Jump to content

Factory garage door opener

Jason Mitchell
 Share

Recommended Posts

Jason Mitchell Enthusiast

Jason Mitchell

Posted
Posted

I'm looking to add factory garage door opener. It appears that GM has moved the module from the overhead compartment area to the rear view mirror. It also contains a self contained/removable remote that stores inside the bottom of the mirror. GM part 84350232 according to gmpartsnow.com

 

Does anyone have experience with this part? Do you have it installed from factory? Has anyone here ordered this part and installed?

Brihorse Enthusiast

Brihorse

Posted
Posted

I have a 2020 LT Trail Boss and I bought an overhead console off eBay that had the home link in it. It also has the control for the power sliding rear window which I don't have but it's plug and play. No modifications needed.

  • Thanks 1
  • 2 months later...
Booma1218 Enthusiast

Booma1218

Posted
Posted
On 5/4/2020 at 9:40 PM, Brihorse said:

I have a 2020 LT Trail Boss and I bought an overhead console off eBay that had the home link in it. It also has the control for the power sliding rear window which I don't have but it's plug and play. No modifications needed.

was the wiring there for the rear slider even though your truck  like my LT didn’t come with the rear window from the factory?? so if you wanted to add the slider after the wiring is already there?

Brihorse Enthusiast

Brihorse

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, Booma1218 said:

was the wiring there for the rear slider even though your truck  like my LT didn’t come with the rear window from the factory?? so if you wanted to add the slider after the wiring is already there?

The harness wasn't there as far as I could tell, but you would be able to plug it into the overhead and control it if you wanted to if you bought a harness.

  • 2 weeks later...
Booma1218 Enthusiast

Booma1218

Posted
Posted
On 7/30/2020 at 10:04 PM, Brihorse said:

The harness wasn't there as far as I could tell, but you would be able to plug it into the overhead and control it if you wanted to if you bought a harness.

When you bought the over head console with the garage opener in it was it plug and play with the home link???My 2020 LT has just the plain overhead console and I want the one with the slider button,and garage opener buttons.

Brihorse Enthusiast

Brihorse

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Booma1218 said:

When you bought the over head console with the garage opener in it was it plug and play with the home link???My 2020 LT has just the plain overhead console and I want the one with the slider button,and garage opener buttons.

Yes, plug and play. Only one harness plugs into the overhead console. It just feeds power to everything in the overhead console. Mine has the control for the slider also but I don't have one.

Booma1218 Enthusiast

Booma1218

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Brihorse said:

Yes, plug and play. Only one harness plugs into the overhead console. It just feeds power to everything in the overhead console. Mine has the control for the slider also but I don't have one.

Thank you..

  • 8 months later...
viperdad Enthusiast

viperdad

Posted
Posted
On 7/30/2020 at 8:04 PM, Brihorse said:

The harness wasn't there as far as I could tell, but you would be able to plug it into the overhead and control it if you wanted to if you bought a harness.

I just got delivery of a new at4 without sunroof and rear sliding window. I took off the upper console like you did and I'm sure you noticed there was a large unused plug there. I want to replace that to add the new console with the control for the rear window but y ou dont think that big plug could be the harness for the rear window?

18e545a7-b4b4-466a-b438-cd4194cb0cb0.jpg

d1b1df36-669a-40ad-9c5e-7dfe5b63c0a2.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • cautious optimist
      2027 Chevrolet Silverado: Official Discussion

      By cautious optimist · Posted

      I never understood the hate for the column shifter. The console shifter just gets in the way, takes up prime cargo space and in my wife's Jeep, the dog constantly bumps the console shifter into neutral!    Best choice ever to just make it a column shifter across the lineup and be done with it.    (Bonus: Makes swapping from a 5 seater to a six seater far easier)
    • cautious optimist
      2027 Chevrolet Silverado: Official Discussion

      By cautious optimist · Posted

      You nailed it with 6 trims. 
    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • James Beyer
      Trading 7.3 (Godzilla) for G.M.C gas

      By James Beyer · Posted

      Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...