Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok...I can't take complete credit for this fix as this has been done by a couple of members here, but I can take full credit for the way I did it.

 

For those who have considered lifting or leveling your 2015 Sierra Denali and have had worries about the magnetic ride control affecting the ride, the solution is within.

 

There is 2 ways to do this. 1 way is to fabricate a bracket with some flat stock, drill 2 holes, connect the bottom hole in the fabricated bracket to the original bracket that is attached to the upper control arm, and then connect the upper hole in the fabricated bracket to the MRC rod. If you search, you can find these photos or maybe someone who has done it like this will chime in and provide pics.

 

Now, if you want an easier way or just don't have the tools to cut, drill, etc. and fabricate a bracket, a longer metric bolt and a handful of washers net the same result. I have the tools and material to fabricate said bracket, but I wanted go this route as it was trial and error for me. This is due to not knowing the starting position before installing the kit. Sadly, I didn't even know the truck had MRC before installing the kit. It wasn't till I experienced the extremely poor ride after the install that I figured out that it had it.

 

Anyhow, I would highly suggest you figuring out a way to measure and pinpoint a "home" position for the MRC rod and then after the kit, you can determine how much you need to move the MRC rod to put it back where it started. If you're like me and you never started out with a home position, you can just add washers until you get the desired ride you want. For me, it was a total of 18 washers that equated to 1" in length. I taped them for the ease of installation.

 

As you can see from the pic, instead of raising the MRC rod by fabricating a bracket, I raised it with washers on the bracket that is affixed to the upper control arm. Hope this helps!

 

MRC%20Solution_zpsmvwbgcul.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

Lol! This is "adjustable". U can add or subtract washers as needed. It's getting the job done and a 2" long piece of flat stock with 2 holes in it is no high tech alternative. It's not that serious. Lol

  • Like 4
Posted

Seems like an innovative way to find correct amount of distance, to fabricate a block of the correct dimensions at a later date. I like it. I think I would use some SS tubing and a longer bolt after finding exact length.

 

Which level spacer did you use? On top of, or on the bottom of the shock?

 

I've been looking into a level, or possibly a lift, but not real happy with any of the options. None of the level kits come with A arms, and all the lifts require heavy cutting and molestation of cross members and drive train components. There's no way in hell I'm about to 'whittle' on my new luxury truck.

Posted

The bolt I used was over double the length of the stock one. I could substitute tubing or fabricate a spacer equal in length, but I'm in no hurry. There's nothing wrong with the washers I have.

 

The RC 2.5" utilizes a spacer above and below the strut. I didn't measure the thickness.

 

I don't believe any level kits come with a-arms and usually only utilize spacers.

  • Like 2
Posted

None yet..... Cognito told me they have one in the works....Kinda like the check's in the mail at this point. I may just try the kit that adds a shim under the shock for the time being.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Ok...I can't take complete credit for this fix as this has been done by a couple of members here, but I can take full credit for the way I did it.

 

For those who have considered lifting or leveling your 2015 Sierra Denali and have had worries about the magnetic ride control affecting the ride, the solution is within.

 

There is 2 ways to do this. 1 way is to fabricate a bracket with some flat stock, drill 2 holes, connect the bottom hole in the fabricated bracket to the original bracket that is attached to the upper control arm, and then connect the upper hole in the fabricated bracket to the MRC rod. If you search, you can find these photos or maybe someone who has done it like this will chime in and provide pics.

 

Now, if you want an easier way or just don't have the tools to cut, drill, etc. and fabricate a bracket, a longer metric bolt and a handful of washers net the same result. I have the tools and material to fabricate said bracket, but I wanted go this route as it was trial and error for me. This is due to not knowing the starting position before installing the kit. Sadly, I didn't even know the truck had MRC before installing the kit. It wasn't till I experienced the extremely poor ride after the install that I figured out that it had it.

 

Anyhow, I would highly suggest you figuring out a way to measure and pinpoint a "home" position for the MRC rod and then after the kit, you can determine how much you need to move the MRC rod to put it back where it started. If you're like me and you never started out with a home position, you can just add washers until you get the desired ride you want. For me, it was a total of 18 washers that equated to 1" in length. I taped them for the ease of installation.

 

As you can see from the pic, instead of raising the MRC rod by fabricating a bracket, I raised it with washers on the bracket that is affixed to the upper control arm. Hope this helps!

 

MRC%20Solution_zpsmvwbgcul.jpg

Is the arm connected to the sensor pretty much straight across now 90*? I did the same exact this as you as I did not know of the magnetic ride.

Posted

Ok so I haven't tried this yet but I'm pretty sure this will work. I found this company that makes the rods for the magnetic ride sensor to be adjustable in length. Company is called adjustableairride.com if anyone wants to try them out go for it. I've contacted the company they said they can make the rods just need a few measurements. I plan to use them for my 15 Denali when I begin my lowering process.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Ok so I haven't tried this yet but I'm pretty sure this will work. I found this company that makes the rods for the magnetic ride sensor to be adjustable in length. Company is called adjustableairride.com if anyone wants to try them out go for it. I've contacted the company they said they can make the rods just need a few measurements. I plan to use them for my 15 Denali when I begin my lowering process.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Any updates on this?

Posted

Any updates on this?

I don't have any updates but I was contacted by the owner of the company and someone else has contacted him and they have made a set of rods for a lifted truck. I have no doubts this will work just contact them.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I had a Pro Comp Level Kit part # 23235 installed by my dealer on my 2015 Sierra Denali and the result was a very poor ride, so I took it back and found that the tech had not zeroed the sensors, once he did that it was perfect.

Posted

I ordered the Suspensionmaxx kit the other day. Hopefully have it installed in next few weeks.

  • 4 years later...
Posted
On 5/8/2015 at 12:04 PM, BlackOps said:

Ok...I can't take complete credit for this fix as this has been done by a couple of members here, but I can take full credit for the way I did it.

 

For those who have considered lifting or leveling your 2015 Sierra Denali and have had worries about the magnetic ride control affecting the ride, the solution is within.

 

There is 2 ways to do this. 1 way is to fabricate a bracket with some flat stock, drill 2 holes, connect the bottom hole in the fabricated bracket to the original bracket that is attached to the upper control arm, and then connect the upper hole in the fabricated bracket to the MRC rod. If you search, you can find these photos or maybe someone who has done it like this will chime in and provide pics.

 

Now, if you want an easier way or just don't have the tools to cut, drill, etc. and fabricate a bracket, a longer metric bolt and a handful of washers net the same result. I have the tools and material to fabricate said bracket, but I wanted go this route as it was trial and error for me. This is due to not knowing the starting position before installing the kit. Sadly, I didn't even know the truck had MRC before installing the kit. It wasn't till I experienced the extremely poor ride after the install that I figured out that it had it.

 

Anyhow, I would highly suggest you figuring out a way to measure and pinpoint a "home" position for the MRC rod and then after the kit, you can determine how much you need to move the MRC rod to put it back where it started. If you're like me and you never started out with a home position, you can just add washers until you get the desired ride you want. For me, it was a total of 18 washers that equated to 1" in length. I taped them for the ease of installation.

 

As you can see from the pic, instead of raising the MRC rod by fabricating a bracket, I raised it with washers on the bracket that is affixed to the upper control arm. Hope this helps!

 

MRC%20Solution_zpsmvwbgcul.jpg

Did you have to do this to the rear sensor also?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...