Jump to content

2016 Silverado LTZ crew cab...horrible ride after 70mph


Recommended Posts

Posted

As the title states, I just purchased this truck and currently have about 400 miles on the clock. Love the truck but when I got on the highway today at approached 70mph the truck started to have a horrible ride. 60-65 the ride is decent. 70mph is just horrible. Can anyone confirm that this is not normal and that this truck should ride smooth no matter what speed. I also noticed the back tires are beginning to have a slight cupping on the outside edge. My guess is all this is not normal. Any input.

Posted

As the title states, I just purchased this truck and currently have about 400 miles on the clock. Love the truck but when I got on the highway today at approached 70mph the truck started to have a horrible ride. 60-65 the ride is decent. 70mph is just horrible. Can anyone confirm that this is not normal and that this truck should ride smooth no matter what speed. I also noticed the back tires are beginning to have a slight cupping on the outside edge. My guess is all this is not normal. Any input.

Not normal. I have no issues with my 16 CC LTZ and regularly travel over 75mph.

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/153186-Shake-or-Vibration-Issues

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/183075-Spring-Clamps-Reduce-Rear-Vibration

Posted

I just could not take the horrible ride once I hit 70 anymore, so I brought it in for service. Leo in mind the truck has 600 miles on it. The dealer has had the truck for 2 days and called me today to pick it up as they said it was fixed. Said issue was a bad tire and the other tires needed to be balanced. Picked up the truck, got on the highway and the vibration is still present. Dealer us me bring the truck back. They said that they feel the vibration and are need more time to figure out why the ride is so bad after 70mph.

 

In all seriousness, does anyone have a 2016 Silverado LTZ 4x2 with the 20" stock rims ride smooth over 70mph? has anyone been able to have the issue fixed by their dealer? Getting concerned.

Posted

I just could not take the horrible ride once I hit 70 anymore, so I brought it in for service. Leo in mind the truck has 600 miles on it. The dealer has had the truck for 2 days and called me today to pick it up as they said it was fixed. Said issue was a bad tire and the other tires needed to be balanced. Picked up the truck, got on the highway and the vibration is still present. Dealer us me bring the truck back. They said that they feel the vibration and are need more time to figure out why the ride is so bad after 70mph.

 

In all seriousness, does anyone have a 2016 Silverado LTZ 4x2 with the 20" stock rims ride smooth over 70mph? has anyone been able to have the issue fixed by their dealer? Getting concerned.

Not be be rude, but have you looked at the 600+ page thread on the vibration issue with these trucks?

Posted

Not to be rude, but yes I looked over the 600 page thread and read about a bunch of people having the same issue,not much about what the dealer did to fix the issue. So, that is why I posted the question, has anyone been able to have the issue fixed by their dealer? If you don't like the post, then just don't click on it.

Posted

Not to be rude, but yes I looked over the 600 page thread and read about a bunch of people having the same issue,not much about what the dealer did to fix the issue. So, that is why I posted the question, has anyone been able to have the issue fixed by their dealer? If you don't like the post, then just don't click on it.

Well you obviously didn't read the thread because there have been many members who's vehicles were indeed fixed. Some balancing worked, some new tires, some rear ends or pinions, driveshafts and so on. So the answer to your question lies within but no one here can tell you what's wrong with your truck. You have warranty, and it's Chevrolet's job to take care of you. Although you may be frustrated, it's not nice to start a new topic and then talk down to someone who is trying to lead you in the right direction...
Posted

Well you obviously didn't read the thread because there have been many members who's vehicles were indeed fixed. Some balancing worked, some new tires, some rear ends or pinions, driveshafts and so on. So the answer to your question lies within but no one here can tell you what's wrong with your truck. You have warranty, and it's Chevrolet's job to take care of you. Although you may be frustrated, it's not nice to start a new topic and then talk down to someone who is trying to lead you in the right direction...

What he said.

Posted

It's known as the Chevy Shake. My 2016 does it with no help from dealer. Apparently, it's what you buy into when getting a K2 GM truck. I know there are possible fixes with bigger ubolts on the springs, different tires and such but my 2008 Sierra was always smooth as butter at all speeds. One expects technology would get better with ride and performance but it seems that's not the case. Always been a GM guy but...come on, Really? 45 grand for a shaky ass truck right off the dealer lot?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...