Jump to content

Anyone heard this noise before?

Jason7191
 Share

Recommended Posts

Jason7191 New Member

Jason7191

Posted
Posted (edited)

I bought the truck new in 2020, never heard this before. It sounds like it’s coming from the speakers, and will alternate driver and passenger side. Edit: this is a 2020 trail boss 5.3, it’s not showing warning lights or anything. 
 

https://vimeo.com/679176761

Edited by Jason7191
Missing info
Rob Mugs Enthusiast

Rob Mugs

Posted
Posted

Sounds like wind noise to me.  I have experienced this in the past with crosswinds 

SC4R3C120W Enthusiast

SC4R3C120W

Posted
Posted

sounds like the road. When the camera moves forward you can see uneven pavement in patches. Happens to me on some freeways running over grooves. 

 

 

Jason7191 New Member

Jason7191

Posted
  • Author
Posted
22 minutes ago, Rob Mugs said:

Sounds like wind noise to me.  I have experienced this in the past with crosswinds 

Wow that’s crazy. The wind was very high, it almost sounded like it was from the speakers. Kinda nuts

Rob Mugs Enthusiast

Rob Mugs

Posted
Posted
On 2/18/2022 at 1:59 PM, Jason7191 said:

Wow that’s crazy. The wind was very high, it almost sounded like it was from the speakers. Kinda nuts

Thought the same thing myself.  I thought it was the dash speaker but went away on less windy days

  • 2 months later...
ShadyShopDog Enthusiast

ShadyShopDog

Posted
Posted

I had that same thing and they replaced my weather stripping on each door under warranty. They told me that has taken care of the issue and that they were aware of that problem. Haven't had it come back.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      Joke Thread

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...