Jump to content

Sierra with DVP525 supercharger and Corsa exhaust.


Dj0nes

Recommended Posts

Posted

Found this on Corsa Performance and thought everyone would like to see. It's a 5.3-

 

 

 

Made some good ground hp

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Gains are nice, but the numbers seem uncharacteristically low for a dynojet though and the graph starts at about 4000 rpms. I'd lock the tranny in gear so it doesn't down shift and lock the convertor so there isn't any excessive torque multiplies skewing the graph. 2 keystrokes.

Posted

Gains are nice, but the numbers seem uncharacteristically low for a dynojet though and the graph starts at about 4000 rpms. I'd lock the tranny in gear so it doesn't down shift and lock the convertor so there isn't any excessive torque multiplies skewing the graph. 2 keystrokes.

Agree and the smoothing was 3 and not 5 which will skew the numbers also.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Interesting.

From what I'm hearing/seeing, the 6.2 makes pretty similar power to that bone stock (360ish whp).

Not sure why someone would dump all the dough at the 5.3

Posted

Interesting.

 

From what I'm hearing/seeing, the 6.2 makes pretty similar power to that bone stock (360ish whp).

 

Not sure why someone would dump all the dough at the 5.3

I'm thinking it's because they want more power. Don't quote me on that, I could be wrong.

Posted

I'd say that's right on par, judging from baseline run, 100-120 hp gain with a blower is pretty much standard. Dynojet usually read high too...

Posted

I'd say that's right on par, judging from baseline run, 100-120 hp gain with a blower is pretty much standard. Dynojet usually read high too...

No! Mustang reads low.

And the war begins, lol!

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Either way, 100-120 gain is just about right for a blower

 

Agree. The volumetric efficiency increased 60% or so.....although on our C5 Z06, the ATI procharger with a centrifugal blow improved over 140whp. It uses 2 seperate intercoolers, and themdynamically is about 20% more efficient then other frontmount designs.

Posted

Interesting.

From what I'm hearing/seeing, the 6.2 makes pretty similar power to that bone stock (360ish whp).

Not sure why someone would dump all the dough at the 5.3

Because they can- I had a Silverado SS w/ 506 @ the wheels AWD w/ APracing Brakes, Hotchkis frt & rear, etc, etc,etc But why did I? Cause I could. I've built over 15 vehicles to different stages of tune.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...