Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Sad thing for our Ford friends is they cannot use a chemical direct induced valve cleaner such as Seafoam, CRC or Gumout as the chemicals in these products may run the turbo system. Lots of discussions on f150forum.com about this.

 

hmmm.....Gm reconfigured the intake/outlet ports on their heads to minimize the problem recently......hmmm.....go check out the Ford Ecoboost boys forums all coked up at 50,000K.....hmmmm Ferd's new 3.5 EB has completely addressed this seemingly made up problem of GDI's coking the valves to Mt Rushmore granite hardness!All of which are facts and all of which can be found on the internet......interesting!

Edited by Silverado Steve
Posted

I'll let you all know down the road how mine does. No catch can,no valve cleaning going to change oil and drive it. Just like I have done with all my other trucks.

  • Like 1
Posted

Just under 2800 miles on my 2016 now in just over 5 weeks.................................I can count the miles on ONE HAND that my truck has been in V4 mode. I use M5 exclusively around suburbia empty and towing my work trailer, as my speeds rarely exceed 50mph. I use the "Range" AFM delete device for long highway travels in order to use the 6th gear!!!

 

The oil level on my dip stick hasn't changed at all since ownership. I added an Elite catch can though at less than 500 miles on the clock.

Posted

I'll let you all know down the road how mine does. No catch can,no valve cleaning going to change oil and drive it. Just like I have done with all my other trucks.

I'm running a similar experiment with a coworker. He and I have the exact same truck. He's maintaining his like you normally would...87 octane gas from wherever, regular oil changes, no valve cleaning, no catch can, etc. I'm running 89 shell gas exclusively, catch can, and BG induction services every 15k miles to maintain the valves. I have about 34k miles and he has about 50k. We're going to see how both trucks are doing around 100k to see if what I've been doing has been worth it or a total waste of money. I'll keep the forum updated as well.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 7
Posted

Well I've had my truck for a couple months, and I've put about 6000 miles on it. So I should find out how the valves do in short order lol.

Posted

I'm running a similar experiment with a coworker. He and I have the exact same truck. He's maintaining his like you normally would...87 octane gas from wherever, regular oil changes, no valve cleaning, no catch can, etc. I'm running 89 shell gas exclusively, catch can, and BG induction services every 15k miles to maintain the valves. I have about 34k miles and he has about 50k. We're going to see how both trucks are doing around 100k to see if what I've been doing has been worth it or a total waste of money. I'll keep the forum updated as well.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Would love to hear about this!

Posted

I will it may take some time seeing as I drive about 13,000 miles a year on average haha. But I will post a new thread about it regarding long term results.

Posted

It is weird with these engines. My wife has a 2011 Acadia with 60,000 miles on it no engine problems what so ever. My mom has a 2011 traverse with 40,000 miles on it. Had to have the valves cleaned, dealer said they were full of carbon on them. She also used gas where ever she could get it the cheapest. My wife has only ever used top tier fuel. So maybe it does work..who knows.

Posted

It is weird with these engines. My wife has a 2011 Acadia with 60,000 miles on it no engine problems what so ever. My mom has a 2011 traverse with 40,000 miles on it. Had to have the valves cleaned, dealer said they were full of carbon on them. She also used gas where ever she could get it the cheapest. My wife has only ever used top tier fuel. So maybe it does work..who knows.

neither of those have DI engines

  • Like 3
Posted

1fbe26e3f2990ac9dbde22e87c18e39e.jpg

 

That's about 24000 miles on my 6.2... The intake valves look just fine.

 

Sent from my PURE XL using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

neither of those have DI engines

I'm pretty sure on top of the plastic cover that's on top of engine says"VVT direct injection 3.6." Is this not the same type?
Posted (edited)

