Jump to content

Question On My Awd Drivetrain


Recommended Posts

Posted

My drive way has an incline to it. In the winter if it has ice or packed snow on it my old truck in 2hi would slide down the drive. If I put it in 4hi it would lock all 4 wheels in park and stay put.

 

When my new AWD is in park does the drivetrain lock all 4 wheels or just the back ones? I assume the parking brake is still only holding the rear wheels.

Posted

AWD is engaged all the time. There is a power differential from the front to the rear, but the front is always engaged. And yes, the parking brake only sets the rear brakes.

Posted

Isn't the center diff on the AWD systems totally open? If so then I don't think it will act the same way as a truck locked in 4Hi with a locked center diff, it would do the same as a truck in 2WD.

Posted
Isn't the center diff on the AWD systems totally open? If so then I don't think it will act the same way as a truck locked in 4Hi with a locked center diff, it would do the same as a truck in 2WD.

 

No, it would not act like a 2wd.

 

With all 4 tires on the ground it will act just like a 4wd. The front tires wont roll unless the back tires are rolling (unless the transfer is in Neutral).

Posted
Isn't the center diff on the AWD systems totally open? If so then I don't think it will act the same way as a truck locked in 4Hi with a locked center diff, it would do the same as a truck in 2WD.

 

No, it would not act like a 2wd.

 

With all 4 tires on the ground it will act just like a 4wd. The front tires wont roll unless the back tires are rolling (unless the transfer is in Neutral).

 

I'm not so sure- on a traditional 4x4 the t-case/center diff is locked so no matter what, power is split 50/50. This is why you get the binding in turns. On the AWD system, the t-case has an open center diff so I'd imagine the front tires can still spin freely whereas the traditional 4x4 the fronts will be locked because there is no place to "give" between the rear and front axles.

Posted

Even if the center diff is completely open if the rear wheels aren't turning and the transmission is locked then the fronts cannot move. Fully constrained system.

Posted
Isn't the center diff on the AWD systems totally open? If so then I don't think it will act the same way as a truck locked in 4Hi with a locked center diff, it would do the same as a truck in 2WD.

 

No, it would not act like a 2wd.

 

With all 4 tires on the ground it will act just like a 4wd. The front tires wont roll unless the back tires are rolling (unless the transfer is in Neutral).

 

I'm not so sure- on a traditional 4x4 the t-case/center diff is locked so no matter what, power is split 50/50. This is why you get the binding in turns. On the AWD system, the t-case has an open center diff so I'd imagine the front tires can still spin freely whereas the traditional 4x4 the fronts will be locked because there is no place to "give" between the rear and front axles.

 

 

I'm 100% positive they wont spin. I know how the system works.

 

Just like Chris posted above.

Posted
Isn't the center diff on the AWD systems totally open? If so then I don't think it will act the same way as a truck locked in 4Hi with a locked center diff, it would do the same as a truck in 2WD.

 

No, it would not act like a 2wd.

 

With all 4 tires on the ground it will act just like a 4wd. The front tires wont roll unless the back tires are rolling (unless the transfer is in Neutral).

 

I'm not so sure- on a traditional 4x4 the t-case/center diff is locked so no matter what, power is split 50/50. This is why you get the binding in turns. On the AWD system, the t-case has an open center diff so I'd imagine the front tires can still spin freely whereas the traditional 4x4 the fronts will be locked because there is no place to "give" between the rear and front axles.

 

 

I'm 100% positive they wont spin. I know how the system works.

 

Just like Chris posted above.

 

Unless something has changed than it is impossible for the AWD trucks to "act" like a traditional 4x4- the T-case to the best of my knowledge is strictly an open diff so in theory on ice all power could go to one axle.

Posted
Isn't the center diff on the AWD systems totally open? If so then I don't think it will act the same way as a truck locked in 4Hi with a locked center diff, it would do the same as a truck in 2WD.

 

No, it would not act like a 2wd.

 

With all 4 tires on the ground it will act just like a 4wd. The front tires wont roll unless the back tires are rolling (unless the transfer is in Neutral).

 

I'm not so sure- on a traditional 4x4 the t-case/center diff is locked so no matter what, power is split 50/50. This is why you get the binding in turns. On the AWD system, the t-case has an open center diff so I'd imagine the front tires can still spin freely whereas the traditional 4x4 the fronts will be locked because there is no place to "give" between the rear and front axles.

