Jump to content

Best coilover? Cst, fox, dirt logic, Elka?


coilovergto

Recommended Posts

Posted

After having leveling spacers in my 16 for a couple years I’m just not happy with it.  Which coilover rides the best?  Really thinking about going to a 4” fabtech with dirt logic coilovers or a 4.5” cst with coilovers to get angles back to stock.   Neither kit increases track width.  Which one of those kits rides the best?   I also see Elka makes coilovers for our pickups now. Also tempted to try the Elkas but I’d still have the angles I have now.   So what will ride better cst/fabtech 4” with coilovers or a fox/king/Elka setup for 2.5” ?

Posted

You do know you will not get a straight answer. You will get answers from people that think a specific brand is the best just because they think so. You will get an answer because thats what they have and think it's the best. Feel or comfortable is subjective to the individual. It also depends on what tire and wheel setup you have because that affects the feel also. Also depends what you get if you are always on pavement or also go off road and how much. All the companies you mentioned are of the same level of quality so it just depends on what you choose from them and how you set it up to get the feel you want.

Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk

Posted
After having leveling spacers in my 16 for a couple years I’m just not happy with it.  Which coilover rides the best?  Really thinking about going to a 4” fabtech with dirt logic coilovers or a 4.5” cst with coilovers to get angles back to stock.   Neither kit increases track width.  Which one of those kits rides the best?   I also see Elka makes coilovers for our pickups now. Also tempted to try the Elkas but I’d still have the angles I have now.   So what will ride better cst/fabtech 4” with coilovers or a fox/king/Elka setup for 2.5” ?

 If you’re interested in the leveled look, CST is an excellent choice but you’ll definitely need new UCA’s. They’re NOT going to lift it very high, 2-2.5” depending on where the coils are set but will definitely notice a difference versus using spacers. The higher you go, the rougher the ride as you’re taking away from the travel. CST makes a fantastic 4.5” lift which I’d recommend over any other especially if you’re looking to get around 4-5” lift. This lift also WILL NOT cut up your front Diff and allows you to keep your stock UCA’s, wheels, tires and keeps stock turning radius without widening your track width like you get in others.

 

Here’s my 2018 GMC SLT Z71 Standard Cab with 33.” + KO2’s

 

8a1a27e7b4d82c9457026f8d4cce22a3.plist

 

 

 

 

Sent from Above

 

 

 

Posted

I already have uppers. Really leaning towards the cst 4.5 or the fabtech 4.  None of the other kits really interest me because they increase track width. Most of the time I’m on the road and want to get all my angles back to factory.   I’ll probably call cst in the morning and see what they can do.  I can get the fabtech 4” with remote rezi dirt logics for 3300.  

Posted

CST Lift 14-18 Chevy/GMC 1500’s

Lift Approx: 1750.00
Rear Bilsteins 5100’s: 140.00
Front CST Remote Coil Approx: 1400.00

Total just for parts $3290.00 plus installation

I’d call CST and see if and when they’re going to be doing their 25% off but New Level sells them below MSRP

I always recommend Bilsteins in the beginning and then later you’ll know if and whether or not you need to save up for coil overs. The rear fox cst etc all resemble the 5100’s. So, unless you’ve got money burning a hole in your pocket, I’d recommend doing the lift, front and rear 5100’s and after everything is installed I’d go from there. If you’re an OffRoad guy then I’d jump on the coil overs but if not, Bilsteins would definitely do the job!

https://www.newlevelmotorsports.com/cskc3191.html?cmp=googleproducts&kw=cskc3191&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIhsPDouno5wIVRr7ACh1tAwzyEAQYASABEgIvpPD_BwE


Sent from Above

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 37's would probably fit with a 3" lift. GM only has two gear ratios for these trucks 3.73 for gas and 3.42 for diesel. And they can't be programmed for anything else at the moment. The rough country module just corrects the speedometer and odometer to adjust for tire size it's not a programming device.   You haven't said if your truck is gas or diesel, but for a gas truck the 10L1000 with 3.73 gears has a lower final drive ratio than the 6L90 it replaced would if it were swapped to 4.10s. GM used the same 3.73 gearing in 6 speed gas trucks. I don't think you'll have any issue running 37's with the 10 speed other than the reduction in mpg and towing/weight capacity which is as much of a function of the lift as the tire size.
    • Actually, it probably was the brakes.  It's weird the way the messages came across, but I took it to the dealer thinking that something was wrong with the sensor and in fact, the rear brakes were shot.  What I don't understand is why the messages never said, your brake pads are low.  First I got the message I posted above, taking about new pads being detected.  Then I got a message saying that the system needed repaired.  It never said, change your brake pads.
    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...