Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Im on the verge on buying this but at $200 of plastic isnt getting to me that it will make any performance gains. For the ones who has bought it, was it worth it and can you tell me your first hand experience after installed ?

Posted
1 hour ago, 808 HI said:

Im on the verge on buying this but at $200 of plastic isnt getting to me that it will make any performance gains. For the ones who has bought it, was it worth it and can you tell me your first hand experience after installed ?

Never heard of this before. Just went to their website. Seems like a very nice product. I might have to grab me when "whenever" my S & B intake comes in. Been over 2 weeks since I ordered it on realtrucks.com.  Let me know if you get one and how you like it. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, TNTSilverado said:

Never heard of this before. Just went to their website. Seems like a very nice product. I might have to grab me when "whenever" my S & B intake comes in. Been over 2 weeks since I ordered it on realtrucks.com.  Let me know if you get one and how you like it. 

I like the design and what its meant for but at $200 im not sure if im just buying the name or if its really useful when it comes to daily driving. Would like to pair this with my aFe intake if theres performance benefits. Waiting on people who has this for input. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Install is easy,  they say on the site that it won’t work with the aero shutters. I have them on mine and it worked just fine, the shutters just close at about 55mph from what I could find. I put roughly 500 interstate miles on the truck the day I installed it(7/5/2020),  and couldn’t really tell a difference. Today I removed the top left and top right shutters and it felt like it had a little more pep on the interstate. To remove the two shutters I gently bowed them and worked them out with the intake in place. It would be much easier when the intake is not in.

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Presley said:

Install is easy,  they say on the site that it won’t work with the aero shutters. I have them on mine and it worked just fine, the shutters just close at about 55mph from what I could find. I put roughly 500 interstate miles on the truck the day I installed it(7/5/2020),  and couldn’t really tell a difference. Today I removed the top left and top right shutters and it felt like it had a little more pep on the interstate. To remove the two shutters I gently bowed them and worked them out with the intake in place. It would be much easier when the intake is not in.

Could you be more specific on the aero shutters?? I have a 2019 High Country, would it have them? What do they look like.  Thanks 

Edited by TNTSilverado
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, TNTSilverado said:

Could you be more specific on the aero shutters?? I have a 2019 High Country, would it have them? What do they look like.  Thanks 

Here is a picture of a broken one I found online. They are located just behind the grill. Stillen says it won’t work if you have them, but my truck says otherwise ? I just had to remove the top left and top right shutters 

4027717C-215D-4FE2-84DB-7979E001C813.png

Edited by Presley
Posted
31 minutes ago, Presley said:

Here is a picture of a broken one I found online. They are located just behind the grill. Stillen says it won’t work if you have them, but my truck says otherwise ? I just had to remove the top left and top right shutters 

4027717C-215D-4FE2-84DB-7979E001C813.png

Gotcha. I researched them also. Thanks for the picture.  Much appreciated!  Going to check in the morning if I have them on my truck.  The more I look at this Stillen, the more I'm going to get it.   Take care 

Posted
2 hours ago, Presley said:

Install is easy,  they say on the site that it won’t work with the aero shutters. I have them on mine and it worked just fine, the shutters just close at about 55mph from what I could find. I put roughly 500 interstate miles on the truck the day I installed it(7/5/2020),  and couldn’t really tell a difference. Today I removed the top left and top right shutters and it felt like it had a little more pep on the interstate. To remove the two shutters I gently bowed them and worked them out with the intake in place. It would be much easier when the intake is not in.

Would u say it was worth the $200? Or would u rather have gotten something else worthy?

Posted
1 hour ago, 808 HI said:

Would u say it was worth the $200? Or would u rather have gotten something else worthy?

Honestly I’m not sure yet, still to early to tell. But I don’t regret it. I just got it on this Sunday and removed two shutters before coming to work tonight. Looking at it it could use some black duck tape to make the hole where the latch comes through smaller. Stillen could make the piece cover that hole better, but some good black tape will work for now.

