improper retrofit of HIDs on their vehicles and don't adjust the lights/test them adequately should be given hell for it. However I still am NOT going to say that HID retrofits are universally a bad thing. Done right, they can absolutely improve night safety in situations with low ambient lighting from other sources WITHOUT being a nuisance for other drivers.

 

Not without changing the housing to a projector style housing that is designed for HID lights. That is why hid kits that mount in regular housings designed for halogen lights are illegal.

 

No matter how low you aim the lights there is still more scatter than is acceptable. There is a reason OEM dont use the same reflector housing for HID lights as they do for halogen..........

jtupper Enthusiast

jtupper

Posted
Posted
I agree 100%, people who do an improper retrofit of HIDs on their vehicles and don't adjust the lights/test them adequately should be given hell for it. However I still am NOT going to say that HID retrofits are universally a bad thing. Done right, they can absolutely improve night safety in situations with low ambient lighting from other sources WITHOUT being a nuisance for other drivers.

 

Not without changing the housing to a projector style housing that is designed for HID lights. That is why hid kits that mount in regular housings designed for halogen lights are illegal.

 

No matter how low you aim the lights there is still more scatter than is acceptable. There is a reason OEM dont use the same reflector housing for HID lights as they do for halogen..........

 

I was seriously considering converting to HID's on my Tahoee, but I was worried about scatter issues so I recently modified some 9005 cool blue bulbs to fit in my low beam housings (9006). That alone made a huge difference. They are so much whiter that my OEM bulbs. Now I'm considering moving those over to the high beam side and modifying some 9005 silver star ultras to go in the low beams.

steiny93 Enthusiast

steiny93

Posted
Posted

personally,

I've only been adding the hid retrofit to the high beams, I'm not following the advantage on the low beam side.

 

 

mkelly curious where you found your info

"That is why hid kits that mount in regular housings designed for halogen lights are illegal."

mkelly Enthusiast

mkelly

Posted
Posted
personally,

I've only been adding the hid retrofit to the high beams, I'm not following the advantage on the low beam side.

 

 

mkelly curious where you found your info

"That is why hid kits that mount in regular housings designed for halogen lights are illegal."

 

Straight from the nhsta, they violate fvmss no 108.

 

http://isearch.nhtsa.gov/files/deetz.ztv.html

amtz.zero Enthusiast

amtz.zero

Posted
Posted

Yes, I hate this too. I have to drive a long road to work everyday and it is so annoying! And like someone else said, it doesn't make the car look any cooler at all. I would LOVE to see a big crackdown on them sometime soon. Oh, and what I really think looks bad are the "euro" taillights. Ugly as hell if you ask me..

vdubmurray Enthusiast

vdubmurray

Posted
Posted

I'd like to see companies come out with a NICE looking projector headlight. The ones on the market now are very cheap looking. :lol:

 

I don't want halos around my bulbs! This isn't a BMW!

 

[ / end my rant ] :lol:

Heysdad Enthusiast

Heysdad

Posted
Posted

I love my HID's...They light up the road much better than stock and that makes it safer for me and my family. If you don't have them, how do you know they don't give more light? I found a huge difference....They do need to be aimed though after install.

 

I was in LA 1 week ago and I think y'all have a much larger problem with people texting while driving. It seemed like every way I looked on the 405 and 101 people are texting while driving...What a bunch of losers....I think that needs to be addressed over HID's. Just my 2 cents....

P71_CrownVic Senior Enthusiast

P71_CrownVic

Posted
Posted

My HIDs are great.

 

And I marked where the reg. beam hit on my garage door and found that the HIDs are almost exactly dead on.

 

I don't see how a tube of light (HID) and a tube of light (reg. bulb) could spread light differently. It certainly would have been a waste to have the lights properly aimed...in fact...I bet they wouldn't have even touched them...

C. Charles Hahn Senior Enthusiast

C. Charles Hahn

Posted
Posted
My HIDs are great.

 

And I marked where the reg. beam hit on my garage door and found that the HIDs are almost exactly dead on.

 

I don't see how a tube of light (HID) and a tube of light (reg. bulb) could spread light differently. It certainly would have been a waste to have the lights properly aimed...in fact...I bet they wouldn't have even touched them...

 

Actually, there IS a difference in the light spread because instead of light being emitted by a hot filament (halogen) the light is emitted by an arc between two electrodes in a gas filled chamber (HID). That is why there can be issues with scatter in some housings.... the "arc" may be brighter, but it isn't as concentrated which can cause light to "scatter" in a housing that isn't well designed.

 

However, I would like to point out that a few years ago there WERE some OEM manufacturers using reflector housings for HID lights, GM included. Remember the GMC Envoy based on the S10 Blazer platform? Or the GMT800 Escalades? Both were using HID setups in reflector housings. In the Envoy's case, I don't think the housing was any different than the one the Jimmy/Sonoma got.

 

So again, a quality kit installed the right way is really not much different than an OEM reflector setup as long as the install is done properly and adjustments are made accordingly.

brims Senior Enthusiast

brims

Posted
Posted
I love my HID's...They light up the road much better than stock and that makes it safer for me and my family. If you don't have them, how do you know they don't give more light? I found a huge difference....They do need to be aimed though after install.

 

I was in LA 1 week ago and I think y'all have a much larger problem with people texting while driving. It seemed like every way I looked on the 405 and 101 people are texting while driving...What a bunch of losers....I think that needs to be addressed over HID's. Just my 2 cents....

 

We have laws about using the phone while driving, the cops just don't give tickets. For about a month after the law was passed people weren't using their phones much. Now people are using their phones, pressed up against their ear more than before the law was passed.

 

And if any of you believe the HIDs aren't any different than halogen lights, you need to take your truck and park it next to a truck with halogens and have both sets of lights on and look at them. Anyone that can't see a difference is blind and shouldn't be driving in the first place.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • PhilB
      No 12v outlets in 2026 gmc Sierra

      By PhilB · Posted

      It is possible to add your own 12v outlet to your truck.  Check out this video:   I verified via GM Upfitters that pin 31 is the same on the 1500 trucks.  The wire is GM part number 84779405.   You can get the GM 12v outlet from Amazon  https://www.amazon.com/Genuine-Accessory-Receptacle-25774623-13549530/dp/B0F1H9YRGF EWAY 12 Volt Power Adapter for GM   https://www.amazon.com/EWAY-Chevrolet-Silverado-Cigarette-Ignition/dp/B0915RRW6Q/ref=sr_1_1?   I just haven't figured out a good place to put the 12v outlet in my truck.   Some people are getting USB-C to 12V adapters  https://www.amazon.com/WYMECT-Cigarette-Lighter-Socket-Adapter/dp/B0F87WNQKB/ref=sr_1_1_sspa? Not sure if they provide the correct amperage that a device like a tire inflator would need.  
    • Core-Lokt
      Wiring Help, Please

      By Core-Lokt · Posted

      Thanks; I looked there a few minutes, and I think I can find something. I really never looked there, as I thought it was stuff like PTO/aftermarket bodies/accessories like snow plows.
    • newdude
      2 speed transfer case optional now?

      By newdude · Posted

      This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • newdude
      Different requirements for oil filters?

      By newdude · Posted

      2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Grumpy Bear
      Different requirements for oil filters?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...