Jump to content

2016 Chevy Silverado no start problems

Eric_lajeunesse
 Share

Recommended Posts

Simona1 New Member

Simona1

Posted
Posted

Weird my 2015 is doing the same thing except it's making a sound like the battery is dead. I jiggle the negative battery cable then it starts sometimes. Scared to turn the thing off when I go out. Has anyone gotten theirs fixed with a positive on what's causing this problem?

  • 8 months later...
pmzook New Member

pmzook

Posted
Posted

I'm also curious if this was ever resolved. This has been happening to my 2016 Silverado the past 2 years I've had it. Just when it's cold at night and warming up in the morning causing condensation. After it sits out for a while/heats up it starts fine. I'm not a mechanic or anything but I am pretty handy for the most part. I've tested the battery and the load is fine still, so the battery shouldn't be an issue. I even tried jumping it when it would start and it wouldn't jump. My internet research is suggesting it might be a bad starter? I would like to know if this is really it before taking it in to get replaced.

pmzook New Member

pmzook

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, pmzook said:

I'm also curious if this was ever resolved. This has been happening to my 2016 Silverado the past 2 years I've had it. Just when it's cold at night and warming up in the morning causing condensation. After it sits out for a while/heats up it starts fine. I'm not a mechanic or anything but I am pretty handy for the most part. I've tested the battery and the load is fine still, so the battery shouldn't be an issue. I even tried jumping it when it wouldn't start and it wouldn't jump. My internet research is suggesting it might be a bad starter? I would like to know if this is really it before taking it in to get replaced.

 

  • 2 years later...
JerryH New Member

JerryH

Posted
Posted

Very same issue with a Chevy 2500 HD 2016 (variety of blinking console warnings, starter won't activate on moist cool mornings), and here's the solution!!!  THERE'S A GROUNDING STRAP FROM THE COMPUTER MODULES DOWN TO THE FRONT WHEEL-WELL LOCATIONS ON THE FRAME, BOTH DRIVER AND PASSENGER SIDE.  WITH AGE AND CORROSION, THESE GROUNDING CONNECTIONS BECOME INTERMITTENT WITH MOISTURE.  FIX IS QUICK:  (1) Find a 10 mm wrench or socket, remove the bonding bolt, (2) Use a piece of sandpaper or emery cloth to remove the corrosion on the strap eyelet and the frame, (3) re-apply the grounding bolt.  THE DRIVER SIDE STRAP APPEARS TO HAVE THE MOST SIGNIFICANT IMPACT, BUT CLEAN UP BOTH!

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • Grumpy Bear
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...