Jump to content

Odd rear tire wear


Recommended Posts

Posted

DSCF0040.JPG

 

DSCF0038.JPG

 

This is on both sides, the right rear seems to be worse, but it is on both sides.  I am getting new wheels/tires this weekend, and don;t want brand new tires to wear like this too.

  Any other problems thoughts besided a wheel alignment?  Thats all I have in mind.....help

 Mike

Posted
There's not much to adjust on the rear of the truck, it almost looks like the choppiness was caused on the fronts, they usually wear like that when not rotated.  I can't tell ya what would cause it on teh rear, except maybe that it is not properly balanced or maybe the tire just does not wear well when down around, it looks like 2-4/32" of tread...???
Posted

These could have been up front, and rotated to back, im not sure...just bought it.  none the less prob not a bad idea for me to get an alignment before I put new rubber on!

 mike

 

Thanks!

Posted
I agree that those tires may have been on the front and rotated to the back. Shocks look oem and thay may have contributed to the problem.
Posted

The tires on my '01 Tahoe that I just purchased about 2 months ago look identical to yours.  I don't know the history of the tires since I bought it used.  The front end was pretty out of alignment when I bought it (dealer aligned it as part of the deal) so I was wondering if the tires were originally up front and had just been rotated to the rear.  But it is all a guess.

 

I too am looking to replace the tires but I want some bigger tires to go on the 17" Z71 rims after I put on a 3" body lift.  $$$$

 

B.J.

Posted
lack of rotation...I guy I work with hasnt rotated the tires on his F150 since new and has the same wear
Posted
worn shocks and underinflation could also be the culprit.

Any good way to tell if shocks are bad?

 I assume they are OEM, and have been on there for 52k.  They still ride nice...  to me anyway.

 

Any suggestions for new ones?

 

MIke

Posted
worn shocks and underinflation could also be the culprit.

Any good way to tell if shocks are bad?

 I assume they are OEM, and have been on there for 52k.  They still ride nice...  to me anyway.

 

Any suggestions for new ones?

 

MIke

52K miles on OEM? Definately gone. OEM shocks are usually good for 15K - 20K miles. Can't go wrong with Bilsteins. I got mine from www.offroadwarehouse.com. Had them about a year (about 10K miles) and no complaints yet.  :thumb:

Posted
worn shocks and underinflation could also be the culprit.

Any good way to tell if shocks are bad?

 I assume they are OEM, and have been on there for 52k.  They still ride nice...  to me anyway.

 

Any suggestions for new ones?

 

MIke

52K miles on OEM? Definately gone. OEM shocks are usually good for 15K - 20K miles. Can't go wrong with Bilsteins. I got mine from www.offroadwarehouse.com. Had them about a year (about 10K miles) and no complaints yet.  :thumb:

Suggest doing all 4 together I assume?

   only that many miles on OEM huh?  Wow...  sucks!!

 

Mike

Posted
I have never seen "replace shocks" in a Chevy suggested maintence manual...or in any vehicle's maintence manual for that matter.  Does anybody else think that shocks should only last for 15 - 20k miles?
Posted

A "cupped" wear pattern on the tires can be caused by a wheel and tire that are out of balance or by weak shock absorbers or struts. This type of wear occurs because the wheel bounces up and down as it rolls down the highway. The cure here is to have the wheel balanced or replace the worn shocks or struts.

 

The wear looks like "cupping" to me.

 

Brent

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Diesel or gas?  The 37s will obviously, drastically reduce mpg, but the gasser will take a bigger hit to mpg, and power.    I wouldn't sweat a gear change on a duramax at all, and unlikely on the gasser either. You're obviously not concerned with acceleration or towing, and the 10spd will find itself in the right gear without much hunting, if any. 
    • I understand. It is disturbing to think a manufacture asks so much and gives so little in engineering support. This is not a GM issues, this is a greed issue and one the ALL practice.    My intent was not to remove the wind from anyone's sail but rather to point out the areas deficient so that they can be discussed with improvements the goal. But to do that you have to know the truth and what that truth is.    The commercial interest are honed in on a few select issues in which they control all the variables and are not forthcoming in the least with their customers about the details. Failure is the only thing that drives these people to improvement. One way not to fail it to manage public "expectations". The set a bar they can clear and put their thumbs under the suspenders with chest puffed.... Only the internal data tells the story fully. As we don't have access to that for decades then we have to generate it ourselves. UOA's with data that matters.  
    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...