Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I have a 6.2L with 3.42 gears. Do I have the 9.75 axle (because I have a 6.2L) or do I have the 9.5 axle?

Hope it's not a stupid question, looked around didn't find a clear answer. If there is a topic about this can someone post a link.

Edited by txab
edit title
Posted

Unless you have the NHT tax trailering package, you have the 9.5" axle.

 

 

Are you sure? Because i thought that until i seen this (picture below), and thats not the only add I've seen say that.

 

image

Posted (edited)

I went through the website you posted. But it didn't really say anything about the size the 6.2L came with, just the ratio

 

 

Source

http://media.gmc.com/media/us/en/gmc/vehicles/sierra/2015.html

Quote

A high-capacity 9.76-inch axle is matched with 6.2L-equipped models and is part of the available Max Trailering Package.

 

 

Source

http://www.fourwheeler.com/vehicle-reviews/129-1304-the-general-has-spoken-gms-latest-trucks/

Quote

Trucks equipped with the 6.2L V-8 are fitted with a new 9.76-inch rear axle.

 

Not trying to say your wrong just wanted some hard facts because I didn't think that my 3.42 ratio had the 9.76" but everything I have been reading tells me different

Edited by Antoine08
Posted

I wonder if there is an RPO code to check in the glove box that would tell either way. I fear it will just tell you NHT or not, which doesn't solve the discrepancy we are having.

Posted

I bet axle ratings are the same. Wish nht gave us higher rawr and at least 7600 gvwr, in addition to the cooling upgrades.

Posted

I would call the dealership but we all know I could get the most off the wall answer. So I'm hoping to get someone who actually knows, because I would like to move up to 3.73 or 4.10 gears and that obviously plays a big part.

 

Does anyone have the part number and price for GM 3.73 ring and pinion gear.

Posted

On GMDirect website right now there differently is a 3.42 with 9.76" axle assembly. I'm starting to think the 6.2L do have the 9.76"

Posted

One thing that struck me odd is if you look at chevy.com or gmc.com and compare the same cab configuration 5.3 to 6.2 the weight is different. I'm not sure if this is due to more std equipment or that may indicated the 6.2 comes with the bigger 9.76 axle. Engine vs engine there shouldn't be any difference in weight as they are both all aluminum and physically the same size.

Posted

Hey guys i answered my own question. To all you 6.2L owners it is said by GMDirect that we have the larger 9.75" Axle. so if you have the 3.42 gears, the GM 3.73 can be a direct replacement. Part numbers are in the picture.

 

Looks like i will be upgrading to 3.73 gears soon, i know many of you think thats not a big enough swap but to me thats all i want.

 

Screen Shot 2014 11 11 At 7.30.14 AM

  • Like 2
Posted

Thanks - curious why you would want to spend $2k on going from 3:42 to 3:73? Lift/tired? Towing? I'm very happy with my 3:42's...

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

It will cost less than 1k. I love my 6.2L but i can't leave things alone i put a 2" leveling kit and 33" tires didn't really affect performance to much, but would like to get a little extra power. I will do the maintenance myself with a few buddies so only paying for parts and beer.

Edited by Antoine08

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,993
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    President Roberto
    Newest Member
    President Roberto
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 270 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I don't wanna do major surgery/upgrades, behind-the-dash work, add amps, change radio etc. on my '26 std cab WT. On the WT, it has the base 7" IOR infotainment setup, and only two speakers (doors). Since I listen to classical, looked around for speakers that do well and dug thru reviews. Two-way speakers were found to be better than 3-way. So I've ordered a pair of  Infinity Reference REF-9632IX 2 way speakers.  [These may  or may not have been discontinued / succeeded by the 3-way ...9633 ones.]    These speakers are lauded for 3 ohm and 94db sensitivity spec so they'll work well for ordinary base car radios without amps and offer better performance (quality,  strength) than  default base paper-cone speakers. They'll be installed in a few days and I'll let y'all know what I think. Bill W San Jose      
    • Thanks!   Changed out the rear shocks today to Bilstein 5100s.  So far feel much better. The stock Rancho were wore out.  Lots of heavy hauling (2 moves, home renovations, etc).  Next up is new BFG tires Monday.  Cant wait the current tires have little to no wet traction and are super loud (hum)    
    • Ok, I got the all the codes. What do you all think would be a place to start?
    • How about I just point to the factory pans stand pipe little drain plug and claim its a pan with a real drain plug !. I just couldn't swallow the fact that a Dorman pan which at this point is probably the only pan out there that fits the gas version truck cost that much up here in Canada so I decided initially anyway to skip it and see what I thought of pulling the pan method and down the road if I felt inclined enough then I would either install a drain plug kit in the factory pan if there is enough room for it, or have a bung welded onto it, or put an aftermarket pan on. The thing is if the pan is not pulled then the magnets in the pan can't be inspected and cleaned or if wanting to change out the filter. However of course it certainly would make the job easier to be able to drop the oil first before having to handle the pan if dropping the pan that go around was the goal.    I knew a guy locally that was doing custom field spraying years ago with a pickup pulling a ground driven sprayer, I believe it was a GM pickup with an automatic trans. He had a drain plug in his pan and would drop the oil out of it once a week and top it back up through the dipstick tube to keep refreshing a portion of the oil often and that made the transmission last far longer than had he done nothing. Soft fields pulling 500 gallons of water at the start of each mixed up sprayer tank batch and in low range sucking along. I imagine he got some tips from other custom sprayer outfits doing the same thing at the time and learning from their blown up tranny mistakes. Transmissions then had no lock up converter so would cook the crap out of the fluid slipping that much and it would not have been synthetic fluid either. 
    • 3.39 Kroger’s in Montgomery Texas. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...