Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

1fbe26e3f2990ac9dbde22e87c18e39e.jpg

 

That's about 24000 miles on my 6.2... The intake valves look just fine.

 

Sent from my PURE XL using Tapatalk

I don't know all of the parameters of your engine but there have been a bunch of other photos posted on this forum of dirty valves at very low mileage....even lower than yours.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Food for thought - The new 2017 Ecoboost has DI AND Port fuel injection to combat the carbon buildup issues.

Posted (edited)

I don't know all of the parameters of your engine but there have been a bunch of other photos posted on this forum of dirty valves at very low mileage....even lower than yours.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Good for them haha. Point is that at the mileage the op is being fleeced at for a service if it was my truck... Well it's a waste of money. I broke mine in hard and subsequently hand in hand with good ring seal I don't have an oil slobbering disaster. Does the op? Pull the manifold and take a peek or fish a camera down the throttle body. He could do the old sea foam method if he is concerned... Which is in a likelihood all the dealer would do anyway. We are on our third run of these direct injected things at work since debut and they get about 80000 to 90000 miles in a year on a fleet of about 20 trucks I get to interact with. Not one yet has had a cleaning of any form and all run OK... Plus idle for hours on end. Is some performance over day one lost... Probably... Is it enough to warrant walnut blasting every 25000 miles or even ever... Probably not.

 

Sent from my PURE XL using Tapatalk

Edited by 1994Vmax
  • Like 1
Posted

Good for them haha. Point is that at the mileage the op is being fleeced at for a service if it was my truck... Well it's a waste of money. I broke mine in hard and subsequently hand in hand with good ring seal I don't have an oil slobbering disaster. Does the op? Pull the manifold and take a peek. He could do the old sea foam method if he is concerned... Which is in a likelihood all the dealer would do anyway.

 

Sent from my PURE XL using Tapatalk

Something doesn't look right with your photo. There is all that black crud around your valve on the side walls of the intake port but the valve itself is white as snow. If you zoom in that white stuff looks like it's built up on your valves and has some thickness to it. Are you sure your valves are actually clean? I've never seen white valves like that before it almost looks like foam or emulsified oil.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

True you probably don't need walnut blasting every 25,000. BG products are advised to be used every 15k though to keep the valves clean and they cost less than a walnut cleaning. That seems to be a decent maintenance approach. It doesn't surprise me that these trucks don't have problems at 80 and 90k miles. It's been suspected that major issues will start showing up at high mileage. I want to see where these things are at 115k and 150k. It's the long term owner that suffers most not the short term owner.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
Posted (edited)

Something doesn't look right with your photo. There is all that black crud around your valve on the side walls of the intake port but the valve itself is white as snow. If you zoom in that white stuff looks like it's built up on your valves and has some thickness to it. Are you sure your valves are actually clean? I've never seen white valves like that before it almost looks like foam or emulsified oil.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's dirt lol... I didn't pull this intake to show you people my valves specifically.... No one here is that special haha... But the opportunity arose so why not when I'm there. I pulled it to wash it out from a significant intake leak that filled it with dust... Including of course the cylinder head ports. It's what happens when somehow the stock airbox dents in around the tube clamp.

 

None the less yes the valves were clean and the buildup was so minimal it's nonexistent. The discoloration of the valve is nothing more than that... Discoloration. It wasn't white either... That's the camera flash causing that color you see. It's nothing like some of the messes people post on here.

 

Sent from my PURE XL using Tapatalk

Edited by 1994Vmax
Posted (edited)

True you probably don't need walnut blasting every 25,000. BG products are advised to be used every 15k though to keep the valves clean and they cost less than a walnut cleaning. That seems to be a decent maintenance approach. It doesn't surprise me that these trucks don't have problems at 80 and 90k miles. It's been suspected that major issues will start showing up at high mileage. I want to see where these things are at 115k and 150k. It's the long term owner that suffers most not the short term owner.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

True but at that point a good chunk of the original buyers quit caring... Because it's traded hands 3 times, warranty is long gone and it's life. If you want a 100000 mile plus vehicle that's on you and buyer beware I guess. Some guys buy them and drive them for decades.. Yes I know as on one truck I am doing that ( not this 2015 though in my case) ... But just as many or more do not drive beyond the warranty period. It will be a roll of the dice... Just like buying an afm equipped one since 07 is and hoping the rings aren't coked in the afm cylinders. But really... An intake service at 115000 miles isn't anything insane in ownership either.

