Jump to content

Help wiring Camera Source Camera 2007 GMC

tanked_darren

Recommended Posts

tanked_darren Senior Enthusiast

tanked_darren

Posted
Posted

2007 GMC Sierra 1500 W/T

 

I ordered the ogm1 and got a back up camera (camera source) anyways the instructions are confusing about the junction block under the driverside dash. Basically the 2 wires don't exist (well the dark blue reverse one at least) it says X14 1 pin is a ground, not sure if I trust anymore of this appendix because the wire isn't there. The appendix says 2008-2012 I got a late 2007. I guess things where different for the half year? Or am I missing something?

 

PICTURES:

 

 

THE DIAGRAM:

 

IMAG0076.jpg

 

WHAT I GOT

 

IMAG0075.jpg

IMAG0070.jpg

montyss Enthusiast

montyss

Posted
Posted

there is a plug that goes in the X14 to get the power , look up retained accesory power .

the upfitters use that spot on the distribution block

here it is

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=109163&hl=RAP how-to on NBS&st=0

and the GM part # for the plug is 20791502

check the back side of the block fort the dark blue wire it may not be on the front side

TGS New Member

TGS

Posted
Posted

you need to get QUICK DISCONNECT FEMALE .110 TERMINAL and that will plug one the spade on the block . I purchased mine from ebay they work well

tanked_darren Senior Enthusiast

tanked_darren

Posted
  • Author
Posted

there is a plug that goes in the X14 to get the power , look up retained accesory power .

the upfitters use that spot on the distribution block

here it is

http://www.gm-trucks...on NBS&st=0

and the GM part # for the plug is 20791502

check the back side of the block fort the dark blue wire it may not be on the front side

 

AS FOR X10

Great! I was confused until I read the last part of your post. I need X10 PIN 8 for reverse power as per diagram and there was no wire out the front I will check the back tomorrow. Could I stick the wire in the front instead of splicing the wire if I get reverse power there?

 

AS FOR X14

Can I just use a spade connector instead?

I only need X14 for a ground (PIN 1). But after reading that thread Im also re routing my SIRIUS dock and play to above dash and while Im at it I want to get rid of the static I get from using a cigarrette lighter behind the dash (piggy backed off a dash cig lighter) and I think I got my answer to that with this X14 plug! Now to figure out how to split the sirius 12v plug into 2 wires....

 

 

you need to get QUICK DISCONNECT FEMALE .110 TERMINAL and that will plug one the spade on the block . I purchased mine from ebay they work well

 

That would be if I avoided the Plug completely and went for the one ground spade I need? (X14 1 pin)

tanked_darren Senior Enthusiast

tanked_darren

Posted
  • Author
Posted

montyss you really cleared this whole thing up for me thanks a lot for the help!

 

Sent from my Nokia 5190 using Tapatalk 2

wottenad Enthusiast

wottenad

Posted
Posted

2007 GMC Sierra 1500 W/T

 

I ordered the ogm1 and got a back up camera (camera source) anyways the instructions are confusing about the junction block under the driverside dash. Basically the 2 wires don't exist (well the dark blue reverse one at least) it says X14 1 pin is a ground, not sure if I trust anymore of this appendix because the wire isn't there. The appendix says 2008-2012 I got a late 2007. I guess things where different for the half year? Or am I missing something?

 

 

The reverse light feed should be a dark blue wire in position P1 in the X1 connector on the BACK of the junction block (see below, middle image - WARNING: the pin position listing below shows the pin assignments & wiring for a 2011 Silverado - presented here to show the similarity to 2007 schematic assignments).

 

According to the schematic (below) for the 2007 Silverado, reverse 12v should ALSO be in X10, pin 8. For that matter, it should be dark blue at the BCM connector X5 (BROWN PLUG) in pin 11...

 

07_silverado_backup.gif

left_ip_rear.JPG

 

 

x1.jpg

tanked_darren Senior Enthusiast

tanked_darren

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Walt (if that's you) thanks for your reply I found the blue wire in the back and have it all figured out. Contacting you was my last resort. monty helped me figure it out through pm I forgot how these junction blocks work. I'm gonna use a gm female connector to plug into the front of the junction for reverse power and a small spade female connector for ground in X14. As opposed to piggy backing wires.

 

Sent from my Nokia 5190 using Tapatalk 2

  • 1 year later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • SoCal Angler
      Parking Brake - Automatic Engagement Questions

      By SoCal Angler · Posted

      2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...