Jump to content

3.73 re-gear


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, KARNUT said:

Tire technology was a little more advanced than that. I can remember going with my pops to get Michelin tires on an 65 Electra 225.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, my fathers '64 Ford Galaxie 500XL 390 4 barrel (300 hp) had the AM radio with reverberator!  LOL

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
7 hours ago, KARNUT said:

Tire technology was a little more advanced than that. I can remember going with my pops to get Michelin tires on an 65 Electra 225.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sure, Michelin's been around much longer than that, but in 65 they wouldn't have been radials on a NA production car.  

 

 

 

Posted

I raced on bias ply tires. Bought them as long as they sold them. Early radials were not what they are today and even back then bias wasn't that bad. 

 

The 6L80 has a very low first gear. 4.03:1 with a second gear close to that of an old four speed close ratio. 2.36:1 and then it has two stages of overdrive. 0.85 for fifth and 0.67 for sixth. Third and fourth are 1.53:1 and 1.15 respectively. The C6 automatic in my first Ford had a 2.46 low gear, 1.46 second and direct drive third. The Ford with the 3.0:1 rear end then had an overall ratio of 7.38:1 in low gear or about the same as the 6L80 does in second (7.62:1) with the trucks 3.23 rear gear. In low this trucks low gear over all ratio is 13.02:1. To get a first gear that low back in the day I needed a rear gear of 5.36:1! ( put a 4.30 in her later)

 

With the 390's 401 ft./lb. torque and 7.38 low gear this 4500 lb. car had a wheel torque of 2958 ft./lb. The 305 ft./lb. torque of my 4.3 six banger coupled with it's 13.02 low gear supplies 3971 ft./lb. to my RCSB that weighs a few hundred pounds more, 300 to be exact. The Ford needed a 4.11:1 gear to equal the low gear thrust of this pickups low gear launch. A similar result could be obtained with an Impala or C10 with a 396 and a TH-400 on a 3.08 gear. 

 

Once out on the road at 70 mph the Ford of old needs to turn nearly a thousand rpm faster (2675 rpm) that the current Chevy (1690 rpm).

 

The Chevy at 2/3 the displacement and spinning 2/3 the speed gets nearly twice the MPG and lives over twice as long but acts like it's actually powered by a bigger motor than yesteryears 390.  

 

It isn't better oil or better metallurgy or better heat treats that makes the new ones last longer and feel more powerful. It is straight up math and physics. The rest is smoke an mirrors. (marketing)

 

Posted

I ran 373s back in the day. HWY speeds back then was 55. Impalas and novas mostly small blocks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I had 3.73s with my old truck on 315s. Felt like a dog. Wished the entire time I owned it that I would have regeared

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,738
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Mistycool
    Newest Member
    Mistycool
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,937 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I am having similar issues.. 08, 4.8L granted I did had a fender bender and minor damage up front passenger side but I don’t think it had anything to do with it.. I had the high and low pressure checked and my fan for my radiator keeps coming on.. replaced the pressure switch and don’t want to keep throwing parts at it. I did have some minor problems here and there like on long road trips sometimes the ac would get a little warm and then on the highway as soon as I give it a little gas or get a little heavier on the petal it started running cooler. Never had an issue with the ac besides the here and there.. but I also started having issues when I fuel up now it takes a bit to start ( super embarrassing) it runs fine and once started ( only happens after fueling up) starts fine any other time. Could they be related?
    • Spent a small fortune on fuel this weekend.   $6.69 diesel, 18 gallons of that. $6.99 92-octane ethanol free, 10 gallons of that for yard machines $5.59 87-octane for one of the cars, 11 gallons.   $250+ and I didn't even get a tug.   Hormuz ain't Hormuzin again, did not see that coming...LOL
    • Appreciate the advice. I've watched multiple videos. Most showing the most complex for those that have a center console, to one that showed maybe 2 pieces of trim being removed, like 6 screws, pulling back the screen and switch assembly, and installing the inline module. And this was a new/newer Silverado. That didn't look too bad. All the others show alot of trim pieces that need to be removed. I've broken those kind of tabs/clips on my C8 Corvette trying to get to the battery, and that was a lot less clips than what I think is involved here after watching multiple videos and looking at my dash today. I have one on the way. Called a reputable stereo place about installing it and got a "minimum" price of $175. Ouch! Looking forward to seeing what the instructions have to say.
    • Hard to say what the issue might be. Anything from the ability to cool the AC condenser up front, to blend door issues in the HVAC unit, to refrigerant charge, to compressor issues or issues in the lines.   Report back what the techs find on the 29th.   GM has service publications which list acceptable vent temperatures and AC pressures at given ambient temps and humidity. They probably won't touch the system if it's operating within those ranges.   I'm also surprised to hear your 2024 with the L8T is still using R134a? I was pretty sure the HD's had switched to the new refrigerant around 2020.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...