Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
My LTZ does not have factory nav.
It's an option, not standard. LTZ is the lowest trim level you get factory navigation on.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
On 3/20/2021 at 12:01 AM, AlaskaErik said:

My max tow LTZ has 1910 lbs of payload.  But you need to look at the yellow driver door jamb sticker of each truck you're interested in in order to get the exact payload capacity of that particular truck.  But the real question is, how much does your trailer weigh fully loaded?  Multiply that amount by 13 percent for a WAG on your tongue weight if it's a travel trailer you're looking to tow.  Too many people try to push the extreme limits of a half ton when they really should be looking at a 3/4 ton or one ton.

How is yours configured? Thanks

Posted
On 3/19/2021 at 9:19 PM, OnTheReel said:

My LTZ max tow 6.2 payload is 1,914 pounds.

 

You can figure a lighter equipped LTZ or RST would be bit higher.

How is yours configured? Thanks

Posted
1 hour ago, JJ9145 said:

How is yours configured? Thanks

Crew cab short box with everything...Premium Package, Tech Package, etc.

Posted

I just got my custom ordered RST w/6.2 and max tow package. I have every option available for the RST except for the moonroof. Payload is 1,957.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, JJ9145 said:

How is yours configured? Thanks

Basic LTZ with 6.2L engine and 10 speed tranny and max trailering package.  I have the basic technology package with blind spot monitoring and rear cross traffic alert, as well as the moon roof. 

Edited by AlaskaErik
Posted
5 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

Crew cab short box with everything...Premium Package, Tech Package, etc.

Thanks. 

20 minutes ago, NoLand said:

I just got my custom ordered RST w/6.2 and max tow package. I have every option available for the RST except for the moonroof. Payload is 1,957.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks that's good payload. Wish they had the Vented seats available.

16 minutes ago, AlaskaErik said:

Basic LTZ with 6.2L engine and 10 speed tranny and max trailering package.  I have the basic technology package with blind spot monitoring and rear cross traffic alert, as well as the moon roof. 

Thanks for that.

Posted

Yeah, I was pleasantly surprised with the payload. Wish it had the vented seats, but I would have had to step up to high country (because I wanted the color matched bumpers and grille).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...