Jump to content

Need a bottom line here


Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been debating on getting 285/75/16 MTR's vs. the 305/70/16 for a while.  Started thinking that I didn't want to lift my ride and just wanted to add a lil traction for hunting/fishing (where I go is kinda hard to get to but doesn't require 6"s of lift and I'm not big into mudding as there aren't that many places to go in New Orleans since they closed the spillway down)  

Then I went to Goodyear today to get some prices and the guy asked why I did't want to go with the 305 "stating that its just as tall as the 285, but its a lil over an 1" wider".  (after he pulled the demisions it is a lil over an inch wider and about the same height).

 

My question(s) is, how much will the 305/70 affect my performance. (I want to tone it down a lil anyway so I don't spin the tires all the time when I pull out in front of someone)  And do I have the 373's?  I've got the tow package so I would assume I do, right?  And how's the treadwear on the MTR's?  Also, is 941.00 including everything and an alignment high or low or normal?  Oh yeah, do you guys have any pics of a stock truck with a 305 tire on it?

 

once again, thanks for the time and help

Posted

Well,you're most likely going to wear the 305's out quicker because they are acutally wider than what is recommended for the stock rim.They will most likely "crown" in the middle because of the width lacking and wear quicker there than the edges unless you go with a wider wheel.

 

IMO,you'd be just a good with the 285's because a narrower tire is generally better in deep mud due to less turning resistance.It won't take quite as much power to move them and it will not put quite as much strain on driveline components such as bearings and cv joints.

Posted
great, thanks for the time and help yZR2k!  NOW, as far as the 285/75 go are they going to make my truck look like a truck?  Cause the 265 look like doughnuts...IMO?!  Any pics of a 285 mudder on a stock chevy?
Posted
Let me see if I can create another picturetrail account.  They just took mine offline.  I have some 285 BFG AT's on my truck.  It looks like a truck I think.
Posted

I have 285 BFG's on my 2500 HD . They look great mounted on the stock rims. I see you are running the 3.73 gears. You will notice loss of low end torque. I did to but I have the 4.10 gears so it isnt that much of a low end loss. I agree with YZR2K ,  you are going to wear the centers out quicker with wider tires mounted on the stock rims.  

20151781.jpg

 

As  far as the cost you quoted it sounds high to me. My BFG's were $830 out the door including road hazard,balance and tax.

Posted

Great, thanks for the pic.  I've been pricing and I'm probably going to get them on the net.  

thanks for the time...

Posted

click on the picture in my sig to see a bunch of pics of my 285s.

 

Also $900 seems high.  I got 5 bfg ats for like $800

Posted

Still no dice on viewing your other pics, but you gave me a good idea with the pic you posted.

 

thanks, again, for the time

Posted
I have 285 BFG's on my 2500 HD . They look great mounted on the stock rims. I see you are running the 3.73 gears. You will notice loss of low end torque. I did to but I have the 4.10 gears so it isnt that much of a low end loss. I agree with YZR2K ,  you are going to wear the centers out quicker with wider tires mounted on the stock rims.  

20151781.jpg

 

As  far as the cost you quoted it sounds high to me. My BFG's were $830 out the door including road hazard,balance and tax.

how did you get a different ratio?  someone at a dealer told me that changing from 373 to 410 would void my warranty...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 571 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks; I looked there a few minutes, and I think I can find something. I really never looked there, as I thought it was stuff like PTO/aftermarket bodies/accessories like snow plows.
    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...