Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This question concerns the supersession of part numbers for replacement OEM factory pleated paper air filters for use in stock GM air boxes in LQ4 and LQ9 6.0L 8 cylinder engines with RPO K47 High Capacity air cleaners fitted.

 

Model Years 2000-2006

GM Original Equipment Part Number: 25313349

AC/Delco OEM equivalent/replacement: A1518C

 

 

Model Years 2007-2010

GM Original Equipment Part Number: 15908915

AC/Delco OEM equivalent/replacement: A3085C

 

 

Some GM dealership parts counters report that the later listed filter (A3085C) SUPERCEDES the former listed filter (A1518C). These dealerships no longer offer the original A1518C for sale, and automatically issue the newer A3085C as a replacement even for older vehicle (2000-2006) applications.

 

However, other GM dealership parts counters continue to sell and suggest the original A1518C, and claim no knowledge of any supersession in their computers for older applications. This is what is troubling... the disparity in the reports from equally credible sources, presumably with equal access to the GM "mothership" of information resources.

 

I have both filters in my possession, and have observed that while both filters are indeed interchangeable from a fitment standpoint, they are constructed SLIGHTLY differently. The differences are subtle, barely significant enough to notice.

 

Another difference is cost... in every instance where price comparisons were available from the same vendor, either online or on the ground, the later A3085C is cheaper than the earlier A1518C. This makes one wonder if the newer A3085C filter was merely redesigned to reduce manufacturing costs, thrifting out some engineering benefits formerly found in the A1518C filter?

 

On the other hand, upon physical inspection, it appears the newer A3085C filter has some SLIGHT differences that have some possible benefits over the A1518C filter, such as:

 

1. Pillowed Pleating - corrugated air pillow bumps integrated in the construction of the pleat and arranged to match, high point to high point, adjacent pleats. These rows of linear pillows formed into the pleats themselves maintain space separation between pleats to prevent pleat collapse and sandwiching together under suction. When pleats become sandwiched together, originally designed surface area is reduced, so to the extent that an even amount of space can be maintained between each individual pleat, both the dirt trapping capacity as well as the flow rate of the filter can be better maintained. I first became aware of this technology from an air filter engineer working at Wix, at a time when new pleat formulation technologies (superior to plain flat surfaces) were being invented and implemented for turbodiesel engine panel filter applications in light trucks. There is corrugation in the A1518C filter media as well, but it doesn't seem as pronounced as it is in the A3085C.

 

2. Pleat Count: 110 pleats in the A3085C, 102 pleats in the A1518C.

 

3. Expanded metal wire mesh: Thicker wire, but larger spaces in the A3085C. Smaller wire, but tighter spaced in the A1518C.

 

4. Gasket: The newer A3085C has a subtly wider bulb seal on the perimeter bead, a much wider formed land at the inside of the perimeter bulb seal, and less gasket spillover on the wire mesh at the inside of the formed land, than the A1518C.

 

 

I am not an air filter engineer or expert, so I don't know if these observations are relevant or worthy for consideration in comparing these air filters. I posted what I have observed and learned in order to inspire your curiosity and inquisitiveness if you are interested, and perhaps you will find out more, and post it here, and we can all eventually learn which filter is best to use.

 

IF there was not a discrepancy between different GM dealerships consulted, I wouldn't bother asking this questions. It would be a no-brainer, I'd just go with GM's recommendations. But since I don't know which GM source to believe, and they differ, I put the question to you. The owners manual suggests the A1518C. What have you heard about the original high capacity air filter (25313349 - A1518C) for GMT800 6.0 liter engines being superseded by the newer air filter (15908915 - A3085C) used in the GMT900?

 

Thanks!

 

 

(PS... CAI's are not an option or interest. There are plenty of other topics on this forum about cold air intakes from GMPP, K&N, Volant, and other aftermarket companies. I searched for air filters here, and that is all that comes up... various CAIs. So please let this topic remain exclusively dedicated to GM and AC/Delco factory replacement air filters for use in the stock air box)

Posted

Don't know the answer to your question, but the high capacity air filter has nothing to do with air flow but has more pleats and holds more dirt. The standard and high capacity filters are the same size. Also the filter housing is the same no matter what filter you have.

  • 5 years later...
Posted (edited)

This question concerns the supersession of part numbers for replacement OEM factory pleated paper air filters for use in stock GM air boxes in LQ4 and LQ9 6.0L 8 cylinder engines with RPO K47 High Capacity air cleaners fitted.

