Jump to content

Paint protection and tint


Recommended Posts

Posted

I just tinted my 16 yesterday. 5% brow, 5% front windows and 15% back five windows. Looks great, can't see in during the day but can see out much better than 5% all around at night

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

You guys with the 5% are crazy! I had 20 around on my Jeep and 28 on the front and I had a hard enough time seeing. Going to do the brow for now and leave the front untouched since it's illegal

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

Posted

yeah I meant 5% drivers and passenger doors and brow, I would never tint the actual front windshield.....too many liabilities.

Posted

I meant the driver and passenger window too. Where I am from that get you pulled over in a heartbeat. But places can be different I realize.

 

How does the 16 ride in comparison to your 14. Pretty much the same?

Posted

Personally I am against paint protection. Personal choice but I prefer carnuba wax. I have also seen some terrible paint protection jobs start to 'yellow' and look real bad. Also GM does not do a 3500 grit wet sand and polish / buff every vehicle rolling out of the factory and every factory car/truck has some orange peel in the paint if you look closely. I spent 2 days wet sanding the entire thing and then polishing and buffing and just my opinion but it is 10x better than factory paint now. I could not have done that if I had the paint protection applied. You will never see a silver metallic paint job on a lot that looks like my avatar and I think the results speak for themselves.

 

This is an untouched hi res image from a $2500 canon camera my neighbor took.

 

 

As far as tint goes you should check local laws, some have restrictions. I do not know what you mean by 'brow tint' is that a slang? I did once have 5% tint on my 06 charger and had real issues seeing out and backing up at night. I would not recommend 5% for anything except like a show car as it really is not very functional and just for the looks.

 

my 2c anyway but do whatever makes you happiest as always.

 

 

Usually a customer has their car detailed right before the clear bra is installed. Some people won't care about the orange peel and just want the protection, others have the paint corrected first. Just personal preference.

 

If you want that perfect look, do it first and then do the clear bra. You'll have no issues.

Posted

Fair point but I also bet most detailers would not do the entire vehicle. It was no small task let me tell you and this is not first vehicle I have sanded (and painted) either. By no means am I a pro painter and also lack any artistic talent my only benefit is my best bud since forever has a family paint-shop. So for me it is just easy and I was taught to spray in a straight line. I also had to get rid of orange peel before I was teased to death about it lol. Does look way better though and I would recommend doing it professionally for anyone that wants a true showroom shine.

Posted

I meant the driver and passenger window too. Where I am from that get you pulled over in a heartbeat. But places can be different I realize.

 

How does the 16 ride in comparison to your 14. Pretty much the same?

My 16 is a lot quieter and a lot smoother than my 13. Not super smooth but both had 20" wheels, this drives much better. Worth the upgrade.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

Posted

My 16 rides alot better than my 14 All Terrain but then again that truck was a total POS nightmare. Electrical issues that no one could fix. I bought a 16 that had a tiny amount of transport damage that the dealer fixed before I took possession, in the five days it was being repaired I drove a loaner. When I went to pick up the new truck I asked the salesman what they were going to ask for my truck and he stated, "ooohhh man we've been having all kinds of problems with that!" I said, "it's almost like it spent 21 days in your shop and ya'll didn't fix anything" Here are pics of my tint from this morning...

post-156795-0-86566200-1469020510_thumb.jpgpost-156795-0-51925500-1469020522_thumb.jpg

post-156795-0-86566200-1469020510_thumb.jpg

post-156795-0-51925500-1469020522_thumb.jpg

post-156795-0-86566200-1469020510_thumb.jpg

post-156795-0-51925500-1469020522_thumb.jpg

post-156795-0-86566200-1469020510_thumb.jpg

post-156795-0-51925500-1469020522_thumb.jpg

Posted

So I had a 2014 Sierra brownstone with the hood protection, looked great, worked great. Traded to a Emerald green 2015. Now if there is dust in the air or just the minerals in rain water, it sticks to the 3M and looks terrible as it is all you see compared to the truck paint that does not hold the dust/minerals. But yes it stops rock chips ha

Posted

So I had a 2014 Sierra brownstone with the hood protection, looked great, worked great. Traded to a Emerald green 2015. Now if there is dust in the air or just the minerals in rain water, it sticks to the 3M and looks terrible as it is all you see compared to the truck paint that does not hold the dust/minerals. But yes it stops rock chips ha

 

My friend is an installer of protective films for many years. Been to Sema to meet with the companies regarding also. He started w/ 3M many years ago and it was one of the worst for many reasons. 3M lost a lot of market and had to improve to catch up to competition. This last year he switched to 3M after being won over by 3M and all the supposed improvements. Within 3 months he switched out of them as they are still one of the worst. I have suntek and lots of rain here in Florida. I have no issues and it has a factory shine. I do keep it waxed as that is important for the dust and rain to run off nicely. I don't get any spots. But if it's pretty dirty and get a light shower I get spots. Would have with paint too.

Posted

I did PPF on my 09. Didn't get it done on my 14 because to much damage already (4000 miles). Installer said it would look terrible if he did it. I touch up the paint all the time. Next truck....no question. It will be done.

 

 

Cheers

 

The Whaler

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I'm taking it in to get SunTek tomorrow. They're doing the bumper, grill, mirrors, front fenders, and the first 18" of the bumper. At some point I might add the pillars and the roof

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

Posted

Do the hood, bumper, 1/4 front of fenders, and mirrors. I haven't had an issue (yet) with the pillars or roof, on the 3 trucks of this new model.

Posted

I got a DIY roll from Amazon, we shall see, Planning on doing the first 12" on the hood, rocker panels, door edging, door sills. We will see how it goes on before committing to anything more.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 681 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...