Jump to content

GM increasing 6.2L engine production

2018GMC

By 2018GMC
in Future GM News & Rumors

Recommended Posts

SnakeEyeSS Senior Enthusiast

SnakeEyeSS

Posted
Posted

It would be nice if GM would offer the 6.2L engine in the new trucks with the LT trim level like they have in the past.

We should not be forced to pay insane money for the highest trim level to get the 6.2L engine.

I think it would sell great if GM would offer it in the LT models like they have in past model years. If would be difficult for dealerships to keep LT's with the 6.2L engine on the lot, it's the most popular trim level.

Why stop there? Throw it in a short wide for the "454SS" we have always wanted from the factory

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Cowpie Senior Enthusiast

Cowpie

Posted
Posted

It would be nice if GM would offer the 6.2L engine in the new trucks with the LT trim level like they have in the past.

We should not be forced to pay insane money for the highest trim level to get the 6.2L engine.

I think it would sell great if GM would offer it in the LT models like they have in past model years. If would be difficult for dealerships to keep LT's with the 6.2L engine on the lot, it's the most popular trim level.

 

 

Depended also on fuel requirements. Many folks are not going to buy something they have to feed premium fuel like the current 6.2L Ecotec. I know I won't, irregardless of trim level. If GM would do a good performing 6.2 in a flex fuel version, your contention probably would be true.

  • 5 months later...
firecat_30 Enthusiast

firecat_30

Posted
Posted

I wish they offered max tow package on he 1500 Denali, as far as I know 3.23 is only option. It still pulls the trailer and skidsteer fine but would be nice to have the better gearing.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 298 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Coastie05
      Casey from the Texas Hill Country

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      Enjoy the new truck, it’s a beauty. I’m glad you’re keeping the OBS, I love those old trucks. 
    • chris21
      Towing In Loose Gravel

      By chris21 · Posted

      With large equipment or deep mud it is more of a use the higher gear to avoid spinning tires, getting stuck because of spinning tires and doing damage to your machine. The idea is if you run out of torque before you spin tires you can still downshift for more torque. If you are just spinning your tires in the lowest available gear you are stuck and things break.   Automatic transmissions, traction control and electronic transfer cases change the calculation a little as you the driver have less control over each piece. 
    • davester
      My First Project and GMC has me stumped

      By davester · Posted

      are there any codes? with lots of rust, perhaps disconnect/clean both sides of the connection/examine cable ends (the wires) for corrosion going into the sheath & replace if necessary/reconnect ALL the power AND ground cables between the battery, engine, frame, cab, fuse box and starter charm.li (website) has a no-start diagnostic procedure you can work through to get it working.
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...