Jump to content

Elite e2x vs. UPR Plug n Play


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

In my opinion the can part is all the same. The nly major difference is the connectors they use. If 1 works better then the other I'm sure it's very minimal. Not even enough to notice. Put a picture of both on a wall. Spin yourself around and whichever you.touch first buy it

 

Not so. The e2x is clearly larger and thus less chance of overfilling with condensation in cold weather and/or needs checking on less often. Also, the "guts" must be different between the two. All of this talk of chambers, etc. reminds me of the afore-mentioned barkers at the fair. The UPR appears to have nicer hoses and connections but it's about system performance, not looks.

Posted

A few of my buddies have the 100 dollar cans they installed. Work fine for years and still on if you.empty it out periodically you'll be fine.

Posted

 

Not so. The e2x is clearly larger and thus less chance of overfilling with condensation in cold weather and/or needs checking on less often. Also, the "guts" must be different between the two. All of this talk of chambers, etc. reminds me of the afore-mentioned barkers at the fair. The UPR appears to have nicer hoses and connections but it's about system performance, not looks.

 

If you look closer at all the pictures as the UPR Plug n Play™ Dual Valve Catch Can sits lower and closer to the engine greatly reducing and even eliminate any condensation and moisture. This is designed just to eliminate the need for a much larger capacity and I speak from experience as UPR does sell much larger Catch Cans. Also, there is zero obstruction and difficulty when you remove the UPR Plug n Play™ CSS to put oil in the engine as a funnel fits with a ton of space in every direction and does not require any additional time or skill to change.

 

You can see from the images that the UPR sits well below the top of the CSS and offers plenty of room with or without a cold air intake for easy oil changes. We also mount the UPR Plug n Play™ Dual Valve Catch Can further away from the firewall to keep it more accessible.

 

I just like to keep the facts correct and to the point.

 

FC2E1FEC-36D8-4742-B301-D489E83B41B3_zps

 

Joe

Posted

Ok, so I just went out and emptied mine after approx 5000km (Canada Eh). This is the most i've emptied out of it to date.

 

FAtNcbl.jpg

EiIHH1I.jpg

 

 

Any issues with the hoses? How much room below the drain? Enough to get a water bottle beneath it?

Posted

 

 

Any issues with the hoses? How much room below the drain? Enough to get a water bottle beneath it?

I've had no issues with the hoses. There's definitely enough room for a water bottle, that's normally what I use but I couldn't find any in my house. You have to fit it in a little crooked but it still works. The only downside is it's a pain to reach in with the water bottle AND open the valve. I think any catch can would be a pain though considering the trucks sit so high.

Posted

I've had no issues with the hoses. There's definitely enough room for a water bottle, that's normally what I use but I couldn't find any in my house. You have to fit it in a little crooked but it still works. The only downside is it's a pain to reach in with the water bottle AND open the valve. I think any catch can would be a pain though considering the trucks sit so high.

 

 

The UPR sitting "lower and closer to the engine" would make it that much more of a pain to get at with something. The idea of attaching some sort of hose is intriguing, although my crawling under trucks days are behind me.

Posted

 

 

The UPR sitting "lower and closer to the engine" would make it that much more of a pain to get at with something. The idea of attaching some sort of hose is intriguing, although my crawling under trucks days are behind me.

Even with a hose going under the engine you would still need to open the valve somehow from underneath, or have a second person up top. Both units will be a pain to empty. Im 5'11" and still need a stool and to lean into my bay to empty the damn thing. Its only a handful of times a year I empty it though so it doesnt bug me too much.
Posted

Even with a hose going under the engine you would still need to open the valve somehow from underneath, or have a second person up top. Both units will be a pain to empty. Im 5'11" and still need a stool and to lean into my bay to empty the damn thing. Its only a handful of times a year I empty it though so it doesnt bug me too much.

