Jump to content

Finally Finished...


Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't need them Yet but I see a BL in my future. Whenever you have time a shopping list would be a big help.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

For the front guards:

 

Description: High-strength multipurpose neoprene rubber, 1/16" thick, 12" x 24", 40a Durometer

Price: $11.55 each

Quantity: 2

McMaster Carr Part Number: 8568K521

 

Description: Nylon Robbed Shank Rivet, 0.250" hole diameter, 0.098"-0.472" material thickness, black

Price: $4.95 (pack of 25)

Quantity: 1

McMaster Carr Part Number: 90221A118

 

 

 

For the rear guards:

Description: ABS Sheet, 1/8" thick

Price: Depends on size purchased (24" x 48" = $44.44)

McMaster Carr Part Number: 8586K262

 

Description: 3/16" aluminum rivets (stainless preferred).

 

I would recommend getting the ABS in a 48" length. I believe my guards are ~39" in length and they could have used another inch or two in hindsight. Also, I made the width of mine ~5.25". IMO shorter doesn't look right. If/when someone wants to do this I can take another picture (closer) and show where I chose to mount them.

 

For the front guards, I cut out small squares of abs and drilled 1/4" holes in them. These small squares were used as "nuts" to sandwich the rubber. This allowed just the heads to be visible on the outside, while providing confidence that the rubber will not back off the plastic rivet.

  • 8 months later...
Posted

right now i have the 2" front leveling kit, and i replaced the rear factory blocks with the 3" readlift blocks, giving a 1.75" rake.

 

in the pictures i have seen with a front leveling kit and a 3" BL, it looks like there is some decent rake.

 

is the BL going to give more lift to the rear than to the front? i already have 1.75" of rake, and i dont think anymore would look that good.

 

i would only go with the 3" BL if it lifted the truck the same in front and in the rear.

 

i am wondering if anyone has knowledge on this. zone said that it will lift everything 3", but by the pictures i am not convinced.

 

thanks!

Posted
right now i have the 2" front leveling kit, and i replaced the rear factory blocks with the 3" readlift blocks, giving a 1.75" rake.

 

in the pictures i have seen with a front leveling kit and a 3" BL, it looks like there is some decent rake.

 

is the BL going to give more lift to the rear than to the front? i already have 1.75" of rake, and i dont think anymore would look that good.

 

i would only go with the 3" BL if it lifted the truck the same in front and in the rear.

 

i am wondering if anyone has knowledge on this. zone said that it will lift everything 3", but by the pictures i am not convinced.

 

thanks!

 

Its a body lift .. it lifts the entire body 3"s all around... Its determined by the fact that the spacers are all 3"..

  • 1 year later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...