Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I have a 1995 GMC k1500 4x4 with the 5.7L TBI engine in it. I just bought the truck and as it is about 24 years old, it only needs to pass one more emisions test before It is grandfathered and therefore immune to e-checks (I live in northern Ohio) and also before I can get plates for it. The problem is, I've failed e check 3 times. A code 32 pops up every time I test it (on my own with a reader) and when I got the emissions test, high nox is the reason it fails. This would make sense, as code 32 is an egr error, and the egr being faulty would definitely trigger high nox, however:

The egr valve has been replaced (yes, a negative one) 

The egr vacuum solenoid has been replaced 

Map sensor replaced 

Spark plugs, cap, rotor, wires. Replaced

Even went as far as to replace the oxygen sensor.  

There doesn't seem to be any vacuum leaks and every test I've done on any part of the egr system points to it all running correctly. 

 

The kicker is: the truck runs great! No loss in power. Idles great. Super clean and well kept truck. 

 

Notes : it does have a Flowmaster super 10 dual exhaust on it, but it isn't a true dual as only one pipe comes from the catalytic into the exhaust, Then two come out. 

 

Also, high nox seems to be caused by high engine Temps, however, my engine temp on my dash shows that it never gets above about 165 or 170*. Idk if this is relevant but it seemed strange. 

 

Any help is greatly appreciated. I'm really at a loss and I'm running out of time before I need to buy another temporary tag. 

Thanks again - Joe 

Edited by Joeyblaze
Posted

32 is no change seen by map and 02,could the port be clogged?if you suck on the vacuum line,can you get it to stumble?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, riverbanks said:

32 is no change seen by map and 02,could the port be clogged?if you suck on the vacuum line,can you get it to stumble?

There's no buildup inside the egr port and yes, when you suck on the line or when u just push the egr interior with your finger you can get it to stumble quite easily 

Posted

My next thought is to get a new egr valve again, particularly a Delphi or oem one, Bc the one that is in there now, while new, was only thirty bucks on rock auto. I don't want to be blindly throwing money at it, but maybe a more expensive egr valve will work. Any thoughts? Thanks again

Posted
4 minutes ago, riverbanks said:

Argh,did some searching,chevytalk.org,post#2053697,it's got it all in one spot

And ya, I read up on that post earlier. It seems to confirm everything I knew. Like I said tho, I replaced about every part in the egr system, I just can't figure out why it's still throwing a code and failing e check. 

Posted

One item is to put a vacuum gauge on there,see where you're starting from,18 at idle,and back to temp.question, combustion temp. not thermostat,and you have or not,any pinging?

Posted

I'd just throw a cooler thermostat in it to get the head and combustion chamber temps down enough to pass. Only one more year - I wouldn't spend another nickel on useless emission crap.

Posted
5 minutes ago, riverbanks said:

One item is to put a vacuum gauge on there,see where you're starting from,18 at idle,and back to temp.question, combustion temp. not thermostat,and you have or not,any pinging?

No pinging. The motor runs flawlessly. Idles great. Good acceleration. I don't have the combustion temp, but I pointed a laser thermometer on the exhaust manifold(228*f), valve cover(145*), and the Catylitic converter(290) and they seemed to be in a normal range. 

Posted (edited)

High Nox = high combustion temperatures. Higher the temp the worse it gets. There's probably something wrong with the EGR system, but as a CHEAP bandaid, I'd go with a cooler T-stat just to get your sticker. Once that's done, you're home free.

Edited by Jsdirt
Posted
8 minutes ago, Jsdirt said:

I'd just throw a cooler thermostat in it to get the head and combustion chamber temps down enough to pass. Only one more year - I wouldn't spend another nickel on useless emission crap.

With what I just said about the laser Temps, would you still do that. Like I said, the thermostat reading on my dash is showing its not that hot at all. 

Posted

I'll try what you guys are saying. I'll put a new thermostat in it, just really wondering if a differently calibrated egr valve would solve the problem. I need to get it fixed asap like I said but I'd really enjoy it if the check engine light didn't pop on every time I took her on the highway too. Crossing my fingers for possibly better gas mileage with less emissions too. Thanks again. I'll post if I ever figure it out 

Posted

I'd try a 180° t-stat, then, if you have more than a half tank in the truck, or are planning to fill it, throw in a bottle or 2 of gas line antifreeze - that will ensure the cooler t-stat doesn't cause high hydrocarbon emissions during the test.

 

It's ridiculous how some states test for emissions on something over 20 years old. "Moronic" would probably be a better word for it ...

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks again for all the advice. Feel free to put any new ideas up here too. I've been banging heads with a bunch of people. Always nice to hear other people's perspectives

Posted

Yep,stinks,no pun intended,you went by the book for repair,and still a issue,but,you verified power at solenoid,and followed the ecm ground for a problem?so close,man

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
    • So, lot's of googling and reading, and a trial fit found, that indeed they hit the newer fatter caliper. I did some re-testing today, and found just 3/16" worth of washers was enough for the wheel to spin freely. I added 2 more on each, and again it spun freely. Tested lock to lock with the 4 washers, about 5/16" not quite the 3/8" Im considering, but pretty close. No issues. I've been looking at the BORA .375" spacers and using extended lugnuts to get back lost thread due to the spacer. All the ET lugs I've seen are all .33" reach inside the wheel lug holes. For those that don't like spacers or think they're unsafe, I think it depends on what type of spacers you're using and making sure you get good quality hubcentric ones, and if you're using bolt on ones, regular mainenance, checking the spacer lugs. Not wanting or needing that much spread. Looking for the minimum that will let me run these rims and tires.  it does look to stick out a little, but I really want put these on. and use the stock all-terrains in the winter. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...