Posted
34 minutes ago, Presley said:

Honestly I’m not sure yet, still to early to tell. But I don’t regret it. I just got it on this Sunday and removed two shutters before coming to work tonight. Looking at it it could use some black duck tape to make the hole where the latch comes through smaller. Stillen could make the piece cover that hole better, but some good black tape will work for now.

Thanks ?. Need more input like this. Just dont wanna blow $$$ on a name brand plastic cover that will look nice under the hood if thats all its gonna give me. 

Posted

Guys, I imagine I'll take heat for this but bolt on components like this on a big brick of a pig truck like we have are exercises in futility.  You can put lipstick on a pig but it's still a pig.  There is VERY MINIMAL performance gains from nonsense like this.  It's a damn pickup with a boring engine(s).  They're not made to perform as some are hoping....  Flame suit on.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I emailed them to see if it was compatible with the AT4 with no response? I also have the Rotofab CAI and have been very happy with it.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Jmonty said:

I emailed them to see if it was compatible with the AT4 with no response? I also have the Rotofab CAI and have been very happy with it.

Yeah, I’ve emailed them before and some days they would respond fairly quick, and others they took a bit. I think they are at minimum staff with all that’s going on. I would imagine that it would work, just check online/ get in touch with a dealership and compare the Silverado factory piece to the to the gmc factory piece and check the part numbers on them.

Edited by Presley
Posted
6 hours ago, rikhek said:

Guys, I imagine I'll take heat for this but bolt on components like this on a big brick of a pig truck like we have are exercises in futility.  You can put lipstick on a pig but it's still a pig.  There is VERY MINIMAL performance gains from nonsense like this.  It's a damn pickup with a boring engine(s).  They're not made to perform as some are hoping....  Flame suit on.

LOL!!! Too funny!!!  My "boring" 6.2L is a rocket ship for a pickup truck. It has taken down many mustangs, camaros, a tuned Impala SS, and many ecoboost Furds, plus it can tow my boat to a lake. Now tell me how that is boring? 

 

When I had my 06 Trailblazer SS, there was nothing better than having 4 or 5 people in the vehicle, pulling up to a stop sign, and seeing some young "punk" kid in a mustang wanting to race, thinking his 4.6L was fast. Then mashing the gas pedal, letting the AWD and LS2 do the work and then seeing "him" in my rear view mirror.  It was always priceless. This new 6.2L and 10 speed combo is even more lethal. Any" performance gain", even if it's "minimal" is better than nothing at all.

 

Looking at your avatar, (which is a very nice looking corvette!) you would take any additional performance gain you could get whether it was minimal or not.   Also, not attacking you, just found it very comical! Take care 

 

This is basically a cold air induction that comes from the grill instead of the hood. It's the same concept? Why wouldn't it benefit OUR trucks? 

 

 

Posted (edited)

TNTSilverado,

 

I see you got yourself one of them thar' rocket ship race pickups!  You must have gotten a factory unicorn as the power to weight ratio on these large bricks, even with the 6.2L aren't generally considered exciting.  I imagine you also have straight pipes on it to make it even faster AND louder?

 

Regarding performance and your comment that any performance gain, even if it's minimal is better than nothing is inconsistent with performance minded individuals.  You really need to consider the price you're paying for increased performance.  Installing a $3,000 thingamajig that results in a 4 hp/5 LB-FT gain on a 4,500 lb vehicle with 420HP/460lb-ft stock is a waste of money and effort.  Remember, as ludicrous as the example offered is, you're the one that said "any" gain...

 

Seeing you get your thrills street racing teenagers in clapped out Mustangs and family hauler SUV's against your rocket ship people movers loaded with passengers I can appreciate your lack of understanding of the concept I subscribe.

 

Also, in terms of performance vehicles your 6.2L pickup truck is boring.  Beating a "tuned" Impala SS does little to get my juices flowing.  If you're 16 to 18 years old that would explain the position you espouse.  Go get em' tiger!

Edited by rikhek

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...