 

Model Years 2000-2006

GM Original Equipment Part Number: 25313349

AC/Delco OEM equivalent/replacement: A1518C

 

 

Model Years 2007-2010

GM Original Equipment Part Number: 15908915

AC/Delco OEM equivalent/replacement: A3085C

 

 

Some GM dealership parts counters report that the later listed filter (A3085C) SUPERCEDES the former listed filter (A1518C). These dealerships no longer offer the original A1518C for sale, and automatically issue the newer A3085C as a replacement even for older vehicle (2000-2006) applications.

 

However, other GM dealership parts counters continue to sell and suggest the original A1518C, and claim no knowledge of any supersession in their computers for older applications. This is what is troubling... the disparity in the reports from equally credible sources, presumably with equal access to the GM "mothership" of information resources.

 

I have both filters in my possession, and have observed that while both filters are indeed interchangeable from a fitment standpoint, they are constructed SLIGHTLY differently. The differences are subtle, barely significant enough to notice.

 

Another difference is cost... in every instance where price comparisons were available from the same vendor, either online or on the ground, the later A3085C is cheaper than the earlier A1518C. This makes one wonder if the newer A3085C filter was merely redesigned to reduce manufacturing costs, thrifting out some engineering benefits formerly found in the A1518C filter?

 

On the other hand, upon physical inspection, it appears the newer A3085C filter has some SLIGHT differences that have some possible benefits over the A1518C filter, such as:

 

1. Pillowed Pleating - corrugated air pillow bumps integrated in the construction of the pleat and arranged to match, high point to high point, adjacent pleats. These rows of linear pillows formed into the pleats themselves maintain space separation between pleats to prevent pleat collapse and sandwiching together under suction. When pleats become sandwiched together, originally designed surface area is reduced, so to the extent that an even amount of space can be maintained between each individual pleat, both the dirt trapping capacity as well as the flow rate of the filter can be better maintained. I first became aware of this technology from an air filter engineer working at Wix, at a time when new pleat formulation technologies (superior to plain flat surfaces) were being invented and implemented for turbodiesel engine panel filter applications in light trucks. There is corrugation in the A1518C filter media as well, but it doesn't seem as pronounced as it is in the A3085C.

 

2. Pleat Count: 110 pleats in the A3085C, 102 pleats in the A1518C.

 

3. Expanded metal wire mesh: Thicker wire, but larger spaces in the A3085C. Smaller wire, but tighter spaced in the A1518C.

 

4. Gasket: The newer A3085C has a subtly wider bulb seal on the perimeter bead, a much wider formed land at the inside of the perimeter bulb seal, and less gasket spillover on the wire mesh at the inside of the formed land, than the A1518C.

 

 

I am not an air filter engineer or expert, so I don't know if these observations are relevant or worthy for consideration in comparing these air filters. I posted what I have observed and learned in order to inspire your curiosity and inquisitiveness if you are interested, and perhaps you will find out more, and post it here, and we can all eventually learn which filter is best to use.

 

IF there was not a discrepancy between different GM dealerships consulted, I wouldn't bother asking this questions. It would be a no-brainer, I'd just go with GM's recommendations. But since I don't know which GM source to believe, and they differ, I put the question to you. The owners manual suggests the A1518C. What have you heard about the original high capacity air filter (25313349 - A1518C) for GMT800 6.0 liter engines being superseded by the newer air filter (15908915 - A3085C) used in the GMT900?

 

Thanks!

 

 

(PS... CAI's are not an option or interest. There are plenty of other topics on this forum about cold air intakes from GMPP, K&N, Volant, and other aftermarket companies. I searched for air filters here, and that is all that comes up... various CAIs. So please let this topic remain exclusively dedicated to GM and AC/Delco factory replacement air filters for use in the stock air box)

 

And now it would appear that the AC Delco A3085C (Hi Capacity air filter on the RPO K47 equipped trucks like the GMT900 Z71's) and the A3086C (standard capacity air filter on the GMT900) have been superseded by the newer AC Delco A3181C.

 

I'm guessing the A3181C doesn't have as many pleats as the old 'hi capacity' A3085C used to have, but it looks like it is the same price. Funny how that works.

 

DANG, I never discover these changes until it is too late to go buy a big bunch of the older, 'better' ones (like when the PF48 oil filters changed to the e-cores)!