 

 

I'm 100% positive they wont spin. I know how the system works.

 

Just like Chris posted above.

 

Unless something has changed than it is impossible for the AWD trucks to "act" like a traditional 4x4- the T-case to the best of my knowledge is strictly an open diff so in theory on ice all power could go to one axle.

 

 

That's not the question. If the transmission is in park and the back wheels are locked, the front wheels wont roll, period. I don't understand why this is so hard to comprehend.

 

What you're saying it would do is like spinning the rear driveshaft without either of the rear tires spinning... not going to happen. One tire would need to be up in the air for that to happen.

Posted
That's not the question. If the transmission is in park and the back wheels are locked, the front wheels wont roll, period. I don't understand why this is so hard to comprehend.

 

What you're saying it would do is like spinning the rear driveshaft without either of the rear tires spinning... not going to happen. One tire would need to be up in the air for that to happen.

 

This is how I see it-

 

The truck is in park with the e-brake set, the park pawl in the transmission is locked tight as are the back wheels but since the front wheels have an open diff between them and the locked up trans or the rear axle, couldn't the front wheels spin/rotate still?

Posted
That's not the question. If the transmission is in park and the back wheels are locked, the front wheels wont roll, period. I don't understand why this is so hard to comprehend.

 

What you're saying it would do is like spinning the rear driveshaft without either of the rear tires spinning... not going to happen. One tire would need to be up in the air for that to happen.

 

This is how I see it-

 

The truck is in park with the e-brake set, the park pawl in the transmission is locked tight as are the back wheels but since the front wheels have an open diff between them and the locked up trans or the rear axle, couldn't the front wheels spin/rotate still?

 

 

With the tcase being an "open diff", either the rear driveshaft or the transfer would still have to spin for the front driveshaft to rotate.

 

If it was 4wd (or a locked diff for the tcase) then the front driveshaft would only rotate if the rear was also rotating, even if the trans was in neutral. That's the difference.

 

So per the question posed by the OP, the front tires will not roll with the trans in park and the ebrake on.

 

I also have a hunch that you don't need the ebrake on.... not 100% sure on this but I don't believe the tcase will allow the rear driveshaft to spin with the trans in park.

Posted

Center diffs always screwed with my head. I had to stop and think about this one for a minute.

 

In theory if there is no limited slip diff then you only need one wheel to slip in order to roll backwards. BW4485 has 40/60 F/R split.

 

A)If one front wheel were on rollers or ice: For the truck to roll backwards at a wheel rpm of lets say -10 rpm, then a front wheel would be turning forward at 40 rpm (-4 times the travel rpm of the other three wheels).

 

Math:

 

Both rear wheels at -10 rpm so rear carrier turns at the average of the two wheels which is -10. Rear propshaft turns at ring gear * axle ratio(ar) which is -10ar. Park pawl in trans holds center diff carrier so rear prop at -10ar makes front prop turn at -10ar*(-60/40)=15ar. Front carrier spins at 15ar/ar = 15 rpm. Since one front tire is turning -10rpm and the front carrier is turning 15rpm then the slipping front tire is turning 40 rpm because 15 is the average of -10 and 40.

 

B)If one rear wheel were on rollers for the truck to roll backwards at -10 then one rear wheel would be spinning forward at 23 1/3 rpm or negative two and two thirds the travel rpm of the other 3 wheels.

 

Same math but rear prop turns at -10ar*(-40/60) which is 6 2/3 rpm. Thus with one rear tire rolling backwards at -10rpm then the other rear tire is going forward at 23 1/3 rpm.

 

By this logic if any one tire can spin the truck will roll backwards. If the park brake is on holding both rear tires then the vehicle will only roll backward if both rear tires and one front tire slips.

Posted
Center diffs always screwed with my head. I had to stop and think about this one for a minute.

 

In theory if there is no limited slip diff then you only need one wheel to slip in order to roll backwards. BW4485 has 40/60 F/R split.

 

A)If one front wheel were on rollers or ice: For the truck to roll backwards at a wheel rpm of lets say -10 rpm, then a front wheel would be turning forward at 40 rpm (-4 times the travel rpm of the other three wheels).

