Jump to content

LCA bump stops

CO-Stark

Recommended Posts

CO-Stark Enthusiast

CO-Stark

Posted
Posted

Hi all,
I search and found some mentions of the bump stops but not what I'm wondering about. Has anyone changed out the factory lower control arm bump stops for something lower profile? Hoping for a little more up travel, even with the BDS conversion (new upper and lower arms) there's just not much travel and those bump stops stick down almost 3" from the mount, seems like a 1 1/2" or even 2" bump would still do the job but give the shocks more room to do their job...

Thoughts?

davester Senior Enthusiast

davester

Posted
Posted

Are you referring to the yellow part in this picture (yours maybe a different shape and/or color)?

 

If so, that is not a bump stop, but rather a "jounce", and it is part of the front suspension.

Gil H 2010 lmm 05.JPG

CO-Stark Enthusiast

CO-Stark

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 hours ago, davester said:

Are you referring to the yellow part in this picture (yours maybe a different shape and/or color)?

 

If so, that is not a bump stop, but rather a "jounce", and it is part of the front suspension.

 

Yeah that's what I'm looking at, mine is cylindrical with a sort of dome that contacts the arm. Didn't realize it's 'part of the suspension', just looks like a rubber stop. So then the question is why is it so dang close to the lower control arm? Mine has a little more space than that picture after having my coilover conversion done, but there's still barely any travel before that would start to kick in. Why isn't there be more room for the spring (coil or torsion) and shock to do their job?

 

I'm on this kick because I changed some parts on my little commuter truck and doubled the suspension travel and it rides like a dream, so now I'm on the hunt for more travel on the big pig. See any problems with replacing this with something lower profile if it will still absorb a little (not just "stop")?

IMG_1453.JPG

davester Senior Enthusiast

davester

Posted
Posted

Actually, I don't know about those, just about the torsion bar suspension setup.  Yours might be a bump stop, or a combination of jounce/bump stop.

 

You'd need to at least make sure the rest of the bits of the suspension can also most that extra couple of inches.

CO-Stark Enthusiast

CO-Stark

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, davester said:

Actually, I don't know about those, just about the torsion bar suspension setup.  Yours might be a bump stop, or a combination of jounce/bump stop.

 

You'd need to at least make sure the rest of the bits of the suspension can also most that extra couple of inches.

Can't imagine they wouldn't, the coilover kit is a 2-3" lift and it's set at 3", so I have a bare minimum 1" it would be able to travel. I had the torsion bars stock and the lower arm was almost resting on those before the lift...just don't understand why it would be designed that way leaving so little travel.

davester Senior Enthusiast

davester

Posted
Posted

Well, the travel is sufficient for the vast majority of these trucks.  It's likely GM engineers put a decent amount of effort into designing it to function well for their customers.  Just hacking off a bit to allow the a-arms to travel more can cause problems with other parts, such as shocks, u-joints, cv-joints, tires, tie rod joints.

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, CO-Stark said:

Yeah that's what I'm looking at, mine is cylindrical with a sort of dome that contacts the arm. Didn't realize it's 'part of the suspension', just looks like a rubber stop. So then the question is why is it so dang close to the lower control arm? Mine has a little more space than that picture after having my coilover conversion done, but there's still barely any travel before that would start to kick in. Why isn't there be more room for the spring (coil or torsion) and shock to do their job?

 

I'm on this kick because I changed some parts on my little commuter truck and doubled the suspension travel and it rides like a dream, so now I'm on the hunt for more travel on the big pig. See any problems with replacing this with something lower profile if it will still absorb a little (not just "stop")? 

 

 

Coilovers will have more travel than torsion bar that's why the jounce bumper is where it sits. 

 

I assume that having gone to coilover, you no longer have the torsion bars in there? 

 

Do the BDS coilovers have a jounce bumper in them?  On the 1/2 ton Chevy trucks, the OEM struts have the jounce bumper integral to the strut.  Sits right under the bottom of the strut mount.  No bumper on the frame to the lower A arm. 

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, CO-Stark said:

Can't imagine they wouldn't, the coilover kit is a 2-3" lift and it's set at 3", so I have a bare minimum 1" it would be able to travel. I had the torsion bars stock and the lower arm was almost resting on those before the lift...just don't understand why it would be designed that way leaving so little travel.

 

This was from a GMT-800/900 but gives a good visual.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf1bhVI7bL4

CO-Stark Enthusiast

CO-Stark

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 hours ago, newdude said:

 

Coilovers will have more travel than torsion bar that's why the jounce bumper is where it sits. 

