Jump to content

Harvick/Rudd incident highlights wild night


Elwood

Recommended Posts

Posted

Harvick/Rudd incident highlights wild night

 

 

Sunday, September 07, 2003

 

 

A post-race skirmish between Ricky Rudd and Kevin Harvick Saturday night at Richmond International Raceway resulted in a tongue-lashing from the sanctioning body for both teams' entire pit crews, and will likely bring penalties in the coming week.

 

 

Rudd got into Harvick entering Turn 1 with eight laps remaining in the Chevy Rock & Roll 400, sending Harvick, who was well on his way to a fourth-consecutive top-five, into the outside wall.

 

 

Harvick was furious and made his frustration known by driving his car onto pit road and rubbing it against Rudd's, which was stopped on pit road.

 

 

The drivers then spent several minutes yelling at each other.

 

 

Rudd, busy unbuckling his seatbelts, said several No. 29 crewmen began charging towards him. Rudd said the crewmen then began "walking up and down my car like it is a dadgum runway or something. Bouncing up and down on the roof, up and down on the hood."

 

 

Harvick exited his car, standing atop the window frame, and yelled at Rudd. At some point, according to Rudd, Harvick threw his HANS device at him.

 

 

As the situation escalated, No. 29 jackman Mike Scearce, jumped on top of Rudd's hood, denting it.

 

 

"This is kind of a one-of-a-kind (car) that they just put together, and we didn't have a scratch on it until the end of the race," Rudd said. "It shouldn't have involved crew members basically attacking our car."

 

 

After several minutes NASCAR officials diffused the situation, and each and every member of both teams was summoned to the NASCAR trailer for a meeting with president Mike Helton and Winston Cup director John Darby.

 

 

Harvick emerged approximately an hour later, but neither he nor owner Richard Childress would offer comment on the situation.

 

 

Harvick's team did release a written statement.

 

 

"I can't help but be angry," Harvick said. "We are running for the championship this year and I thought we had another second (place finish) locked up. We got spun out by (Rudd) going into Turn 1 and he took us out. That was pure adrenaline out there on pit road. I was hot and I wanted Ricky to know that."

 

 

"(Kevin) Went down in turn one and he put the brakes on way early. I don't know why," Rudd said. "He must have had a problem, and when he put on the brakes, I got in the back of him."

 

 

NASCAR certainly took notice of the aftermath.

 

 

"We're not going to condone this kind of pit road behavior," said vice president for corporate communications Jim Hunter. "What happens on the racetrack is going to stay on the racetrack and we'll deal with that as best we can. It's our responsibility to deal with that.

 

 

"I can assure you, we were not going to condone the kind of bench-clearing mentality that occurred after the race tonight. We'll definitely have more to say about this on Monday. And I think I can also say there's a strong possibility for penalties."

 

 

Rudd did address the media following the event, and said he understood Harvick's frustration, but that it should have stayed between the two drivers.

 

 

"Kevin, he should be mad. I would be mad if I was him," Rudd said. "But what happened after the race, that was totally uncalled for. I haven't seen anything like it in 28 years of racing."

 

 

 

 

Sounds to me like Rudd is crying alot and exaggerating. I saw it on TV like most of you, and I saw Harvick's team come over and try to refrain him. I saw ONE guy stomp down Rudd's car as they were leaving not what Rudd said (Rudd said the crewmen then began "walking up and down my car like it is a dadgum runway or something. Bouncing up and down on the roof, up and down on the hood."). And as for the HANS device, yeah I saw him throw it as he walked away and it land on top of Rudd's car, but I didn't see Rudd out of the car yet. Now I might be mistaken on that part, but I'm pretty sure Rudd was still in the car, which means he threw it, but he didn't throw it at Rudd.

Posted

I saw it too. Kevin's crew came over to restrain him from going after Ricky. Once they got ahold of Kevin, they left. Certainly looked like they did their best to stay off of Ricky's car as much as they could. Ricky didn't get out until Kevin was gone. Think we'll see some revenge at New Hampshire?

 

Mike

Grand Haven, MI

Posted

Rudd should really make sure there aren't any cameras around before he goes and makes a story up like that. :thumbs:

 

I'm glad to see Harvick express himself. I'm getting kind of tired of all the sugar coated "sponser tools" as drivers.

 

As for what took place on the track, I think the 29 may have gotten a little loose and maybe he DID brake early. But with Rudds "28 years of racing" he should have been able to avoid him. especialy with nobody else around. Rudd may have a dented hood, but Harvick has a destroyed race car.

Posted

I am pretty sure what Kevin threw was after the whole thing was over and he was walking away. It landed on Rudds roof and that was 2 seconds before they interviewed Harvick I think. Anyway I though it was all over when the thing got thrown, maybe not, but either way it didnt have any effect on the situation IMO!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
    • Our customers' safety isn't something we take lightly. To ensure you get the proper assistance for your truck's repairs, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.
    • We appreciate you sharing your experience with your truck. To ensure we get you the proper assistance, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...