Jump to content

after 9 failed emissions tests


RyanbabZ71

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well my dads 92 S-10 was at the chevy dealership twice.  Changed darn near everything.  Still it never passed.  Failed 9 times.  

 

Well he didnt want to get a waiver (only good for 2 yrs) he opted to change his plates from a 7000 rating to an 11000 rating.  Had to pay $50 more but he will never need emissions tests again since the 11K rating is for larger trucks

 

Kinda funny his S-10 has a higher rating than my full size

Posted

Sweet.  Is that like the truck plates they have here in Illinois?  I think they are like "B" truck or something.

 

Glad to hear your Dad found a way to keep his truck.

 

Joe

Posted

Can't be a "B" truck plate that's in that category as mine has "B" truck plates on it.  I'm pretty sure I need to still take it to visit the emissions facility.  :devil:

Posted

Yup.  I think in Illinois unless you have a dump bed on it, all pickups (even S-10's) fall into the "B" class.  Could be different in Wisconsin where you are at and in Indiana where Ryan is at.

Posted

Must suck to have to emission test your vehicles.  None of that needed out here in the sticks.

 

IL light trucks all carry the red B plates unless you get them licensed for a higher weight rating, in that case you get commercial plates in a green color with I forget the letter.  Most guys that haul large goosenecks regularly have these plates, we just kept the standard Bs on ours.

Posted

In Wisconsin it's pretty much as follows:

 

S-10 sized trucks: A class

1/2 ton pickups: B class

3/4 ton pickups: C Class

1 ton pickups: D Class

Big honking trucks: X class

 

You can opt for plates lower than stated if you don't use your big truck or van to that extent.  My dad's chevy 3500 van is D class and since he's a plumber he needs all of that weight class, there's well over a thousand pounds of tools and supplies in the back of that thing.  My S-10 was an A Class (still have the plates in my closet) and my 1/2 ton silverado is a B class.  Most of the El Camino's I've seen have been B class as well.

Posted

I think I lowered the plates on my HD to 1/2 ton plates.  That saves me about $75/yr extra in registration.  I have no reason to carry the heavier plates.  I have a cap on the truck so I can't carry 2 ton of gravel unless I want to shovel it in and then scoop it out while on my hands and knees.  

 

I am probably close to being overweight when towing due to the 900 lb toungue wt and the firewood in the bed, but the truck carries the load so well, no-one would ever know...

Posted
Must suck to have to emission test your vehicles.  None of that needed out here in the sticks.

Don't even get me started!   :angry:

 

But the good news is, that as of 3/1/2002 the IM240 roller test is no longer used on newer cars.  They simply insert a code reader into your data slot under the dash and scan for any SES/DTC codes.  If none are present, you pass, if a DTC is present, you fail.

Posted

Lane that's great news.  I hated when I had to take my minivan down there and them rev it up.  I think my '95 Blazer has OBDII, can anyone verify?

 

Joe

Posted
Lane that's great news.  I hated when I had to take my minivan down there and them rev it up.  I think my '95 Blazer has OBDII, can anyone verify?

 

Joe

Your '95 is OBDI unless it was originally sold in California.  Otherwise OBDII for GM wasn't in the rest of the 49 states until '96.

 

I think you'll need to roller test your truck though as it is now 7 years old.  The new car that don't do the IM240 (roller) test are cars that are 0-3 years old.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,694 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...