Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm experiencing the same issue, especially when pulling a good load.  Hauling hay in western CO, empty flatbed gooseneck weighing about 5k, then loaded with 14k of hay back up hill to the house.  7 trips, 882 miles, half without hay, burned over 5 gallons of DEF.

 

Truck handled the load nicely, really like the 10 speed, topped out on a 1 mile 7'% grade at 48 MPH.  GVW around 27k....Not bad starting at 45 to make the curve at the bottom....

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks CO 2020.  I guess I should be happy with my 300 miles per gallon.  :)  Hopefully GM will figure out what is going on.  I asked my dealer for the  grater test that was mentioned earlier.  Crickets.

Posted

@gjohnston7, that's my fault...I called it the "cheese grater test" but it's actually the "cheese cloth test". They said that they had to put a cheese cloth over something to check the amount of particulates coming through the exhaust. I found a similar article about it: https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2019/MC-10161931-9999.pdf

 

Sorry for the confusion on the name of the test.

 

 

Posted

I posted a thread on this a few weeks back. I’m getting 300-400 per gallon towing 9k lbs trailer. My sensor misreads all the time. Just filled up and it shows half empty still. About 500 miles into a 2,500 mile trip over the next 5 days. Hoping I don’t end up in throttle mode limping down the highway because this sensor is off. Any way to reset the sensor?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I also have a 2020.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Take it in to the dealer.  It is my understanding that they have two different software upgrades that help with the sensor.  It improved the accuracy for me but it is still a long way from perfect.   It sure is looking like the 2020 Silverados are getting 300-400 per gallon of DEF.  I wish that GM would just come out and say that is going to be how it is if that is really what the expected performance is going to get.  I hate the thought of buying a Ram or Ford but this isn't going to work for me.  I worry about being caught in the middle of nowhere as well.

 

The dealer said the cheese cloth test is for something different and won't address our issue so no go there.

  • Like 1
Posted

Was at the dealership today for an error code and when i got my truck back they said there was a recall on the def system and they took care of it while I was there...They said it was something to do with reengaging the def cycle ....didnt sound like it was anything that would help the cause...I am on the road in the morning so if i notice anything i will post up

  • Like 1
Posted

Just brought the truck in for oil change, DEF top off, tire rotation, and replace the fuel filter (at 29% after 12k miles). Lots of towing so not getting anywhere near the 18-20k it’s expected to last.

I asked them to check DEF system for recall or SERVICE BULLETIN and they found a software reprogram. They think it’ll help with the sensor reading the levels accurately now. I was having a problem where I fill up and it shows it was still half empty for a few hundred miles. My concern is more with the sensor because if the truck thinks it’s out of DEF and it’s not, then my speed will be limited. Sometimes it was showing full immediately. Software update likely won’t help with mileage. Techs thought 300-400 miles per gallon of DEF while towing was on par with what they’ve seen. Will report back after I put another 1k miles or so on the truck to let you know if it helps with sensor or burn rate. See bulletin number below.

24c0aede18cca50f6b72d64becb011e9.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I seem to have the opposite problem with the DEF. I have a 2 week old 2500 AT4 Duramax and it has about 1600 miles on it and the DEF level hasn't moved off of full. This is my first diesel so not sure if thats normal given the mileage on the truck

Posted

Likely your sensor is not working. I bet you could get 2-3 gallons in there if you fill it up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
17 hours ago, cNate said:

Likely your sensor is not working. I bet you could get 2-3 gallons in there if you fill it up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

When I got it home from the 425 mile trip from buying the truck, the DEF tank was half empty, so I topped it off then. So it was filled at about the 500 mile mark and since that point it hasn't moved. Which means I've put 1150 miles on it and the DEF gauge hasn't budged.

 

I'll try to add some and see if it takes it. Talked to the dealer today and they said they hadn't see any where the DEF gauge wasn't dropping, only that the low DEF indicator was coming on prematurely.

  • Like 1
Posted
When I got it home from the 425 mile trip from buying the truck, the DEF tank was half empty, so I topped it off then. So it was filled at about the 500 mile mark and since that point it hasn't moved. Which means I've put 1150 miles on it and the DEF gauge hasn't budged.
 
I'll try to add some and see if it takes it. Talked to the dealer today and they said they hadn't see any where the DEF gauge wasn't dropping, only that the low DEF indicator was coming on prematurely.

Let us know how much you can get in there and if you’ve been towing. Dealership claimed upwards of 1k miles per gallon not towing. I’m surprised your dealership didn’t know about the service bulletin to reprogram the module. Could be because mine was manufactured last summer and purchased in October.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
1 hour ago, cNate said:


Let us know how much you can get in there and if you’ve been towing. Dealership claimed upwards of 1k miles per gallon not towing. I’m surprised your dealership didn’t know about the service bulletin to reprogram the module. Could be because mine was manufactured last summer and purchased in October.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Haven't towed anything yet. And as far as the dealer goes, all I did was called one of the service advisors on the phone...maybe i'll take it in one day. 

 

Thanks for your help

Posted

Would be very happy to learn you’re getting 1k+ per gallon not towing!! Thanks!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, cNate said:

Would be very happy to learn you’re getting 1k+ per gallon not towing!! Thanks!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'll try to add some tomorrow and see how much I can squeeze in and update you guys.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,532 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...