Jump to content

Muffler Help

Weiser699
 Share

Recommended Posts

204Denali Enthusiast

204Denali

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, Therickyp said:

These new gen trucks don’t get too loud. My buddy has a 2020 6.2 straight piped and it’s not that loud. The flow master 40 and 44s are too quiet on these truck. If your going with a flow master then get the 10 series. 

You have obviously not heard ATAK's on the 6.2 then, nobody would consider them not loud

204Denali Enthusiast

204Denali

Posted
Posted
On 10/28/2020 at 11:10 PM, Terry Wood said:

I'm in the same dilemma.  I don't mind it "Corsa Sport" loud when I'm on it or even on startup and idle but when I'm just cruising on the highway with the kids, I don't want to really hear it at all.  I've posted on the Facebook groups to try and find someone with a muffler delete local to me (Lawton OK).  I also plan to visit the dealer to look and hear the Borla Touring cat-back.  If the delete is too loud, i'll spend $1200 on the full cat-back but saving $1000 bucks is definitely tempting and worth the investigation!!

Muffler delete would not be for you, I would not suggest it.

 

Borla Touring quite a few owners enjoy, same muffler as the GM performance exhaust and in my opinion the quietest borla muffler available.  If your just looking for a little sound on startup and when you give it some gas, Touring is the direction I'd suggest

  • Like 1
Terry Wood Enthusiast

Terry Wood

Posted
Posted
On 12/4/2020 at 6:51 PM, 204Denali said:

Muffler delete would not be for you, I would not suggest it.

 

Borla Touring quite a few owners enjoy, same muffler as the GM performance exhaust and in my opinion the quietest borla muffler available.  If your just looking for a little sound on startup and when you give it some gas, Touring is the direction I'd suggest

I did the delete.  I was only slightly too loud but went with 3.5" pipe to replace the gap left by cutting out the muffler and got bad drone at 1500 rpm.  Installed a Borla XR1 and got the proper volume but still had the drone.  Went back stock without the flapper until I can justify $1200 for sound.

204Denali Enthusiast

204Denali

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Terry Wood said:

I did the delete.  I was only slightly too loud but went with 3.5" pipe to replace the gap left by cutting out the muffler and got bad drone at 1500 rpm.  Installed a Borla XR1 and got the proper volume but still had the drone.  Went back stock without the flapper until I can justify $1200 for sound.

Contrary to what people always say, Borla has drone when you all straight pipe. It can be minimal but it is still there. I’ve heard keeping a single flapper or two removed the drone completely but you will sacrifice some sound volume. 
I have the ATAK setup, I love It, no flappers and barely any drone but it is there at times. It is loud though. 
I have heard good things about the type S muffler, little quieter but still gives off the sound that’s missing with the touring muffler. 
IMO the gm perf exhaust isn’t worth it because of the touring muffler.  Isn’t loud enough for me nor do I think it’s worthy of the price point, which is why I went custom setup instead. 

Rob Mugs Enthusiast

Rob Mugs

Posted
Posted (edited)
22 hours ago, Terry Wood said:

I did the delete.  I was only slightly too loud but went with 3.5" pipe to replace the gap left by cutting out the muffler and got bad drone at 1500 rpm.  Installed a Borla XR1 and got the proper volume but still had the drone.  Went back stock without the flapper until I can justify $1200 for sound.

Could you take a clip of this inside/outside?

 

A lot of people are pulling the muffler and keeping the flapper which makes little sense to me since it is a pretty large restriction.  Even when fully-open, it appears to block off +/- 30% of the space.  IMHO, if I'm going to get a little louder, I should also be freeing up restrictions

download.jpg.18dbd1122e0faf4024822f87f1bc531a.jpg

Edited by Rob Mugs
  • 2 weeks later...
Terry Wood Enthusiast

Terry Wood

Posted
Posted
On 12/7/2020 at 8:46 PM, Rob Mugs said:

Could you take a clip of this inside/outside?

 

A lot of people are pulling the muffler and keeping the flapper which makes little sense to me since it is a pretty large restriction.  Even when fully-open, it appears to block off +/- 30% of the space.  IMHO, if I'm going to get a little louder, I should also be freeing up restrictions

download.jpg.18dbd1122e0faf4024822f87f1bc531a.jpg

I already went back to stock and deleted the flapper.

Terry Wood Enthusiast

Terry Wood

Posted
Posted
On 12/6/2020 at 10:30 PM, 204Denali said:

Contrary to what people always say, Borla has drone when you all straight pipe. It can be minimal but it is still there. I’ve heard keeping a single flapper or two removed the drone completely but you will sacrifice some sound volume. 
I have the ATAK setup, I love It, no flappers and barely any drone but it is there at times. It is loud though. 
I have heard good things about the type S muffler, little quieter but still gives off the sound that’s missing with the touring muffler. 
IMO the gm perf exhaust isn’t worth it because of the touring muffler.  Isn’t loud enough for me nor do I think it’s worthy of the price point, which is why I went custom setup instead. 

I think the problem was that the XR1 was a straight through muffler..... I feel if it had baffles inside to change the air and sound wave flow it would have been better.

Rob Mugs Enthusiast

Rob Mugs

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Terry Wood said:

I already went back to stock and deleted the flapper.

That is what I am interested in hearing.  Stock muffler without flapper.  I've got a saw and welder :)

  • Like 1
204Denali Enthusiast

204Denali

Posted
Posted
On 12/17/2020 at 8:59 PM, Rob Mugs said:

That is what I am interested in hearing.  Stock muffler without flapper.  I've got a saw and welder :)

Might as well go muffler delete at that point. 

204Denali Enthusiast

204Denali

Posted
Posted
On 12/17/2020 at 7:43 PM, Terry Wood said:

I think the problem was that the XR1 was a straight through muffler..... I feel if it had baffles inside to change the air and sound wave flow it would have been better.

It’s all in the setup. I’ve had straight through designs on all my cars, no drone issues. Truck is different than car obviously, and I’m not going to put the same $$ into my exhaust system as my cars. Your not wrong though, chambers would help but so would the flappers. Anything that would impede exhaust flow will cut down on drone, but will also hamper tone and to a degree performance. Just comes down to what you want from your system. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • scotthvac.net
      2022-24 halogen - led grille swap

      By scotthvac.net · Posted

      2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • davester
      Replacement Radiator

      By davester · Posted

      And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • davester
      Turning radius

      By davester · Posted

      Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...