 

I assume that having gone to coilover, you no longer have the torsion bars in there? 

 

Do the BDS coilovers have a jounce bumper in them?  On the 1/2 ton Chevy trucks, the OEM struts have the jounce bumper integral to the strut.  Sits right under the bottom of the strut mount.  No bumper on the frame to the lower A arm. 

Correct no torsion bars, and like I said above, theres easily another inch it all can travel because before they adjust the coilovrs up 1" I was sitting that much closer to the 'jounce'.

7 hours ago, newdude said:

 

This was from a GMT-800/900 but gives a good visual.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf1bhVI7bL4

Thanks for that, in that video the jounce looks to give much more than I thought, wonder if mine are the same, in which case they don't limit travel as much as they slow it down til it hits limit, if that makes sense. Thank you.

MNorby Enthusiast

MNorby

Posted
Posted

I'd be half inclined to remove it and remove your springs from the COs and check travel, clearances, and motions with it at bump. If all seems fine figure where full bump should be and trim it to just a touch longer than that to account for compression.

CO-Stark Enthusiast

CO-Stark

Posted
  • Author
Posted
17 hours ago, MNorby said:

I'd be half inclined to remove it and remove your springs from the COs and check travel, clearances, and motions with it at bump. If all seems fine figure where full bump should be and trim it to just a touch longer than that to account for compression.

Yeah that would be ideal, don't know if I have the time for it tho...and the impression I get is those coils are sprung pretty hard in there so I'm not too sure about pulling them out in the garage... I may just see if I can get these off and then look for a generic jounce/stop that's about an inch shorter. We'll see.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • CNH-320
      Electrical Problem - solved

      By CNH-320 · Posted

      Hey everyone, I recently had an issue with my 07 2500HD GMT900. My DRL’s stay on at all times. Right front turn and right mirror turn signal indicator stay on solid at all times. By “at all times” I mean the only way to make them go off is disconnecting the battery. I tore the headlight assemblies out, tried disconnecting the harnesses to eliminate bad wiring at the harness, I unplugged the headlight switch, no change and the mirror turn signal still stayed on. My first thoughts were : Bad bulb and/or socket somewhere, under hood fuse panel bad, bcm bad, tail light or trailer wiring problem, or some random short to power in the harness.  Possibly a bad ground but unlikely. I had a big clue in the fuse panel, it had a burnt smell. I started pulling every fuse that had to do with DRL or right turn/park lamp. Nothing made the right directional turn off but pulling the DRL2 fuse made the DRL’s go out.  After studying wiring diagrams, I found that both problems had that fuse panel in common, the bcm also controls both problems but knowing the fuse panel had a burnt smell I removed and disassembled the fuse panel and found a little corrosion on the printed circuit board.  I ordered a new fuse panel from Amazon for like $260. When it arrived I installed it, and put everything back together, the problem was fixed. I figured the fuse panel needed to be replaced anyway so that was a logical place to start. Hopefully this story helps someone in the future. Regretfully I didn’t scan for codes before I did everything.
    • 2022LtTbZ71
      Service 4wd, ESC light, traction control light on, Service charging system (vehicle may stall)

      By 2022LtTbZ71 · Posted

      That stinks. I’m sitting on the side of the road right now with the same issue. Never had an issue before taking it in for the ground strap recall. Now I’m outside of warranty and they’ll probably want $200 just to diagnose what they already “fixed”. 
    • jagabom (Esquire)
      Passenger seat

      By jagabom (Esquire) · Posted

      I wonder kind of nuts and bolts they will come up with next? Jim
    • OnTheReel
      The Peckish Synapse

      By OnTheReel · Posted

      “It should be recognized, however, that there becomes a point where fuel economy oils do not make much economic sense for the end consumer—we talk about a fuel saving of ~€100 compared to a risk of €1000 Euros if the oil is too thin and causes increased engine wear rates. However, the benefit of these oils accrues to the car manufacturers. If their vehicles can save 1–2% fuel by using a special fuel economy lubricant, then that OEM can drastically reduce the amount of fines they need to pay.”   I liked this and the following paragraph as well but it’s really only touching the beginning of the benefits OEMs see from spec’ing these oils. After you factor in “out of warranty” service work and new car sales when these engines fail before their time, it’s a good racket for them. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you!
    • Atlas
      The Peckish Synapse

      By Atlas · Posted

      Too much voodoo and snake oil.   Time to go EV    😉

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...