Jump to content

What Lift Kit Do I Get?

wotexva99

Recommended Posts

wotexva99 Enthusiast

wotexva99

Posted
Posted

I have a 01 1500Hd and want to put a lift kit on it. I'm thinking a 4" lift would be good. What are the advantages of a 6" lift? My truck is NOT a 4x4 but when i go camping and/or dirt bike riding, i encounter some challenging terrain and high rocks.

 

What 4" lift kits will fit the HD and what do rec?

herkdriver007 Enthusiast

herkdriver007

Posted
Posted

My opinion would be to evaluate several options and ask yourself a few questions before beginning:

 

Are you picking a particular lift due to brand, quality, a good deal, etc?

Do you have a set of tires, specifically a size, that you want to run?

Are you looking for ground clearance at the diffs, or overall height on the truck?

What sort of off-roading will you encounter; you mentioned "challenging terrain" and "high rocks"...does that mean much off-camber or lots of dirt hills?

 

Overall, I would say the lowest amount of lift to clear the tires you want would be the way to proceed. Also, if you increase the tire size much, you'll want to install new lower (numerically higher) gears in the rear axle, and even possibly a locker or posi depending on what your off road intentions are. If you're going to play in the dirt, occasional mud, and maybe cross some rough terrain, I'd go with a selectable locker, like an Eaton E-Locker or ARB Air-locker. That way you have the street manners of an open diff but can lock it up when off road and maintain some traction (very important since you're a 2WD).

 

Just my opinion...let us know what you get and post pics when you do!!

wotexva99 Enthusiast

wotexva99

Posted
  • Author
Posted
My opinion would be to evaluate several options and ask yourself a few questions before beginning:

 

Are you picking a particular lift due to brand, quality, a good deal, etc?

Do you have a set of tires, specifically a size, that you want to run?

Are you looking for ground clearance at the diffs, or overall height on the truck?

What sort of off-roading will you encounter; you mentioned "challenging terrain" and "high rocks"...does that mean much off-camber or lots of dirt hills?

 

Overall, I would say the lowest amount of lift to clear the tires you want would be the way to proceed. Also, if you increase the tire size much, you'll want to install new lower (numerically higher) gears in the rear axle, and even possibly a locker or posi depending on what your off road intentions are. If you're going to play in the dirt, occasional mud, and maybe cross some rough terrain, I'd go with a selectable locker, like an Eaton E-Locker or ARB Air-locker. That way you have the street manners of an open diff but can lock it up when off road and maintain some traction (very important since you're a 2WD).

 

Just my opinion...let us know what you get and post pics when you do!!

I want to put 33's on my truck. (which I will do in a few weeks) I live In So California and and it is my daily driver. More of just dirt hills, small ruts, and rocks when I go camping in the desert.

 

I can not put 33's unless I get a lift or a leveling kit. I would rather lift my truck but I go on a lot of day dirt bike trips(w/out my trailer). I'm thinking that a 6" lift would increase the difficulty of my bikes in and out of my truck bed.

 

There are a lot of brands of lifts out there. My budget is from $1000-$1600.

 

My other option is a ready lift leveling kit and ready lift 2" block in the back.....

foxman31292 Enthusiast

foxman31292

Posted
Posted

I was in the same boat as you. I have a 02 silverado 1500

 

If i was you i wouldnt go above a 4" lift. I as well ride dirt bikes and it is pretty hard to get that thing in now. I can only imagine how much harder a 6" would be

 

I did a 4" on mine and it looks great running 285/75/16 (basically a 33")

 

I ended up installing a rancho 4" and love it. Rides great and doesnt feel too tall.

 

If you do end up doing a leveling kit in the front all it does it wear out your front end faster and your truck will have a much rougher ride. I would go with a lift

herkdriver007 Enthusiast

herkdriver007

Posted
Posted

FWIW, if you're just wanting 33s, you could go with a 3" body lift, or the level kit you talked about and some minor trimming. With the level kit you'll give up some down travel, but the $$ may be worth it in the end. Otherwise I'd probably go with the 4" if you're wanting a true lift kit, but that might also increase your budget as some require a different offset for the wheels.

 

Best bang for the buck might be the body lift...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • James Beyer
      Trading 7.3 (Godzilla) for G.M.C gas

      By James Beyer · Posted

      Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • KARNUT
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By KARNUT · Posted

      It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...