Jump to content

2009 Silverado 1500 5.3L


Recommended Posts

Posted

Howdy,

 

Like everything else I'm sure this has been discussed already but oh well...

I'm looking into gettng a programmer for my truck listed in the title. I'm deciding between diablosport and superchip flashpaq. Everything I've read people always say "screw handheld, go custom". I'm not going custom so please don't mention it, I want a programmer that allows me to switch between tunes particularly one for power and one for economy (<---most important) and also one that allows me to go back and restore the factory tune. I would like yall's input ESPECIALLY if you have had first hand experience with either. Thanks in advance.

S7C

Posted

Welcome to the site. First off, you can still get a custom tune and the Autocal device with will duplicate what your trying to do from Blackbear performance. But if thats STILL not the route you want to do, either choice will work. I used Diablo Sport prior to my BB tune and it worked but the BB tune was better.

Posted

So you can get an actual handheld device with the Blackbear custom tunes? I was under the impression that a custom tune is a single tune by itself with no way to change back urself unless you go back to the shop. Also I thought the custom tunes were more on the power side, not necessarily for fuel economy. And don't you have to strictly run premium fuel on a custom?

Posted

Justin at Blackbear will offer you an 87 octane tune and a 91+ octane tune, with different options that you want. AutoCal is the way to go.

Posted

So you can get an actual handheld device with the Blackbear custom tunes? I was under the impression that a custom tune is a single tune by itself with no way to change back urself unless you go back to the shop. Also I thought the custom tunes were more on the power side, not necessarily for fuel economy. And don't you have to strictly run premium fuel on a custom?

 

 

No, you can switch tunes with Autocal, and your not stuck running premium fuel. Full flexability :thumbs:

Posted

I started with a hypertech max energy tuner, and for $380 i was disappointed, so i returned it with a couple of days after trying it, for an addition 169 i went with BB. customer service is awesome the tune is awesome. fuel mileage went up 1-2 mpg. its cold out in VT so fuel mileage has dropped again due to warming up the vehicle

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I agree. That`s a LOT of sludge for 12,000 miles. I tossed that out here since this is an OCI thread. There`s tons of people here that do not post.   I used to work on a city fleet. That includes police cars and fire trucks. Lesson is, not to only use the odo for oci. A police car has a ton of hours on the engine for the miles it shows. And, not just idling, directing traffic. They beat on these things.   Course, since it is a Kia, they were gonna use the "100,000 mile warranty" for their OCI.😉
    • CLASS ACTION SUITS?  Does anyone know if there is already a class action suit for the paint - which was to have been fixed, changed in after the 2020 GM vehicles?  Does it look like this?    Just started 3 weeks ago - No help from GM as of yet - Dealer will not assist in speaking with GM on my behalf. Confirmed it is the paint they use along with the way the put it on that causes it to fail.  Clearly a Manufacturer's Defect. 
    • That dog don't hunt. 😏   First, a 2025 with 12K on the clock AND idled for a year nonstop is false on it's face; this is 2026. You can do one or the other but not both.    Second, ENGINE HOURS are absolutely available. The rest is third grade math. Micky Mouse scanner he got out of a box of Cracker Jacks OR an ID10T error.    Third, if they ran it out of oil "Several times" that motor is boned on the first hit.    Does this guy think piling higher makes it stink less? 
    • That's interesting, I assume that would add to the cost of the oil but also I was forgetting to bring up the issue of the low tension rings allowing more oil past which in turn forces the cats to have more oil additives pass through them that wouldn't otherwise so they are creating that problem and of course its all in the name of fuel economy. Mind you the other issue would be the lack of additives that fight the formation of carbon within the piston ring grooves which turn the engine into an oil burner and with in this GM forums case is your average off the shelf Dexos licensed oil, meanwhile the other off the shelf oil being Valvoline's R&P isn't licensed and the only one that is which is that certain Mobil oil that came out recently ( its not even being marketed in Canada ) and only a fraction of vehicle owners are going to be using it out of all the other oils on the shelf or the quickie lube bay that meet the Dexos spec by way of actual licensing.    Also I suspect that its an easy excuse to pool the non turbo DI engines in with the turbo DI engines and design the oil to not have LSPI issues in the most demanding engines and short change the naturally aspirated DI by not offering a higher concentration of additive package they could handle and still not be at risk of LSPI.    I wonder if Amsoil flipped the switch just lately and did whatever packaging designation at the same time as I wonder what oil formulation I would have bought in May, of course I don't know when it was packaged at the factory vs how long it was in storage at the Edmonton warehouse. I know its been said at least in the past that the big players switch over to a reformulated oil but the packaging has not changed until they make that move as well so there is that cross over time where its a new formulation in a predated formula marked package. 
    • Hmm. A real reason to not just use the odometer to determine OCI?    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...