Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I have two GM's.       06 Silverado Crew 4 WD 5.3L LT model FFV 194,000 mi.

                                    06 Suburban 4WD 5.3L FFV 217,****** mi.

 

Suburban runs 27.5 - 30lbs oil pressure OP. temp (in drive) Foot on brake- Not driving

Silverado runs 38-40lbs op temp (in drive.)                             Foot on brake- Not driving

 

 I wanted some input if these are acceptable or the oil pump needs replaced? I don't like the Suburbans oil pressure but if its good I can live with it. I feel like I should be able to get 325,****** mi out of the Burban. The Silverado's pressure is more what I would like to see. I wanted to some input if these are OK. 27.5lbs. in gear warm seems low. I don't think these are AFM engines. I had a problem with one of those. I don't want excessive bearing wear, I am trying to get into the 300's as far as miles go on both of my vehicles, thanks in advance. I know a lot of ppl put n here their truck has many miles and runs 45psi warm in gear and off the charts on the gas, that is what is making me ask.. are both my Silverado and Suburban too low?  I found a blurb from www.carautoportal.com that says a 5.3L in good working order will run 20psi to 30 psi warm in idle condition ( guessing not in gear Loaded) and 45 psi to 75 psi driving.

Edited by Bigvern
Posted

That's more than enough for at idle and in gear. Being in park or in gear doesn't matter, the rpms typically drop 50rpm when you go from park to drive anyway.

 

I don't have the sheet in front of me but I recall it being that you only need somewhere around 7-10psi per 1,000rpm. So you are well above that. But even those numbers aren't the bottom line, you can have 40-50psi at full throttle and still have plenty of oil pressure for the bearings. Not seeing 60-70psi isn't the end of the world. The later model trucks max out around 50-55psi because of the oil pressure relief valve in the oil pan.

 

If your oil pressure is only getting to 30psi at 2,000rpm, it's a little on the low side for typical engines. I usually see around 40-45psi. If you want to be proactive about this you could get a new OEM oil pump with new pickup tube oil ring. Often the pick up tube oring is the cause for the slightly less oil pressure.

  • Like 1
Posted

Ok, my Burban will run around 30lbs to 37lbs at 3o mph. My Silverado at 30mph would be more like 35lbs 40lbs. I may redo the pump in the suburban then. I want them both to last for way longer than the mileage I have.

Posted

Sounds silly but sometimes even the oil filter you run and oil weight can change oil pressure.

  • Like 1
Posted

ok David, this is where I am confused by the charts/ manual. On the above, it looks to me idle in my vehicle is around 750 rpm's. So it runs at lowest 27.5 lbs at idle (750) rpm at op. temp. I am not sure how to use the above scale unless I am driving? I am what I would call a little more advanced than a weekend mechanic or oil changer. I hope this post makes sense. I am not sure how those numbers work for me? Thanks in advance.

Posted
23 hours ago, CamGTP said:

Sounds silly but sometimes even the oil filter you run and oil weight can change oil pressure.

Ok, the truck says 5/30 I'm sure you know that. I use 5/30, I also run usually a fram or Wix. TG3506 Fram, I use Mobil 1 full syn. I have started using a 1/2 Qt. Lucas oil stabilizer ( standard white bottle). I know when I first started driving I ran 10/30 in everything I owned. As I got older I followed the cap. 5/30 seems pretty thin to me, I know govt. wants more mileage so 5/30 is supposed to pump easier like the whole 0/W20 thing. Is if ok in an 06 to try 10/30 for an oil change? I don't want to tax the system and mess anything up trying to pump thicker oil around. If 10/30 is ok, should I avoid the Lucas in that oil change too? I don't want to go experimenting and mess up something. I do use 5 oz of seafoam every oil change. Typical per directions, pour in amount based on oil (qt's) 5-6 oz, run to op. temp, (Do not drive). Shut off drain. I like seafoam. I use it to clean instead of motor medic or trans fluid. Let me know what you think. Maybe I am just worrying too much. I will here in the next month drop the diff in the suburban and redo the pump and the dip tube seal. I think it couldnt hurt with 217,****** mi. My driving pressure is good, I feel it could be higher at op. temp at idle than 27.5 lbs. thought about high vol. pump, don't want to mess up tho. read recently about difference in high pressure, high vol. High vol seemed way to go, thoughts on that? If it's trouble, I def. wont do it, I'll use standard melling replacement. Thank you again, Bigvern.

Posted (edited)

I ran 10W40 in my 2006 Sierra with 255,000 miles on it, never had a problem.

 

Going to a 10W30 isn't going to change anything, it's still a "30" at operating temp and just makes it pump harder at cold temps because it's a 10W now. If anything go to a 5W40.

