Jump to content

2011 Silverado 1500Lt 4" Lift Kit


Recommended Posts

Posted

I am looking into lifting my 2011 silverado 4" so I can run 33x12.5 tires. I have seen three different kinds of lifts.

 

There is the rancho 4" Lift. It looks like the best quality and I like the fact that the subframe and a few other components are powdercoated red. It would look nice on my red truck. Need to file existing subframe and drill tranny crossmember. 1500$)+ shocks

 

Then there is the ready lift kit that takes advantages of stock components but does not seem to have the quality of the rancho lift. Direct Bolt On1000$

 

There is also a tuff country lift. Never heard of them but seems to be a decent lift kit. 1550$ with shocks

 

They all claim to keep factory ride quality. I think that the lifts that utilize the subframe would be better than the lifts with huge spacers and control arms....But what I think doesnt mean anything especially since I have zero experience with IFS lifts. I personally like the rancho. Just kind of curious to what other peoples opinions, thoughts, or experiences were.

 

Also looking at MBRP SS dual cat back exhaust and and K&N cold air intake. With a 4" lift, 33x12.5 tires, and these accessories what should I expect out of gas mileage? I know one guy on here said 2 to 4 mpg drop but I am not even sure what my mpg is yet. Just broke 500 miles. I dont drive like an old lady but I dont floor it every time I take off either. I would say im a normal driver.

 

Thanks For any Replies!

Posted

I have the 4" BDS kit on my 2009 crew cab and I am very pleased. I also like the Rancho kit. I believe there is also a CST 4" kit and I may be mistaken but I think it keeps the factory track width.

 

Overall I am pleased with my lift. If I wanted to go to 6" in the future its something that I can do with a few replacement parts from BDS. The Rancho kit measures a bit closer to a 6" kit so look carefully at the pictures to see if thats what you want. I have used Rancho products in the past and always liked them. I thought about it for this truck but tried the BDS instead.

Posted

You can' t go wrong with Rancho, BDS, or CST. You are correct in your assumption about the Ready Lift kit though. It's a glorified leveling kit that rides rough and doesn't properly correct front end angles. IMO go with Rancho for some added height and less rubbing.

Posted

I have the 4" BDS kit on my 2009 crew cab and I am very pleased. I also like the Rancho kit. I believe there is also a CST 4" kit and I may be mistaken but I think it keeps the factory track width.

 

Overall I am pleased with my lift. If I wanted to go to 6" in the future its something that I can do with a few replacement parts from BDS. The Rancho kit measures a bit closer to a 6" kit so look carefully at the pictures to see if thats what you want. I have used Rancho products in the past and always liked them. I thought about it for this truck but tried the BDS instead.

 

There is a 4" CST and it does keep the factory track width. I have it super kit, but probably the most expensive 4" out there

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=134529&st=0&p=1185187entry1185187

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 251 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • With large equipment or deep mud it is more of a use the higher gear to avoid spinning tires, getting stuck because of spinning tires and doing damage to your machine. The idea is if you run out of torque before you spin tires you can still downshift for more torque. If you are just spinning your tires in the lowest available gear you are stuck and things break.   Automatic transmissions, traction control and electronic transfer cases change the calculation a little as you the driver have less control over each piece. 
    • are there any codes? with lots of rust, perhaps disconnect/clean both sides of the connection/examine cable ends (the wires) for corrosion going into the sheath & replace if necessary/reconnect ALL the power AND ground cables between the battery, engine, frame, cab, fuse box and starter charm.li (website) has a no-start diagnostic procedure you can work through to get it working.
    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...