Jump to content

I would like to know any significant MPG or Torque using PowerAid Thro


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 1988 tbi 5.7 L and I am thinking of putting on a PowerAid Throttle Body Spacers. What can I expect in terms of MPG increase or decrease if driven the same way on same road circuit ?????

 

Thanks in advance

LOVER OF CHEVY

Posted

My friend ran one on his 1995 1500 with a 5.7 TBI. Some throttle response sure, but no real change in MPGs. Being an 88, I'd take you have the TH400/3L80 transmission as the 4L80 didn't show until 1991. An overdrive unit would benefit on the mileage side, especially if you have some tall gears like 3.73, 4.10 or 4.56. The TH400/3L80 units don't have an overdrive gear like the 4L80 benefits from.

 

Gear Vendors is one that comes to mind: https://www.gearvendors.com/hrgm3s.html

 

Pretty penny however...and I'm not sure if they work with 4x4 trucks. They might be a 2 wheel drive only type of option.

Posted

15HDriver, YOU ARE WRONG IN YOU AUTOMATIC STATEMENT.

Can't believe the crap people are throwing out on the forums. His statement is WRONG.

You have a 700r4 auto with OD, if it's a 3/4 or 1 tone truck..
No ifs, ands or buts to it. That was the ONLY factory auto transmission options.
th-350's ended around '83 or 84.. 4L60E didnt start till '93. NV4500 wasnt used untill early 90's
DOn't always believe what you read .... nothing like free simple advice.
Posted

An easy / fairly cheap option for more HP and mpg is to get an under drive crankshaft pulley from summit. Amazing difference.

Posted

way back when there was tall one barrels and short...otherwise, the same carb.

The tall is for big engines or weight of vehicle being heavy

the 5.7 is big.

 

I'd go with it just for temperature of fuel change. (stamina)

Posted

Thanks for the helpful suggestions GUYS.

 

Chris, can you enlighten me more about the under drive crankshaft pulley from summitt??? I believe this should turn the engine faster , Higher RPM but I don't see how that would help fuel mileage???????

 

Barry, Do you know of any proven testing.... I feel this thinking has been around a bit. In fact I recall back in the mid 80s I installed a similar riser under the single barrel carb with expensive platinium screen that was suppose to atomize the fuel better thereby increasing MPG. NO IMPROVEMENT but waste of time and money for me.

 

IF anyone else has any experience or suggestions chime in.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...