 

Sent from my PURE XL using Tapatalk

Edited by 1994Vmax
Posted

True but at that point a good chunk of the original buyers quit caring... Because it's traded hands 3 times, warranty is long gone and it's life. If you want a 100000 mile plus vehicle that's on you and buyer beware I guess. Some guys buy them and drive them for decades.. Yes I know as on one truck I am doing that ( not this 2015 though in my case) ... But just as many or more do not drive beyond the warranty period. It will be a roll of the dice... Just like buying an afm equipped one since 07 is and hoping the rings aren't coked in the afm cylinders. But really... An intake service at 115000 miles isn't anything insane in ownership either.

 

Sent from my PURE XL using Tapatalk

 

Yeah I think the new reality is that buying modern vehicles means the maintenance and reliability game is changing. 15 or 20 years ago no one was worried about cleaning their valves. Now it's just part of owning a vehicle with high mileage I guess.

  • 4 years later...
Posted
On 8/23/2016 at 12:49 PM, m3n00b said:

Would love to hear about this!

Any updates on your experiment?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,915
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    ChristopherDobson
    Newest Member
    ChristopherDobson
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,087 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monthly payment is only part of the equation. With today's prices and interest rates, I'd look at the total monthly cost: payment, insurance, registration, fuel, maintenance, and expected repairs. A vehicle that fits comfortably into your budget is usually the better choice than stretching for a higher trim. I've also kept my vehicles longer over the past few years. New cars have gotten expensive enough that driving one for 10+ years, while staying on top of maintenance, often ends up being the most cost-effective approach.
    • 10 Ford and Chevy engines proven to reach 300,000 miles   You may note a common 3K OCI on this list of gas motors. I skipped over the diesels. Dh'O. 
    • Thanks newdude!  By the time manual selection is needed, I'm probably too much of a control-freak to depend on the transmission sensing braking to activate automatic downshifting.  I would be anticipating the situation and already be manually downshifting.   This truck replaced a 2004.5 LLY diesel with the Allison 5-speed.  Putting it in T/H made noticeable differences (when the torque converter locked, upshift points, downshift behavior).  On this 2024 gasser with the 10L1000 I haven't been able to detect much, if any, difference.  Ok, I can never tell now when the torque converter locks up.  But I also don't notice differences in shifting.  For downhills, I've probably already manually downshifted by then anyway.  Since it's also more awkward (than the 2004.5) to engage/disengage I don't even bother.  Or maybe it doesn't really matter with just a 3k lb. camper in the bed?   Thanks also for the list of reasons the charging system might select various voltages.  However, what I am seeing doesn't fall into any of those categories.  It very definitely, and very consistently, rises after coasting/braking.  Maybe not immediately, but not very long after coasting/braking.  Very consistently drops voltage when no longer coasting/braking.  It might also be interacting with the camper battery charging (I might disconnect the camper and see if it changes the charging behavior).  I also need to recheck turning on headlights for when I want to force it to charge the camper.   Another JR, in June I converted the camper to LiFePO4.  Since it's not a good idea to try to charge lithiums directly using truck, I installed a Victron Orion XS DC-DC charger (which BTW is AMAZING!!).  Being cheap, I only had to buy that one item (besides the battery, of course) to do the conversion.  The camper OEM 120v battery charger (only 19 years old and works perfectly) and the truck feed the input to the DC-DC charger (not at the same time).  But I didn't want the camper charger feeding back to the truck so I kept the old separator.  I considered replacing the separator with a 30amp diode but that means more work and might add another 1/2 volt drop.  One thing that surprised me was the voltage drop over the long 10awg wire run, so I can only charge smoothly at 8 amps (because the DC-DC charger is completely configurable).  Another reason I don't want an added voltage drop with the diode.  I might also be a little lazy but all this work is being done under the sink with a small cabinet opening.    
    • apparently CA smog is (or at least was)  checking that the vehicle is using the oem and/or a ca smog approved tune, so I expect you'll fail inspection doing it.
    • yes, leaking exhaust will mess up o2 sensor readings, which in turn messes up fuel trims.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...