Jump to content

Oil Weights Fix Consumption?


Recommended Posts

Posted

All engines consume oil while running old or new. Since you havent told us how much oil you are using i am going to say that 1 qt 3000 is normal. Heavier viscosity will not solve a problem.

Posted

Heavier oil weight can help with oil consumption with some higher mileage vehicles that might burn some oil. I run 10w40 in my old Jeep to help with the noisy straight 6 and with any burning issues. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that 5w30 and 10w30 will be the exact same weight at normal operating temperature, but the 10w30 is heavier at initial cold start. I may have that backwards though....I try to stay with what the manual says though because GM has selected 5w30 for a reason. How much are you losing?

Posted
Heavier oil weight can help with oil consumption with some higher mileage vehicles that might burn some oil. I run 10w40 in my old Jeep to help with the noisy straight 6 and with any burning issues. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that 5w30 and 10w30 will be the exact same weight at normal operating temperature, but the 10w30 is heavier at initial cold start. I may have that backwards though....I try to stay with what the manual says though because GM has selected 5w30 for a reason. How much are you losing?

 

You're right. 5w30 and 10w30 are a 30 weight oil when at opperating temp. If you are burning an excessive ammount of oil, changing to a heavier weight wont solve the problem.

Posted

Some people will run a heavier oil in harsh and warm climates for extra protection or peace of mind. I am a firm believer in being consistent with brand and weight of oil. Even in the white hot heat of a 1,000 suns here in Texas I feel comfortable with 5w30. In any case, I digress...

Posted
I have used about 1qt in 3k miles. I have never had another vehicle consume that much oil before.

 

That's not really that bad. I think both Ford and GM state that 1 qt every 1,000 miles is within spec. I also do not think a new vehicle should use oil, but apparently it happens. I can however understand 100,000+ miles and some oil usage.

Posted

Using a thicker weight oil is not a good idea on any vehicle if the manufacturer specs do not say it is approved. One of the biggest reasons behind this is that there are small passages in the engine where oil NEEDS to get to for lubricating, and the thicker oil won't make it. This is particularly true on many of the Asian engines, some of the European, and a few American engines.

Posted

Before using different weights why not try different brands of oils. Some have had success.

Posted

Give a look at the different oil catch can setups throughout this board. Might not save you from loosing the oil but at least it will help keep most of it from being sucked into the combustion chamber.

Posted

I will check that out. I had an 07 Ram with the MDS and it never used any oil. If I am burning a qt per 3k miles I can probably learn to live with that but if it gets worse over time I will be dissapointed.

Posted
Before using different weights why not try different brands of oils. Some have had success.

 

 

 

+ Good point! I've heard of Mobil 1 helping with oil consumption. I haven't had any oil consumption problems, but I do use Mobil 1. GM puts Mobil 1 in Corvettes, and many Corvette owners stick with it. Corvette owners are very serious about their cars so I often pay attention to what they use.

Posted

Try a different brand of oil. All oils are subject to volatility. API spec's the limit for volatility at 15% and most oil will be at or the near that 15%. Synthetic oils can be less but not necessarily as to reduce that % takes more expensive additives and even at that, 5-10% is the range for a GOOD synthetic oil. Most oils will never publish what % their oil is, rarely are any under 10%. So its normal for oil to evaporate, some worse than others and 15% loss is considered NORMAL.

 

6 qts x .15 = 0.90 qt

 

The 100% synthetic I use is at 7%.

 

 

NOACK Volatility

 

ASTM D5800 - 08 Standard Test Method for Evaporation Loss of Lubricating Oils by the NOACK Method

 

NOACK volatility determines the evaporative loss of engine oils. This test is important because the operating temperatures of an engine will typically drive off the lighter ends of a lubricant while in service. This effectively results in pushing the viscosity of the lubricant to a more viscous level (up) and, as a result, fuel economy goes down due to an increase in parasitic load.

 

The evaporation loss is of particular importance in engine lubrication. Where high temperatures occur, portions of an oil can evaporate. Evaporation may contribute to oil consumption in an engine and can lead to a change in the properties of an oil.

Posted

when i had my 91 s-10, i ran 10w30 and it eased oil consumption enough that it was tolerable during the 3k oil change interval....but as stated it only helps really during start up( the tired 4.3 would burp some oil at start up) but i switched to 5w30 on accident and the valve cover seals began to seep...:D i just 5w30 in my silvy because its recommended

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,842
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    CaptainDad
    Newest Member
    CaptainDad
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 484 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...