 

Math:

 

Both rear wheels at -10 rpm so rear carrier turns at the average of the two wheels which is -10. Rear propshaft turns at ring gear * axle ratio(ar) which is -10ar. Park pawl in trans holds center diff carrier so rear prop at -10ar makes front prop turn at -10ar*(-60/40)=15ar. Front carrier spins at 15ar/ar = 15 rpm. Since one front tire is turning -10rpm and the front carrier is turning 15rpm then the slipping front tire is turning 40 rpm because 15 is the average of -10 and 40.

 

B)If one rear wheel were on rollers for the truck to roll backwards at -10 then one rear wheel would be spinning forward at 23 1/3 rpm or negative two and two thirds the travel rpm of the other 3 wheels.

 

Same math but rear prop turns at -10ar*(-40/60) which is 6 2/3 rpm. Thus with one rear tire rolling backwards at -10rpm then the other rear tire is going forward at 23 1/3 rpm.

 

By this logic if any one tire can spin the truck will roll backwards. If the park brake is on holding both rear tires then the vehicle will only roll backward if both rear tires and one front tire slips.

 

 

And this is why we have engineers.

 

 

 

:)

Posted
In theory if there is no limited slip diff then you only need one wheel to slip in order to roll backwards. BW4485 has 40/60 F/R split.

 

This is not true.

 

Let's make this simple.

 

2WD truck with an OPEN rear differential. If you put the truck in park and jack one tire off the ground, it will NOT spin. Therefore, if you were parked on an incline with the other tire on a perfect frictionless piece of ice, the truck will not roll backwards.

 

Just because a differential is "open" doesn't mean you can spin any of the 3 rotaries (two wheels and a driveshaft) at any given time. TWO always need to be free to allow rotation.

 

In that 2WD truck i mentioned, if you jacked one wheel up and put the trans in neutral, then the tire would spin and so would the driveshaft. Edit, And if you were in Park and jacked both rear tires off the ground, they would spin in different directions.

 

Also, you did a whole lot of math for nothing. 60/40 torque split is not the same as 60/40 RPM split. The front and rear driveshaft spin at the same RPM, not 60/40 RPM (hence, the front and rear differentials have the same gear ratio).

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
    • // Thank you, also for your  response. More information is always good. This 2013 GMC is most likely my 'forever truck"-I'm 77 and retired...and truck only has 42K on it-very clean-so I try to keep it that way.  Tks again for your  response- glenn
    • I started my install this weekend. Everything was pretty straight forward but I ran into one issue with running power through the firewall. The nipple grommet on my High Country already has a small harness running through it - has anyone else ran into this issue? And on the engine bay side, does the wire basically just penetrate the factory wiring boot? I did this on my '22 Trail Boss and it seems much easier but thats been a few years. My other thought would be possibly drilling a new hole adding a rubber grommet just to the lower left of the factory hole. Thoughts?   Has anyone used a T-harness off the Bose amp and obtained power from there? It seems a little odd that such a small amp needs 3 power leads
    • ///// Ok--Thanks for that info--I could not find yesterday when I looked for the specs on that NAPA filter what I wanted. Their website is not very user friendly. I buy all teh filters for  our three vehicles once or twice a year. Have always run NAPA Gold on everything I own....I buy it thru my Son's account for his business-which he has a Heavy Equipment repair shop-one reason he uses NAPA so much-they have such a full line of coverage for just about anything/anywhere- He gets s  good discount because of volume bought. Anyway-Thank you -Sir for your response.   glenn
    • It is possible to add your own 12v outlet to your truck.  Check out this video:   I verified via GM Upfitters that pin 31 is the same on the 1500 trucks.  The wire is GM part number 84779405.   You can get the GM 12v outlet from Amazon  https://www.amazon.com/Genuine-Accessory-Receptacle-25774623-13549530/dp/B0F1H9YRGF EWAY 12 Volt Power Adapter for GM   https://www.amazon.com/EWAY-Chevrolet-Silverado-Cigarette-Ignition/dp/B0915RRW6Q/ref=sr_1_1?   I just haven't figured out a good place to put the 12v outlet in my truck.   Some people are getting USB-C to 12V adapters  https://www.amazon.com/WYMECT-Cigarette-Lighter-Socket-Adapter/dp/B0F87WNQKB/ref=sr_1_1_sspa? Not sure if they provide the correct amperage that a device like a tire inflator would need.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...