Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 7/16/2019 at 2:26 PM, DenverRob26 said:

sweet looking truck! I just got a 2019 High Country Silverado and I am between the 2" factory and the 4" BDS. Wondering what the total heigh with your setup is since I need to fit mine into a 7 foot parking garage. Thanks!

It just barely clears a 7 foot garage. The back of the cab is slightly higher than the Mx antenna when level, (I have coilovers, not the regular spacer lift). 

B3CCDE05-65D3-4055-A1AB-32EE3BAC51F0.jpeg

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Any one know if the 4"  BDS Coilover kit will fit 2020 Silverado with 3.0 Duramax?

No seeing anything to indicate it does or does not but i guess I was expecting there to be a selection on the BDS website.

There is a note that 6" kit will not fit Diesel.

 

Thanks Tom

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Hey boss, So I have a 2020 trail boss LT bought in January and in March I installed A Ready lift 2 inch SST lift kit with came with the front spacers and upper control arms and 3 inch blocks and at the same time I had installed 20s inch fuel blits with 20x12.5x35 Nitto Ridge grapplers ran that for 3 months the ride the ride was really rough with the 2 inch kit and the extra tire plies. So 2 weeks ago I went with the 4 inch BDS lift with BDS upper control arms, Fox DSC Remote Reservoir Coilovers in the front, Fox DSC remote reservoirs in the rear. So a total of a 6 inch lift all around. The truck rides like a dream on and off road. 

Posted
On 7/14/2020 at 3:06 PM, Oscar Rodriguez said:

Hey boss, So I have a 2020 trail boss LT bought in January and in March I installed A Ready lift 2 inch SST lift kit with came with the front spacers and upper control arms and 3 inch blocks and at the same time I had installed 20s inch fuel blits with 20x12.5x35 Nitto Ridge grapplers ran that for 3 months the ride the ride was really rough with the 2 inch kit and the extra tire plies. So 2 weeks ago I went with the 4 inch BDS lift with BDS upper control arms, Fox DSC Remote Reservoir Coilovers in the front, Fox DSC remote reservoirs in the rear. So a total of a 6 inch lift all around. The truck rides like a dream on and off road. 

 

I have 2019 AT4 Carbon Pro - with same RL SST kit - stayed with stock 275/65/18's - have been looking to swap out for BDS - been going back and forth 2.5" or 4" (so 4.5" or 6" overall) - shop tells me to get 4", set springs at 0 pre-load, will be great and not get full 4" lift (so 6" overall).  Feel better overall ride and more travel - I don't really want to go over 4.5" for towing.

 

I had inquired about remote res or piggy back 2.5" for rear - they did not have 6 weeks ago - what did you do for rear shock? 

 

Can you post photo of your truck now complete - so we can see the look.

 

Thanks 1195288232_DP1.thumb.JPG.0c75d35792b45a1ec4d5cde5206dfad4.JPG

Posted
On 7/1/2019 at 4:29 PM, CBRAGA said:

wondering if 37s and oem 20's would fit with little trim...……………………..on the 19+ hmmm

It's been done.

37's on a AT4 with a BDS 4". (Picture Stolen from Facebook, not my truck)

 

The 37's look like 1 single bump your ripping off the front of your bumper. 

Like the look, but looks like very little up travel for your tire before it would have clearance issues. 

 

image.thumb.png.aa0131ae58ccedffc901c47fb177039f.png

 

Facebook post link:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=3626869547339752&set=gm.572106996781326&type=3&eid=ARBgIuQcioAah_m4bhHYZ-5C7mVY80lN4AyLmluJNWLp6F8GIW7XzC5OnyVOjksYHMYavGepRZ1xE1pI&ifg=1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...