Jump to content

Turning in my Ford


Recommended Posts

Posted

Well guys, picked up the truck tonight. I'm very happy with my purchase :)

 

Question, I have a set of blizzaks from my f150, 275 vs the 265 on the Chevy...what are my options? Sell them?

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Well guys, picked up the truck tonight. I'm very happy with my purchase :)

 

Question, I have a set of blizzaks from my f150, 275 vs the 265 on the Chevy...what are my options? Sell them?

If the rim size is the same they well go on the chevy rims. Drive for a little before you sell them you may not like the stock tires. Or flip on the blizzaks and wear them out first. Then put the stockers back on that way you will have the stock tires with good tread depth when you turn it in.

Posted

Well guys, picked up the truck tonight. I'm very happy with my purchase :)

Question, I have a set of blizzaks from my f150, 275 vs the 265 on the Chevy...what are my options? Sell them?

Welcome to the club!

Posted

I'm leasing my truck too, and opted for the v6. Cheaper payment, cheaper to ensure, (marginally) better gas mileage, and if I do decide to keep it at lease end, my purchase price is killer.

 

It has plenty of get-up-and go in the power department, and actually tows more than the standard v8 configuration (3.08 gears). When a few people asked if I got the 8 after taking them on a ride they tried calling BS that it was a 6.

 

I don't do any towing with it, but if I did I'd be towing 3500lbs max, and I have done a few heavy hauls (1000lbs) and she runs like a champ.

 

5.3's are certainly more popular, but you know, everyone has to wave their man-card!

 

 

 

The 4.3 is rated at 7200lbs towing when you get the 3.42 and towing package. I leased mine as ive seen what other trucks look like here in the north after 4-5 years. I'm getting to the point where i don't want to work on my vehicles or pay to have it done. The truck pulls my 5800 TT just fine (I would not go thru the Rockies with it) but in the flat lands of the Midwest it has done just fine. It has just as much HP as the old 4.8 motor and real close to the early 5.3 numbers. I only tow once a month maybe twice from may to Sept. So for me I get the benefits of better mileage the rest of the year.

 

You two are way too sensible to be posting. I bought a 5.3, but it is hard to argue with the logic of the 4.3 in many situations, especially when the numbers are compared to trucks of just a few years ago. For many on this forum, it seems the more we have, the more we think we need.

Posted

Well guys, picked up the truck tonight. I'm very happy with my purchase :)

 

Question, I have a set of blizzaks from my f150, 275 vs the 265 on the Chevy...what are my options? Sell them?

The 275 will be a touch taller. Not by much. You will be fine.
Posted

275 is the width, not height. Look at the full measurements of the tires and you more than likely won't have any issues. Ex-275/55/20 55 is the sidewall height, 275 is how many MM wide, and 20 is the wheel size.

Posted

275 is the width, not height. Look at the full measurements of the tires and you more than likely won't have any issues. Ex-275/55/20 55 is the sidewall height, 275 is how many MM wide, and 20 is the wheel size.

I am aware. But both tires have the same size rim at 18. Same aspect ratio at 65%. 65% of 275 is 178.75 mm. 65% of a 265 is 172.25. Those are your sidewall heights. Therefore... the 275/65 is a touch taller than the 265/65. To be exact. The 275/65r18 is 13mm or .512 inch taller than the 265/65r18

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question for you Grumpy, why is diesel so much more than gasoline? Seems to me that it may be slightly a little less refined than gas and it doesn't have 10% alcohol which presumably lowers the price of gas
    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way too big headlights (similar to a previous non-Wrangler SUV) should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crossing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...