Edited by Maverick Z71
  • Like 1
  • 3 years later...
Posted

I'm trying to decide between the A3181c and A3085c air filter for a 2011 Sierra, 5.3 engine.  I don't know, maybe I'm splitting hairs here.  95% of my driving is highway (non dusty) conditions.  The difference of 8 pleats may not be that big a deal.  But still I'm wondering which way to go.  Anyone got a suggestion?

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Jworks said:

I'm trying to decide between the A3181c and A3085c air filter for a 2011 Sierra, 5.3 engine.  I don't know, maybe I'm splitting hairs here.  95% of my driving is highway (non dusty) conditions.  The difference of 8 pleats may not be that big a deal.  But still I'm wondering which way to go.  Anyone got a suggestion?

You ought to post the question a few more times

 

Both filters will fit and "be proper"...your choice as to which one you want to use based on your driving conditions (normal around town/highway driving, get the OEM...off road/dusty conditions, get the heavy duty service...only about 30¢ difference at RockAuto)

A3181C is GM OEM filter

A3085C is heavy duty service filter

 

 

Untitled.jpg

Edited by dsr611
Posted
On 12/20/2020 at 4:09 PM, Jworks said:

I'm trying to decide between the A3181c and A3085c air filter for a 2011 Sierra, 5.3 engine.  I don't know, maybe I'm splitting hairs here.  95% of my driving is highway (non dusty) conditions.  The difference of 8 pleats may not be that big a deal.  But still I'm wondering which way to go.  Anyone got a suggestion?

I run the A3085C, flows great.  But it ain't the best:

 

 

Posted

1999-2016 GM dropped the standard filter.  The OE standard filter # supersedes to the high capacity filter in their system.  Its the only one we've stocked at work for 10 years now.  

 

The AC Delco "Professional" line might have both available as one of the aftermarket filter manufacturers is what is really in the box.  The AC Delco "OE" filter is the OE high cap.   

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,739
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    JimmyB4
    Newest Member
    JimmyB4
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 568 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Are you going to take long trips in it?  If so, try out the seats in the various trims. For me the lower trim level seats were not comfortable. 
    • I have a 2016 that I bought new and still own. I'm around 129,000 miles now. The biggest problem was a transmission failure about 2 years ago around 95000 miles. No warning, just failed while driving down a back road. A reman GM transmission installed and it's been fine ever since. A few other minor problems along the way. I am in no hurry to replace it. It's been paid off long ago and do plan on driving this as long as I can.   I will admit I am leery about all the additional electronics in the newer models and feel that it is just more potential problems. I think there's actually more than I would have wanted in this 2016 but so far so good. I think even if something major like lifter failure happened, it would still be cheaper to at worst, drop a new engine in than buy a new vehicle. 
    • I’ve own several successful businesses. I’ve bought homes and lived in different states. I’d witness several generations buy homes and survive in different economic circumstances. You get awful sippy when people have different experiences than you do. You live a life. I’ve lived a life. It seems our experience has been different. You can point out generalized statistics. Some people learn how to thrive when the odds are against them. Living in different states does make a difference in a persons quality of life and economic outcomes and opportunities. That’s a fact Jack. It’s my truth, my life. Hard work and long hours the right environment made my families life easier. And yes moving to a different state increased the odds of that happening. Stats are generalized. People who thrive don’t make excuses. They beat the odds. Others get mad and point to those statistics. I guess that’s you. My post pointed out how you helped people beat the odds. Somehow your panties got in a wad. Go figure. 
    • Good question, I don't remember for sure but I believe it was the HD. I will check and get back to you.
    • Point of the post sir was that while both wages and cost are rising EVERYWHERE; the cost is rising faster EVERYWHERE than the ability to buy EVERYWHERE. We're not going down the location rabbit hole. I'm aware of what economic migration is. I've lived in four states including Texas.   It's what "Purchasing Power" means.   I'm not telling you what I think. I'm telling what the government, your government, data shows.   It wasn't an argument. It wasn't a suggestion. It was a statement of FACT. You are absolutely entitled to your own opinion. Your not entitled to your own facts. If you and I were, they wouldn't be facts.    fact /făkt/   noun Knowledge or information based on real occurrences. "an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy." Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed. "Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact." A real occurrence; an event. "had to prove the facts of the case." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at Wordnik   If you'd like to disagree call your Senator or Representative and let him know his departments are in error. But you and I? We are not doing this. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...