Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I bought a 2019 RST Rocky Ridge XP back in April.  I love my truck but new passengers enjoy it until the get out and completely miss the step bar and almost hit pavement.  It came with BlackHorse Cutlass step bars.  My truck is all black and so are the step bars.  I’m wanting to get some sort of running board lights to help people see their step.  I’ve been looking at the Rigid Ind. 6 light rock light package.  I was wondering if I could put 4 of them in fenderwells and use 2 of the lights for the step bars, but wire theminto the dome light circuit instead of a switch.  Input would be greatly appreciated.  

Posted

Does your truck have puddle lights? if so you might want to consider connecting them to that circuit instead. attaching to the interior lights would work, there are some threads on adding additional interior lights that will tell you what wire to connect it to on the BCM, you may need a relay or some other device to power rock lights from it though. the one downside to that is there is a button to turn on the interior lights on the upper console. if you connect them there the outside lights will come on at the same time, and that interior lights feature can be used while driving. the puddle lights might actually be a better functionality to follow. I believe they also are smart enough not to turn on unless its dark out, which would add a bit of sophistication to your mod. the puddle lights are controlled by the BCM as well. If you don't have them, you could always probe the connector with a multimeter to see if the circuits are active, just not connected to anything.

Posted

I wish mine did come with the puddle light option but I do not have the mirrors with them.  It would be nice to get the full capability of light all the way around my truck when hitting the task lighting button though.  I’m sure I could upgrade the mirrors and a wiring harness to achieve this.  Weighing the cost is anothet factor.  The Rigid  lights cost around $400 and I’m sure the mirrors would be more.  I know the towing mirrors are around $700 for a pair and the harness adds more to that. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...