As an owner of one of the first DI's hitting the market in '07 (BMW 335i) I'll give you the readers digest version of all this hoopla. The gas you run never touches the valves so don't get to caught up on that front, worry about the octane and freshness for your use. Only walnut blasting is the remedy. How often.... that's a subjective item that depends on YOUR car and actual carbon build up. I went 65k on my 335i and never had issues. The BMW dealers have special blasting equipment and walnut media. (Google walnut blast 335i) For a 335i, it was approx a $900 job at the dealer, $500 at the indies. Intake manifold comes off, blast the valves and reassemble. The only OTC medicine is CRC's German mechanic in a can. $14 later, it seems to work, especially if you use it more frequently than trying to use it every 50k. I've used one can on my K2XX and am due for another now. The consensus on the E90 forum was IIRC 50k intervals for blasting cars with no symptoms. Again, camera your valves and make your own decision. The only preventative measures you can do is run a catch can. I opted for a ADD W1 can with some baffle material. the amount of oil it catches in one oil change is mind boggling. I've spent WAY too much of my life on this topic. I read stuff where Toyota was toying with putting in an injector behind the throttle body to combat this long-term issue in their engines (Guess Toyota wants to keep that brand reputation of long term longevity). This is an issue that will affect the people who keep their vehicles longer than the warranty. So at the end of the day, the fuel injection has come full circle. From a TBI, to SFI, to TPI, then the DI and now we're back to where we started in 1987. An injector in the throttle body. My '14 has almost 52k on it now (yes I drive a lot). No issues on this front. I'm also confidenced a lot of Hwy driving and a pair of heavy Red Wings help combat the issue. I recommenced the USA made Red Wings model 606, they really help prevent carbon build up... my truck is proof. In all seriousness, some people get way too worked up over this. I've seen this on two forums now since 2007. The sky still hasn't fallen, 335i's are still running around and so are DI cars from GM and other makers. Install a catch can, run the CRC stuff frequently and sport your 606 red wings on the skinny pedal. Move on in life.

 

This topic makes me always think of something an older guy I work with tells people. Sometimes technology is not always better. In the 1960's the US spent $12M to develop a pen that wrote in space. Guess what the Russians used? A F'n pencil.

Edited by FL335i
  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,914
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    AidenVorpagel
    Newest Member
    AidenVorpagel
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,286 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks newdude!  By the time manual selection is needed, I'm probably too much of a control-freak to depend on the transmission sensing braking to activate automatic downshifting.  I would be anticipating the situation and already be manually downshifting.   This truck replaced a 2004.5 LLY diesel with the Allison 5-speed.  Putting it in T/H made noticeable differences (when the torque converter locked, upshift points, downshift behavior).  On this 2024 gasser with the 10L1000 I haven't been able to detect much, if any, difference.  Ok, I can never tell now when the torque converter locks up.  But I also don't notice differences in shifting.  For downhills, I've probably already manually downshifted by then anyway.  Since it's also more awkward (than the 2004.5) to engage/disengage I don't even bother.  Or maybe it doesn't really matter with just a 3k lb. camper in the bed?   Thanks also for the list of reasons the charging system might select various voltages.  However, what I am seeing doesn't fall into any of those categories.  It very definitely, and very consistently, rises after coasting/braking.  Maybe not immediately, but not very long after coasting/braking.  Very consistently drops voltage when no longer coasting/braking.  It might also be interacting with the camper battery charging (I might disconnect the camper and see if it changes the charging behavior).  I also need to recheck turning on headlights for when I want to force it to charge the camper.   Another JR, in June I converted the camper to LiFePO4.  Since it's not a good idea to try to charge lithiums directly using truck, I installed a Victron Orion XS DC-DC charger (which BTW is AMAZING!!).  Being cheap, I only had to buy that one item (besides the battery, of course) to do the conversion.  The camper OEM 120v battery charger (only 19 years old and works perfectly) and the truck feed the input to the DC-DC charger (not at the same time).  But I didn't want the camper charger feeding back to the truck so I kept the old separator.  I considered replacing the separator with a 30amp diode but that means more work and might add another 1/2 volt drop.  One thing that surprised me was the voltage drop over the long 10awg wire run, so I can only charge smoothly at 8 amps (because the DC-DC charger is completely configurable).  Another reason I don't want an added voltage drop with the diode.  I might also be a little lazy but all this work is being done under the sink with a small cabinet opening.    
    • apparently CA smog is (or at least was)  checking that the vehicle is using the oem and/or a ca smog approved tune, so I expect you'll fail inspection doing it.
    • yes, leaking exhaust will mess up o2 sensor readings, which in turn messes up fuel trims.
    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...