 

I never run any of that Lucas stuff or Seafoam in the oil. If you change your oil on time and use good quality oil there is no need for any of that stuff. If I suspect I have sludge build up or carbon build up on a new to me vehicle or a customer car I will use a product to help clean things out. A good way to tell on LS engines is just pull the drivers side valve cover, if the rockers are clean as can be then there is no problems.

 

No high volume pumps. Either a standard replacements or a standard/high pressure pump.

Edited by CamGTP
Posted

I had the same, my diesel shop said it was OK, then when towing under heavy/hot conditions I got "Low Oil Pressure" warnings. I drop gears when I;m towint heavy/hot(100deg.+) and I upgraded my motor oil (and filtration).

Posted
On 2/14/2021 at 9:31 PM, CamGTP said:

I ran 10W40 in my 2006 Sierra with 255,000 miles on it, never had a problem.

 

Going to a 10W30 isn't going to change anything, it's still a "30" at operating temp and just makes it pump harder at cold temps because it's a 10W now. If anything go to a 5W40.

 

I never run any of that Lucas stuff or Seafoam in the oil. If you change your oil on time and use good quality oil there is no need for any of that stuff. If I suspect I have sludge build up or carbon build up on a new to me vehicle or a customer car I will use a product to help clean things out. A good way to tell on LS engines is just pull the drivers side valve cover, if the rockers are clean as can be then there is no problems.

 

No high volume pumps. Either a standard replacements or a standard/high pressure pump.

Ok, Well everyone seems to agree my pressure is good at op temp with 217,****** mi. I use seafoam as a rinse. I use mobil 1, everyone has an opinion on it, lotta ppl say its bad. What is good oil then, I aint running royal purple. I guess I am just going to leave it, change oil, clean air filter and hope for the best.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Bigvern said:

Ok, Well everyone seems to agree my pressure is good at op temp with 217,****** mi. I use seafoam as a rinse. I use mobil 1, everyone has an opinion on it, lotta ppl say its bad. What is good oil then, I aint running royal purple. I guess I am just going to leave it, change oil, clean air filter and hope for the best.

When a fella makes a stand like this it gets simple. It's less about the oil you use and more about how often you change it. Most newer motors from GM, all perhaps, have low tension oil ring sets and as such very sensitive to gum, varnish and sludge. I'm fighting one right now that was a QSUD DEXOS2 user on 5K OCI's and frankly, I wasn't changing it often enough. Rings stuck and oil usage got as high as a quart per tank of fuel! 

 

Anything that is DEXOS 2 approved is a 'full synthetic which also means it is at best a Group III + oil. At worst a Group II/III blend. The DEXOS license does not allow for a Group IV or V base oil. So...as all of them have to meet minimums for either chemistry or performance then it becomes a game of price and OCI. In a case such as yours where you refuse to use a boutique oil then a short OCI on a really cheap oil with a really good filter WILL give you a good bang for the buck. For me in my problem child that has meant COSTCO Kirkland at $21 to $25  for 10 quarts and 2,500-3,000 mile oil changes. Same thing will drive you broke using a oil twice as expensive...such as your beloved Mobil 1. 

 

BTW my problem child is, after the fight back now using oil at a rate of a quart per 10,000 + miles or a few ounces between 2,500 mile oil changes. That is a rare save....

Posted

Im not locked in as far as oil? Suggestions, I have used all major brands and didnt think Mobil was a fufu oil. Its literally within $2 of all other major Dexos approved oils in my town. I have followed GM's BS advice after seeing what you wrote. I use the oli life monitor, they claim that is fine. I used to do every 3,****** religiously. Any input?

Posted
12 hours ago, Bigvern said:

Im not locked in as far as oil? Suggestions, I have used all major brands and didnt think Mobil was a fufu oil. Its literally within $2 of all other major Dexos approved oils in my town. I have followed GM's BS advice after seeing what you wrote. I use the oli life monitor, they claim that is fine. I used to do every 3,****** religiously. Any input?

Mobil 1 for the most part is a very successful exercise in marketing. ALL Dexos 2 oils have to meet the exact same specifications so anytime you're paying extra...you're just paying extra. 

 

You already have allot of miles on both these motors so it would seem your 3K program was quite successful, don't you think? At that OCI the money play would be COSTCO Kirkland, Walmart Super Tech, or Amazon Basics and a good filter changed every time. I buy Kirkland on sale cases at a time for $21 per two five quart jug cartons. $2.10 a quart. Cheaper than conventional oil.

 

My AFM equipped motors get AMSOIL on 5K mile OCI's as does everything I buy new.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 2,406 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...