Jump to content

C load or E load BFG KO2 for off road


2004BlueBurb

Recommended Posts

Posted

Oh really? That's cool, thanks for the reply. I called Costco and asked them to look at the sidewall markings on a c rated ko2 and he said it said 2 ply for the sidewall, even though it says the Triguard sidewall on it. I'm just nervous about punctures. Do you do much off road driving on those tires?

I do a lot of caliche ranch roads with mesquite thorns. No problems so far. The Goodyear Duratrac in 255/75x17 is P-rated and 2 ply sidewall, which is why I went with the BFG KO - LT and C rated, three ply sidewall. Now, the E-rated will be really stiff and heavy, maybe better for your Suburban 'cause it's a lot heavier than my reg. cab.

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Another option is KO2 255/80x17 load range E - high profile, tall and narrow. Myself, I prefer high profile 75 or 80 series, better for airing down and offers some rim protection. They should be about 33" overall diameter.

Posted

Yeah, I think the E will be better as well. The Burb weighs about 5500 or so empty. I'm just bummed to lose mpg because there isn't much to begin with, lol. Hopefully it's only 1mpg.

Posted

Another option is KO2 255/80x17 load range E - high profile, tall and narrow. Myself, I prefer high profile 75 or 80 series, better for airing down and offers some rim protection. They should be about 33" overall diameter.

They don't offer that size in the bfg ko2, at least I couldn't find it on the bfg site or Discount Tire. Thanks though.

  • 3 months later...
Posted
On 8/6/2017 at 7:23 PM, 2004BlueBurb said:

Hello all, just joined this forum. Have a 2004 Suburban 1500 4x4. Looking to get new tires this week, and I'm debating to get either a c load or E load all Terrain. Pretty much made up my mind on Bfg ko2, just not sure the size (17"rims, stock height) tire and load yet. I go off road once every month or so, usually rocky terrain, some mud, sand. Anybody put the E tires on their rig? If so, what mpg loss have you experienced? Currently have 255/75R17 BFG KM tires on it which are C treated, but they have the 3 ply sidewall, the same size tire in the ko2 version has a 2 ply sidewall. The km tire is great, just noisy.

So what did you get and how do you like them?

Posted
10 hours ago, swathdiver said:

So what did you get and how do you like them?

I ended up getting the BFG KO2 Tires, 275/70R17. Great tire, quiet, seem to have a lot of grip (haven't taken them on anything more than washboard road with minor terrain). I can't wait to take them on a more challenging trail. I also have put on KYB Monomax monotube shocks, replacing Rancho 5000 series, night and day difference! I love the KYB shocks!

Posted

I have the 265-70-17 in a C-Ply.  About 7,000 miles on them now and have been playing with air pressure.  BFG said to run them at 50 psi on my truck.  42 psi covers the GAWR and GVWR.  At the rate they were wearing when running them in the 30s they would barely last to 40k miles.

 

What ply are yours and how much air are you running in them?

 

I agree, they are quiet and the truck runs like its on rails with those tires.  My suspension is original still.

Posted
On 11/26/2017 at 2:08 AM, swathdiver said:

I have the 265-70-17 in a C-Ply.  About 7,000 miles on them now and have been playing with air pressure.  BFG said to run them at 50 psi on my truck.  42 psi covers the GAWR and GVWR.  At the rate they were wearing when running them in the 30s they would barely last to 40k miles.

 

What ply are yours and how much air are you running in them?

 

I agree, they are quiet and the truck runs like its on rails with those tires.  My suspension is original still.

Mine are E rated,10 ply. And I run about 42-45 in them. Have only had them less than 5k, so I can't report on wear yet, but so far so good. 

 

I've redone the front suspension on mine, did that when we bought it 2 years ago. Also added sleeves to inner tie rod ends. I found a guy who makes brackets for a front strut conversion, gives you part numbers and instructions too. Going to be doing that in a couple years probably. 

Posted

Thanks!  Just learned about sleeves and will add them when we do the level.

 

My truck came with E rated Rugged Trails.  They were so heavy that the truck would not coast and felt like it had a high stall converter.  The sidewalls on the C are the same as the E.  What kind of mileage are you getting with yours?  Mine is not very good, barely get 16 on the highway and 13-14 around town babying it.  

Posted
12 hours ago, swathdiver said:

Thanks!  Just learned about sleeves and will add them when we do the level.

 

My truck came with E rated Rugged Trails.  They were so heavy that the truck would not coast and felt like it had a high stall converter.  The sidewalls on the C are the same as the E.  What kind of mileage are you getting with yours?  Mine is not very good, barely get 16 on the highway and 13-14 around town babying it.  

You're welcome! Are you sure about the sidewalls being the same? I did a lot of research on the tires before buying them and pretty much all the c tires I found and saw were two ply sidewalls. I even went to a tire store to read the sidewall, haha. That's why I went with the e rated tires because they have three ply sidewalls. With the tires and wheels I have on it now, they are about 1.5 inches taller than stock. I haven't had my speedometer recalibrated yet, but around town I'm getting 13-14 as well, maybe 15 on the highway. But if you calculate the tire size difference, it may go up 1 or 2mpg. 

Posted

If it was a truck then E but since it is a Burb then C will work just fine.  E on a truck because you never know when you might want to haul some weight and that way you know the tires will hold up.

Posted
2 hours ago, 2004BlueBurb said:

You're welcome! Are you sure about the sidewalls being the same? I did a lot of research on the tires before buying them and pretty much all the c tires I found and saw were two ply sidewalls. I even went to a tire store to read the sidewall, haha. That's why I went with the e rated tires because they have three ply sidewalls. With the tires and wheels I have on it now, they are about 1.5 inches taller than stock. I haven't had my speedometer recalibrated yet, but around town I'm getting 13-14 as well, maybe 15 on the highway. But if you calculate the tire size difference, it may go up 1 or 2mpg. 

Yes, my research and BFG confirmed it during a conversation.  My speedometer is calibrated to the tires via my Tech2 which are stock size for my year, 265-70-17.  The GMT900 2500s that came with E rated 265-70-17 tires are to run them 50 psi in front and 60 psi in the rear according to the door sticker.  Funny, I don't recall actually reading the sidewall since I got them.  But, my memory is not what it once was either!  Will take a look tomorrow if I don't forget! 

Posted
33 minutes ago, swathdiver said:

Yes, my research and BFG confirmed it during a conversation.  My speedometer is calibrated to the tires via my Tech2 which are stock size for my year, 265-70-17.  The GMT900 2500s that came with E rated 265-70-17 tires are to run them 50 psi in front and 60 psi in the rear according to the door sticker.  Funny, I don't recall actually reading the sidewall since I got them.  But, my memory is not what it once was either!  Will take a look tomorrow if I don't forget! 

Haha, yeah, I called BFG on the tires I got the first time, 255/75R17 C rated, and the said they were three ply sidewalls. I got them installed at Discount Tire, read the side of the tire, and they are two!! So I went back and exchanged them for the slightly bigger, no doubt heavier, E rated tires, 275/70R17. The reason I was set on three ply sidewalls is because I like to go off road and a lot of the terrain here is rocky. Plus, when I'm hauling a trailer or have the truck full of people, I like they extra stability and strength. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,979
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 507 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...