Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My 2018 was totaled and I don't have access to it right now.  I am shopping for another 2018, but want to make sure that I get the IO5 radio, if I don't find one with navigation pre-installed.  I have asked several dealers to send me a picture of the tag; suggesting that it should be in one of the two glove boxes, probably up top, but none have been able to find it.  Where is the Service Parts Identification tag on the 2018 y/m trucks?

Posted

Also IO5/6 are easy to identify over the IOB radio.  Radio controls are the dead giveaway as is the screen size, 7 inch (iob) vs 8 inch.  

 

IOB:

 

GM MyLink Camera Interface for 7" IOB Display Radios 2016-2018 9002-2765 -  Brandmotion

 

 

 

IO5/6

 

2014-2016 4" to 8" Screen Upgrade (IO4 to IO5/IO6 with CP/AA) - White  Automotive & Media Services

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, belchfire said:

My 2018 was totaled and I don't have access to it right now.  I am shopping for another 2018, but want to make sure that I get the IO5 radio, if I don't find one with navigation pre-installed.  I have asked several dealers to send me a picture of the tag; suggesting that it should be in one of the two glove boxes, probably up top, but none have been able to find it.  Where is the Service Parts Identification tag on the 2018 y/m trucks?

Here's a pic of my RPO sticker that's in the glove box; look for the code in that list. Mine happens to be an IO6, as you can see in pic. This sticker will list every unit in your truck.

IO6 - AUDIO SYSTEM, 8" DIAGONAL COLOR TOUCH W/ NAVIGATION & MYLINK

 

Hope this helps

20200226_125336.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Would I be safe in assuming any given radio is IO5 if it has the OnStar Nav link showing the the dealer photos?  Like this one?

OnStar nav.jpg

 

Also, @newdude, are you saying that there are only three radio options?  IOB, IO5 and IO6?  If so, this should be pretty easy to determine.

 

Edited by belchfire
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, belchfire said:

Would I be safe in assuming any given radio is IO5 if it has the OnStar Nav link showing the the dealer photos?  Like this one?

 

 

Also, @newdude, are you saying that there are only three radio options?  IOB, IO5 and IO6?  If so, this should be pretty easy to determine.

 

 

 

Yes to the OnStar NAV icon being IO5.

 

2016 and newer you will find IO3, IOB, IO5 and IO6.  IO3 is WT and maybe Custom trim base base non touch 4 inch radio (this one is real easy to spot because 4 inch screen).  IO3 was gone after 2017.  IOB is the mid radio with touch 7 inch, which was an option on base trims.  IOB became standard 2018.  IO5 and IO6 are uplevel radio, 6 being with factory nav, 5 being without.  

 

An LT trim or higher should only be IO5 and IO6 for 2016-2019 old body.  Don't ever recall seeing an LT with IOB.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...