Jump to content

Were Did You Buy Your Corsa Sport Exaust?


Recommended Posts

Posted
As the title says were did you get you Corsa Sport? I'm searching a ton and can't find a good deal... Help me out!! :rolleyes:

 

check truckcustomizers, AutoAnything, partgeek...

Posted
As the title says were did you get you Corsa Sport? I'm searching a ton and can't find a good deal... Help me out!! :dunno:

 

You might try contacting the folks at LM Perfromance... LM Performance Website . They had the best price when I was looking. However, I didn't see one listed for your '09. But again, I think if you call them they might be able to help. Good luck!

Posted
As the title says were did you get you Corsa Sport? I'm searching a ton and can't find a good deal... Help me out!! :dunno:

 

 

auto anything is where I bought mine got a 15% off deal right now check out their website

Posted

I got mine from LMPerformance for my 09. They had the best price by far. I asked their tech department which part number to order via email, and they told me right away (figured it would put the responsiblity on them if there was a screwup!). Unfortunetly, I no longer have the info on the part number, but it did fit just fine and I love the system!

Posted
As the title says were did you get you Corsa Sport? I'm searching a ton and can't find a good deal... Help me out!! :dunno:

 

 

auto anything is where I bought mine got a 15% off deal right now check out their website

 

 

 

AutoAnything had the best price that I found.

Posted

Thanks for all the replies. I am going to be biting the bullet this week! thanks alot guys. This is why i love this site!

Posted

Summit racing has corsa sport on 14259 for $845.95. No tax if you live outside Ohio and shipping is only $17. This kit only fits 07-08 trucks though.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...