Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Just a small thing I noticed...

 

Was watching some of the First Drive videos on YT and one in particular mentioned that as a last minute change the mud flaps were removed. The reason being that off-road they were getting shoved upwards and not only damaging the flaps but also the new plastic trim around the wheel well. Can see they changed for production as the pre-production still had them. Anything extra to help with clearance I guess like with the exhaust. 

 

(Mentioned at 3:30)

 

AT4X doesn't get this change but has similar setup so wonder if anyone has had that complaint on Sierras getting damaged since they all have the side trim and flaps. The Trail Boss didn't have the side trim so guess was never a problem till the ZR2...

 

*Pictures aren't my own*

 

43138026-6418-4f58-94f8-145efe7e61bb-silverado_zr2-rr3-4.jpg

2022-Chevy-Silverado-ZR2-15.jpg.jpg

2022-GMC-Sierra-1500-AT4X-in-Cayenne-Red-Tintcoat_-rear-2400x1600.jpg

Edited by claw2791
  • claw2791 changed the title to ZR2/AT4X Mudflaps (Or lack therof)
Posted

Strange?  Why do one but not the other. Yet, doesn’t surprise me. GM looks like they are paying more attention to the ZR2 than the AT4X. Heck they both should have gotten the same bumper. I really like the ZR2 bumper. AT4X is same as standard AT4.  

Posted

Yeah the GMC got shafted when it comes to the bumper. What is odd is that they gave the Yukon AT4 a unique bumper , so why not the truck ? I swear some of the decision making at GM makes zero sense . Well it does dollars and cents for them sense. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Yeah it's like they did the AT4X because they had to and didn't invest too much time in it. 🤔 I get they were probably going for it to have mostly same features as ZR2 but in a more toned down way, but they could of at least had it stand out differently more than the AT4.

 

5 hours ago, TNTSilverado said:

Strange?  Why do one but not the other. Yet, doesn’t surprise me. GM looks like they are paying more attention to the ZR2 than the AT4X. Heck they both should have gotten the same bumper. I really like the ZR2 bumper. AT4X is same as standard AT4.  

 

Edited by claw2791
Posted
2 hours ago, claw2791 said:

Yeah it's like they did the AT4X because they had to and didn't invest too much time in it. 🤔 I get they were probably going for it to have mostly same features as ZR2 but in a more toned down way, but they could of at least had it stand out differently more than the AT4.

 

 

Which goes against everything GMC is. GMC is supposed to 1+ Chevrolet. It's "claimed" to be the more luxurious of the 2 brands, but they seemed to half-@$$ the AT4X.  Heck like @f8l vnmstated. The GMC Yukon has the exact bumper, it's not going to cost GM that much money to put it onto the AT4X.  Sometimes I sit here and scratch my head and wonder how in the world some people get to where they are in this world without know a d@mn thing.

 

Like my old man once stated: "It's not WHAT you know, it's WHO you know! 

  • Like 1
Posted

It's the "luxurious" part that that GMC kept them. It keeps the mud off your truck when you drive through a puddle. The ZR2 is expected to be used like it was intended. GMCs are going to be bought just for bragging rights and not actually used. People will buy the X because the shocks make all the difference in the world for ride comfort. I want to know if they can be retrofitted to a 19-22 refresh Trail Boss.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Took delivery of my AT4X last week and first thing I did was remove the mud flaps, was Absolutely needed to size up tires since no leveling kits available for these yet. 
 

was able to fit 285/60r20 Nittos (33.7x11.5) on Fuel 20x9 +1 offset wheels and helped give it the stance it should have came from the factory with in my opinion. 
 

100% agree on the front bumper. My wife has a Yukon AT4 and they should have given it that same treatment at least if not the ZR2 bumper for clearance. 
 

loving the truck though and the interior is night and day from my 2020 AT4! 

1F99CFB2-9EDD-4D54-8F17-77E95F901DFE.jpeg

EE2C4BF4-027C-47B5-B99C-EBFFB3098FA9.jpeg

FC735227-D6FF-40BC-8EE0-6BE1750CEAA7.jpeg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • HD at the moment, are kinda their own deal.  How LTZ sells on those vs on 1500, there is a difference.   They are merging most of the mid trims on 1500.  LT, RST and LTZ are replaced by one trim, Silverado.  LT and RST are a BIG portion of sales.    Bad naming choice aside, the new Silverado trim will offer the spread of options that those three trims offered.  So expect to see things like the tech package for example, and memory seats.  And LT Trail Boss will now just be "Trail Boss" (formerly LT Trail Boss) but will offer content spread like the new Silverado trim will.  The press photos showed the Trail Boss (formerly LT Trail Boss) has access to Super Cruise now, which on the current truck was High Country only.       Here is the Trail Boss interior.  Memory seats and Super Cruise are present.  All things the LT Trail Boss it replaces, and the RST it was based on didn't get on the current gen.  You had to go to LTZ or ZR2 for memory seats, and High Country for Super Cruise.      
    • I installed a Hellwig rear sway bar on my 21 Sierra SLT, it made a huge difference on how the truck handles, no body roll, the trucks much more planted now. Not sure of the suspension differences between the 21 and 26,  if its body roll your having a sway bar will solve it. 
    • So a follow up and my fix. I found in online searches the live data to look at on a scan tool to verify the fuel tank pressure sensor was working.  It showed an spec number towards the lower end of the rang, but in spec.  Then while it was running opened the gas cap and the pressure should change.  It didn't change even a tiny bit.  The data for the purge valve said it was open...never changed. So then I measured the voltages on the plug for the fuel pressure sensor and they matched what it should be.  So local car quest parts had the sensor in stock...it was a bit of a pain to remove and an even bigger one to get it to actually go back in.  It helped to unbolt the driveshaft and bungie cord away from the gas tank to give a bit more room to work. So fuel tank pressure sensor in I cleared the code, and started it up.  I went to the scan tool's live data and... Eureka! The pressure number was different and fluctuated a bit.  So took it on a short drive and pressure number varied saw the purge valve go from closed to open and back to closed.  Drove it to and from work for roughly a week plugged in the scan tool no codes.  I took it in to get tested and passed.  In my state's infinite wisdom (oops meant greed), since I pushed the test with the maximum extensions I have to take it back in by Feb '27 to 'get it back up to date', then my next test won't be until Feb '29. 
    • Any grease on the stud threads of any kind?   Wheel studs should have NOTHING on them for proper torquing and so the nuts don't back off.     Are all of the mating surfaces clean?  So wheel, rotor and hub?     We've had plenty of trucks at work with that wheel, this is a first to me.  Makes me think they've got a lube tech putting anti-seize on all the wheel studs or some kind of grease, and they need to stop doing that.  To have 11 other trucks with the same exact problem.      
    • I was a Chevy guy for years, then switched to GMC because I liked the looks better.  I'm actually thinking I like the Chevy looks better than GMC for the first time in a lot of years.   One thing I know for certain, the new GMC dash is hideous!  Chevy wins this one!  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...