 

 

A hose attached to the bottom of the valve would be the ticket. Then you'd just need to slide a little pan in and out under the truck. You'd still have to get at the valve though. My concern is the cold here 6 or so months of the year and, presumably, having to empty much more often. Again, there appears to be no clear choice. Maybe cost should decide?

Posted

 

Duckfart, I like it. Nice to see another MN Twins fan. Was it Bert Blyleven who coined that term for the twins?

 

I have Elite Catch Can, mounted in the rear. I'm not sure what model Elite it is, I forget, but it works great. Thanks for the reminder to empty it, I just ran out and did that.

 

 

Yeah ----- good ole Bert. Spelling compliments of Dick Bremer. I've been a "fan" since they first arrived in town but I'm becoming increasingly weary of ownership viewing their fans as nothing more than pockets to be picked.

Posted

 

 

A hose attached to the bottom of the valve would be the ticket. Then you'd just need to slide a little pan in and out under the truck. You'd still have to get at the valve though. My concern is the cold here 6 or so months of the year and, presumably, having to empty much more often. Again, there appears to be no clear choice. Maybe cost should decide?

I have other customers that run the fitting off the bottom of the catch can with a hose and mount the drain valve at the end of the hose to access it easily under the car. Just to share other options.

 

Joe

Posted

I have other customers that run the fitting off the bottom of the catch can with a hose and mount the drain valve at the end of the hose to access it easily under the car. Just to share other options.

 

Joe

 

 

Whatever involves hands and knees would be a Plan B for me.

Posted

 

 

Whatever involves hands and knees would be a Plan B for me.

 

LOL, I hear you. There are many options for draining the system.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,938
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    C. Hart
    Newest Member
    C. Hart
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 592 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks everyone for the help!   I'm going to stop into the scales one of these days and weigh my axels, for the time being, I am going to run Toyo's recommendations and also do a chalk test. I have a tire shop that's going to try their scanner to reprogram and set the the factory psi values lower, and if they can't I'm going to order a scanner and do it myself!
    • You won’t do better than stock exhaust without headers. Just put your favorite muffler on it and it will do the job. 
    • I have seen different people in different places post different sizes of exhaust as stock for my 2014 Sierra L83. Some say 2.5 some say 2.75. I am considering replacing the muffler with a Dynomax Super Turbo, perhaps 17739.  I had the factory L83 5.3 replaced with another L83 5.3 from Jasper Engines. I also put new Walker Cat / Y pipe on. I would appreciate opinions suggestions about what would be a good muffler setup. My main interest is a low rumble and the best flow / fuel mileage I can get. Not interested in straight through glass packs or loud exhaust. Those days are way behind me now.  Thanks Guys.  
    • Its coolant disguised as oil.   TSB 20-NA-166 -  20-NA-166 1..3   "To inspect for this concern, add coolant dye to the system, run the engine through warm up, pressurize the cooling system after warming the engine to operating temperature (let the engine cool overnight) and inspect the suspect cylinder with a borescope for coolant dye evidence. At times it may be necessary to remove the head for inspection. If the head casting line is the concern, the intake port will be wet with a coolant oil mix"     I'd say its the head, and its either leaking at the casting line and dripping down the intake into the cylinder, or its another spot on the casting itself at the cylinder that is getting wet.  
    • Can you sample the pooled liquid, enough to confirm it is oil?   ...That its not fuel or coolant.   Also, make sure combustion gases aren't entering the cooling system.   Simply put, either oil being pushed up past the rings (this really isn't possible), oil leaking past the head gasket, oil leaking past the valve, oil entering through the intake air path. If none of this is likely - it may not be oil.   What could be likely is the fuel injector leaking down. A puddle of gas would still smoke and rough idle. (Same cylinder has the same problem after injector replacement?)   What is the crank time first thing in the morning, when the puddle would be present? Does it seem like the high pressure fuel pump needs an extra second or two to rebuild the pressure that injector 8 may have let bleed off? Check the fuel pressure via a scanner prior to starting the engine.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...