Jump to content

Side by sides


mkenum79

Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone on here into side by sides? I'm looking to upgrade to one for hunting and trail riding. Been looking into the Kawasaki Teryx and the Teryx4, Can Am Commander XT 800 and the Yamaha Wolverine R Spec. I've know several people that have had issues with the Polaris RZR with constant breakdowns and fixes so not really interested in the Polaris. The new Honda Pioneer 1000 looks interesting, but something about it just doesn't look right to me. Really need something with a usable bed so the full-sport mode units are out of the question. Would like to get something sporty and utilitarian all in the same package no Polaris Rangers or something similar. So if anyone has any input, please feel free to comment. Also if anyone is in the market for a 2006 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI 4x4 in good shape in the North Alabama area let me know. I'm motivated to sell.

Posted

I know you said you're not into the Polaris, but their new General is a mix of sport and utility. Equivalent to the commander basically. I'm a can am guy myself but my parents just got a Polaris Rzr XP and so far, with only about 5 hours on it and me running the piss out of it, it definitely feels like a very solid machine. It was a toss up between the rzr and the maverick. Maverick seats are more comfy IMO but they feel too top heavy for cornering well. That still won't stop me from purchasing a Maverick in the future, I've had great luck with my Outlander that I'd buy Can Am again

Posted

I've got an '11 Ranger 500 midsize (bought new) w/ about 3400 miles on it. My only issue was a sliced CV boot (my fault). I use it for work on our woodlot & recreational riding. It's not used as a "toy".

Posted

I am in the Polaris camp as well. I have a RZR 570. I work it more so than using it as a toy. Passed on the Ranger since it was too big for some of the tighter areas on my property. I love it. Have about 50hrs on the motor and have not had any issues. At times, I wish the bed was larger. However, when I need more more room, I use a mini trailer. It has no issues pulling and braking with heavy loads. I'd buy again

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Old thread, adding my 2 cents. I am in the Polaris RZR camp. Still saving for one. Of my friends they all have RZR's and there are probably about 5 in the group. New and used they are holding well for all of them. Matt, what did you end up getting?

Posted

Ended up going with the Yamaha Wolverine R spec with EPS in camo. I was really surprised by this little unit. The ride is crazy smooth. Power is respectable for it only having a 708cc engine. Has full differential lock and climbs like a mountain goat. I've had it up some pretty steep rocky hills and it just sticks and goes. Primarily bought for hunting, trail riding and working around the house and it fits the bill for those 3 needs.

post-147896-0-68947600-1482764981_thumb.jpg

post-147896-0-68947600-1482764981_thumb.jpg

post-147896-0-68947600-1482764981_thumb.jpg

post-147896-0-68947600-1482764981_thumb.jpg

Posted

Ended up going with the Yamaha Wolverine R spec with EPS in camo. I was really surprised by this little unit. The ride is crazy smooth. Power is respectable for it only having a 708cc engine. Has full differential lock and climbs like a mountain goat. I've had it up some pretty steep rocky hills and it just sticks and goes. Primarily bought for hunting, trail riding and working around the house and it fits the bill for those 3 needs.

Nice! Me and my dad test drove one of those before the rzr he bought. Nice little machine and if he wasn't only going to be using the machine for trail riding only that would be his pick. Seems like those had some good low end power from what I remember! Camo is always the best color bc it shows the least wear over time!

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Something from Polaris more in alignment with the Yamaha Wolverine R would probably be the Polaris General. Don't know if it comes in camo though. =)

I mentioned it in the 2nd post above lol

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Posted

I have owned 4 Polaris machines over the years. Right now I have a 2016 RZR 1000 XP. I have had good luck with allof them. PoPo gets a bad rap on break downs purely because they have out sold all other SxS combined 5 to 1. 5 times more machines to break down.They are no worse than any other machine and better than most. Good luck with the Yamaha and congrats on the new toy. Yamaha makes a quality product, you should get years of work and fun out of it.

  • 4 months later...
Posted

I got my first last year. it is a 16 polaris ranger 570 midsize. So much fun, and great around the yard.

14448859_652800421546077_512780438821788

Posted

Bro wondered why I didn't get a 800 when I bought 500. For our woodlot, the 500 is perfect. It can get into spots where we'd have to brush the trails wider.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Bought brand new back in 09 a 700 Rhino sport edition. Plow snow, haul fire wood, wifes motorized lawn cart, push sprint cars at the local dirt track & trail ride the crap out of it riding with other brands with their problems. I've had no trouble in over 3600 miles other than basic maint. It's been a darn good machine.

Yamaha is second to none in quality. Just wish GM would make a SXS wouldn't that be cool?. Can only dream...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
    • So, lot's of googling and reading, and a trial fit found, that indeed they hit the newer fatter caliper. I did some re-testing today, and found just 3/16" worth of washers was enough for the wheel to spin freely. I added 2 more on each, and again it spun freely. Tested lock to lock with the 4 washers, about 5/16" not quite the 3/8" Im considering, but pretty close. No issues. I've been looking at the BORA .375" spacers and using extended lugnuts to get back lost thread due to the spacer. All the ET lugs I've seen are all .33" reach inside the wheel lug holes. For those that don't like spacers or think they're unsafe, I think it depends on what type of spacers you're using and making sure you get good quality hubcentric ones, and if you're using bolt on ones, regular mainenance, checking the spacer lugs. Not wanting or needing that much spread. Looking for the minimum that will let me run these rims and tires.  it does look to stick out a little, but I really want put these on. and use the stock all-terrains in the winter. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...